EMOTIONAL COMPONENTS OF RATIONAL AND INTUITIVE THINKING STYLE IN MANAGEMENT DECISION MAKING
Abstract
The article considered correlation of rational and intuitive thinking styles (S. Epstein’s inquirer) with the characteristics of emotional intelligence (D. Lusin’s inquirer). An empirical research was carried out. It was based on a sample of the holding structural divisions heads (N = 217) studying a course of business education. Two hypotheses were tested: 1) rational thinking style allows to handle emotions as data and therefore positively associated with both indicators of understanding emotions, and with indicators of management of emotions; 2) intuitive thinking style differentiates less between the rational data and emotional evaluation, and therefore it is less connected with understanding emotions indicators and even lesser — with the ability to manage them. Both hypotheses were confirmed. Refs 18. Figs 2. Table 1.
Keywords:
intuition, rationality, emotional intelligence, predictive ability
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Burke L. A., Miller M. K. Taking the mystery out of intuitive decision making // Academy of Management Executive. 1999. Vol. 13, N 4. P. 91–99.
Тутов Л. А., Манасенко К. А. Интуиция как фактор принятия организационных решений: методологические аспекты проблемы // Вестник Московского университета. 2008. Сер. 6. Экономика. № 4. С. 3–19.
Dane E., Pratt M. G. Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making // Academy of Management Review. 2007. Vol. 32, N 1. P. 33–54.
Bechara A., Damasio H., Tranel D., Damasio A. R. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy // Science. 1997. N 275. Р. 1293–1295.
Damasio A. R. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1994. 312 р.
Bechara A., Damasio A. R., Damasio H., Anderson S. W. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex // Cognition. 1994. Vol. 50. Issues 1–3. Р. 7–12.
Bechara A., Damasio A. R. The somatic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision // Games and Economic Behaviour. 2005. N 52 (2). P. 336–372.
Hogarth R. M. Educating intuition: A challenge for the 21-st century // Barcelona: Els Opuscles del CREI. 2003. N 13. Р. 1–30.
Epstein S. Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality / eds T. Millon, M. J. Lerner // Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology. Vol. 5: Personality and Social Psychology. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley & Sons, 2003. P. 159–184.
Betsch T. The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making / eds H. Plessner, C. Betsch, T. Betsch // Intuition in judgement and decision making. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 2008. P. 3–22.
Stanovich K. E., West R. F. Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2000. Vol. 23. P. 645–726.
Канеман Д. Контуры ограниченной рациональности: возможность интуитивных суждений и выбора // Эковест. 2004. Т. 4, № 4. С. 540–592.
Leybourne S., Sadler-Smith E. The role of intuition and improvisation in project management // International Journal of Project Management. 2006. Vol. 24. P. 483–492.
Степаносова О. В. Интуитивные компоненты в процессе принятия решения: дис. … канд. психол. наук. М., 2004. 208 c.
Семенец О. В. Психологические детерминанты социальной интуиции личности в прогнозировании ситуации: автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук. Саратов. 2010. 24 с.
Регуш Л. А. Психология прогнозирования: успехи в познании будущего. СПб.: Речь, 2003. 352 с.
Корнилова Т. В., Корнилов С. А. Интуиция, интеллект и личностные свойства (результаты апробации шкал опросника С. Эпстайна) // Психологические исследования. 2013. Т. 6, № 28. С. 5. URL: http://psystudy.ru/ (дата обращения: 26.01.2015).
Люсин Д. В. Новая методика для измерения эмоционального интеллекта: опросник ЭмИн // Психологическая диагностика. 2006. № 4. С. 3–22.
References
Burke L. A., Miller M. K. Taking the mystery out of intuitive decision making. Academy of Management Executive, 1999, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 91–99.
Tutov L. A, Manasenko K. A. Intuitsiia kak faktor priniatiia organizatsionnykh reshenii: metodologicheskie aspekty problemy [Intuition as a factor in making organizational decisions: methodological aspects]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Ekonomika [Vestnik of Moscow University. Series 6. The Economy], 2008, issue 4, pp. 3–19. (In Russian)
Dane E., Pratt M. G. Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 2007, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 33–54.
Bechara A., Damasio H., Tranel D., Damasio A. R. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 1997, no. 275, pp. 1293–1295.
Damasio A. R. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1994. 312 p.
Bechara A., Damasio A. R., Damasio H., Anderson S. W. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 1994, vol. 50, issues 1-3, pp. 7–12.
Bechara A., Damasio A. R. The somatic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behaviour, 2005, no. 52 (2), pp. 336–372.
Hogarth R. M. Educating intuition: A challenge for the 21-st century. In Barcelona, Els Opuscles del CREI, 2003, no. 13, pp. 1–30.
Epstein S. Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology, vol. 5: Personality and Social Psychology. Eds. T. Millon, M. J. Lerner. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley and Sons, 2003, pp. 159–184.
Betsch T. The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. Intuition in judgement and decision making. Eds. H. Plessner, C. Betsch, T. Betsch. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 2008, pp. 3–22.
Stanovich K. E., West R. F. Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2000, vol. 23, pp. 645–726.
Kahneman D. Kontury ogranichennoi ratsional’nosti: vozmozhnost’ intuitivnykh suzhdenii i vybora [Maps of Bounded Rationality: A Perspective on Intuitive Judgment and Choice]. Ekovest [ECOWEST], 2004, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 540–592. (In Russian)
Leybourne S., Sadler-Smith E. The role of intuition and improvisation in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 2006, vol. 24, pp. 483–492.
Stepanosova O. V. Intuitivnye komponenty v protsesse priniatiia resheniia. Kand. diss. [Intuitive components in the decision-making process. PhD Diss.]. Moscow, 2004. 208 p. (In Russian)
Semenets O. V. Psikhologicheskie determinanty sotsial’noi intuitsii lichnosti v prognozirovanii situatsii. Avtoref. kand. diss. [Psychological determinants of social intuition to predict the individual situation. Thesis of PhD Diss.]. Saratov, 2010. 24 p. (In Russian)
Regush L. A. Psikhologiia prognozirovaniia: uspekhi v poznanii budushchego [Psychology of forecasting: success in the knowledge of the future]. St. Petersburg, 2003. 352 p. (In Russian)
Kornilova T. V., Kornilov S. A. [Intuition, intellect and personal property (results of testing scales questionnaire of S. Epstayn)]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia [Psychological research], 2013, vol. 6, no. 28, pp. 5. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/. 01/26/2015. (accessed 26.01.2015) (In Russian)
Lyusin D. V. Novaia metodika dlia izmereniia emotsional’nogo intellekta: oprosnik EmIn [A new technique for measuring of emotional intelligence: a questionnaire EmIn]. Psikhologicheskaia diagnostika[Psychological diagnostics], 2006, no. 4, pp. 3–22. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
2015-11-06
How to Cite
Маничев, С. А., & Смолко, С. А. (2015). EMOTIONAL COMPONENTS OF RATIONAL AND INTUITIVE THINKING STYLE IN MANAGEMENT DECISION MAKING. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, (3), 38–50. Retrieved from https://sociologyjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/1390
Issue
Section
GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY. PERSONAL PSYCHOLOGY. HISTORY OF PSYCHOLOGY
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
