“ISIS’ Dabiq communicative strategies, NATO and Europe. Who is learning from whom?”: Review of an article by Michelangelo Conoscenti

Authors

  • Kristina I. Gera St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-4321

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.407

Abstract

This article is a review of the work of Michelangelo Conoscenti, professor of the Turin University (Italy), “ISIS’ Dabiq communicative strategies, NATO and Europe. Who is learning from whom?” The author of the review analyses M. Conoscenti’s work from the standpoint of the communicative strategies between such actors of international relations as NATO and ISIS. The review focuses on the nine sections of M. Conoscenti’s work: introduction; review of the literature; corpus description and names of the entity; the corpus linguistic analysis; a linguistic interpretation of Dabiq; deception, in Dabiq and in military doctrine; Dabiq as Armageddon? A Western isotopy for a Western narrative trajectory; the narrative against Europe; conclusion. The author of the review pays precise attention to the fact that M. Conoscenti, exploring the content of eleven issues of the journal, uses the techniques of corpus linguistics and the theory of meme introduced by Dawkins. M. Conoscenti writes that NATO uses narrative of fear and military discourse to establish its communication with the world. The review focuses on M. Conoscenti’s evidence in favor of the failure of NATO’s strategic communication in comparison with the advanced strategies of Dabiq.

Keywords:

NATO, ISIS, strategies of international communications, Dabiq, media propaganda

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература/
References

Conoscenti M. ISIS’ Dabiq Communicative Strategies, NATO and Europe. Who is Learning from Whom? Discourses and Counter-discourses on Europe, from the Enlightenment to the EU. Eds Manuela Ceretta and Barbara CurliAbingdon. Taylor & Francis, 2017, pp. 238–257.

Beifuss A. The Logotypes and Iconography of Insurgent Groups and Terrorist Organizations. The ICON Journal, 2016. Available at: https://www.iconeye.com/opinion/review/item/12365-isis-magazinedabiq-is-not-only-news-it-is-public-relations (accessed: 10.04.2019).

Gambhir H. K. Dabiq: The Strategic Messaging of the Islamic State. Institute for the Study of War. 2014. 12 p.

Ghanem-Yazbeck D. The Islamic State: The Fear of Decline? Carnegie Middle East Center. 2014. 14 p.

Masi A. ISIS Propaganda Magazine Dabiq For Sale On Amazon, Gets Taken Down. International Business Times. 2015. Available at: https://www.ibtimes.com/isis-propaganda-magazine-dabiq-saleamazon-gets-taken-down-1961036 (accessed: 10.04.2019).

Moubayed S. Under the Black Flag: At the Frontier of the New Jihad. Ed. by I. B. Tauris, 2015. 256 p.

Kolozaridi P., Il'in A. Islamic Media State. Indeks bezopasnosti. 2015, vol. 21, no. 1 (112), pp. 161–168. (In Russian)

Seven things that I learned after reading ISIS‘s magazine. Available at: https://www.cracked.com/blog/isis-wants-us-to-invade-7-facts-revealed-by-their-magazine/ (accessed: 10.04.2019).

Yamamah A. The Shift of Jihad: Between Ideal and Historical Context. Jurnal al-Tamaddun, 2012, no. 2, pp. 135–154.

Al-Saidat E. M., Al-Khawalda M. I. Jihad: A Victim of Policy and Misinterpretation. Asian Social Science, 2012, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 202–207.

Arikewuyo A.-S. I. Contextualising the Legacy of the Prophet Muhammad on Religious Tolerance for Peaceful Co-existence in a Multi-faith Society. Islamic Quarterly, 2015, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 215–236.

Kibble D. G. Dabiq, the Islamic State's Magazine: A Critical Analysis. Available at: https://www.mepc.org/journal/dabiq-islamic-states-magazine-critical-analysis. (accessed: 10.04.2019).

Kfir I. NATO’s Paradigm Shift: Searching for a Traditional Security-Human Security Nexus. Contemporary Security Policy, 2015, no. 36 (2), pp. 219–243. DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2015.106176.

Conoscenti M. Language Engineering and Media Strategies in Recent Wars. Roma, Bulzoni, 2004. 224 p.

Smelser N. J. On comparative analysis, interdisciplinarity and internationalization in sociology. International Sociology, 2003, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 643–657.

Conoscenti M. In Transit between Two Wor(l)ds: NATO Military Discourse at a Turning Point. Languaging in and across Communities: New Voices, New Identities. Eds S. Campagna, E. Ochse, V. Pulcini and M. Solly, Peter Lang. Bern, 2016. pp. 427–452.

Published

2019-12-04

How to Cite

Gera, K. I. . (2019). “ISIS’ Dabiq communicative strategies, NATO and Europe. Who is learning from whom?”: Review of an article by Michelangelo Conoscenti . Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 12(4), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.407