Global space of culinary and its’ empirical research

Authors

  • Азат Борисович Рахманов Lomonosow Moscow State University, 1, Leninskiye gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu12.2016.408

Abstract

The author analyzes the global culinary space that has been created by globalization. There are many national cuisines in every global city that exist as chains of restaurants. There are culinary superpowers, great culinary powers, middle culinary powers, small culinary powers and super-small culinary powers. The culinary potential of every country should be considered as a component of its soft power. The status of any country within the culinary space can be characterized by degree of its culinary sovereignty. This dimension depends on the quantity of restaurants of national cuisine in the country. There are countries with full culinary sovereignty, countries with limited culinary sovereignty, culinary semi-colonies and culinary colonies. Refs 11. Tables 3.

Keywords:

sociology of food, culinary, global culinary space, culinary power, culinary sovereignty, culinary colony, culinary nationalism, culinary cosmopolitism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Robertson R. Globalization. Social Theory and Global Culture. London: SAGE Publications, 1992. 211 p.

Waters M. The Globalization. London, New York: Routledge, 2001. 273 p.

Beardsworth A., Keil T. Sociology on the Menu. An invitation to the study of food and society. London; New York: Routledge, 1997. 288 p.

Korthals M. Before Dinner. Philosophy and Ethics of Food. Dordrecht: Springer, 2004. 219 p.

Kaplan D. The Philosophy of Food. Berkeley, Los Angeles; London: University Of California Press, 2012. 320 p.

Ceccarini R. Pizza and Pizza Chefs in Japan: A Case of Culinary Globalization. Leiden, Boston: Koninklijke Brill NV. 2011. 160 p.

Веселов Ю. В. Повседневные практики питания // Социологические исследования. 2015. № 1. С. 95–104.

Носкова А. В. Питание как объект социологии и маркер социального неравенства // Вестник Института социологии. 2016. № 3 (14). С. 49–64.

A. T. Kearney Global Cities Index, 2014. URL: https://www.atkearney.com/research-studies/globalcities-index/2014 (дата обращения: 01.11.2015).

UNWTO Tourism Highlights. 2015 Edition. Madrid: World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), 2015. p. 16.

Трипадвизор. Россия. URL: http://www.tripadvisor.ru/ (дата обращения: 10.12.2015).


References

Robertson R. Globalization. Social Theory and Global Culture. London, SAGE Publications, 1992. 211 p.

Waters M. The Globalization. London, New York, Routledge Publ., 2001. 273 p.

Beardsworth A., Keil T. Sociology on the Menu. An invitation to the study of food and society. London, New York, Routledge Publ., 1997. 288 p.

Korthals M. Before Dinner. Philosophy and Ethics of Food. Dordrecht, Springer Publ., 2004. 219 p.

Kaplan D. The Philosophy of Food. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University Of California Press, 2012. 320 p.

Ceccarini R. Pizza and Pizza Chefs in Japan: A Case of Culinary Globalization. Leiden, Boston, Koninklijke Brill NV Publ., 2011. 160 p.

Veselov Iu. V. Povsednevnye praktiki pitaniia [The everyday practices of eating]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological research], 2015, no. 1, pp. 95–104. (In Russian)

Noskova A. V. Pitanie kak ob”ekt sotsiologii i marker sotsial’nogo neravenstva [Eating as a subject and a marker of social inequality]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii, 2016, no. 3 (14), pp. 49–64. (In Russian)

A. T. Kearney Global Cities Index, 2014. Available at: https://www.atkearney.com/research-studies/global-cities-index/2014 (accessed: 01.11.2015).

UNWTO Tourism Highlights. 2015 Edition. Madrid, World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), 2015, p. 16.

Tripadvizor. Rossiia [Tripadvisor. Russia]. Available at: http://www.tripadvisor.ru/ (accessed: 10.12.2015). (In Russian)

Published

2017-03-27

How to Cite

Рахманов, А. Б. (2017). Global space of culinary and its’ empirical research. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, (4), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu12.2016.408

Issue

Section

Tranformation of modern socio-cultural space