Город и его жители: движение навстречу

Natalya V. Avdoshina; Julia V. Vaskina

doi:10.21638/spbu12.2023.207

Authors

Natalya V. Avdoshina Samara National Research University, 1, ul. Akademika Pavlova, Samara, 443011, Russian Federation
Julia V. Vaskina Samara National Research University, 1, ul. Akademika Pavlova, Samara, 443011, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2023.207

Abstract

This article is devoted to the analysis of attitude to the migration among residents of a large city with a population of more than 1 million people. There is also assessment of the impact from various factors of the urban environment both on the overall satisfaction with life in the city and on the desire to change the place of residence. The survey of Samara residents was conducted online with the help of a questionnaire created in a Google Docs and posted on the city administration website. 1,500 respondents were interviewed in according to the quota sample (quota characteristics are gender and age). The sampling error was 3%. It was revealed that a significant contribution to the overall satisfaction with life in the city is made by the following urban environment parameters: safety, landscaping, the work of cultural and leisure institutions, the quality and quantity of goods in the stores. The strongest correlations with the desire to leave Samara or stay in it were found in the variables “schools quality of work”, “city safety”, “institutions of additional education quality of work”, “quality and quantity of goods”, and “garbage disposal”. Speaking of the socio-demographic groups with the greatest desire to leave the city were revealed young people (49.6%), as well as the highest-income group of respondents, due to their desire to improve the quality of life along with the lowest-income group, striving to change their place in order to solve their economic problems. If we take social status into account, the largest share of those wishing to leave the city was revealed among entrepreneurs, self-employed and heads of organizations. It is concluded that for potential Samara migrants it is important notto get rid of existing problems, but rather to expand their opportunities to improve the quality of life.

Keywords:

city, migration, satisfaction with life in the city, residents’ satisfaction with various aspects of the urban environment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Миграция россиян внутри страны обнуляет регионы // ДемоскопWeekly. 2022. № 963–964. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2022/0963/gazeta04.php (дата обращения: 17.02.2022).

Вакуленко Е.С. Мотивы внутренней миграции населения в России: что изменилось в последние годы? // Прикладная эконометрика. 2019. Т. 55. С. 113–138.

Gerber T. Regional migration dynamics in Russia since the collapse of communism. Tucson: University of Arizona, 2000.

Gerber T. Regional economic performance and net migration rates in Russia, 1993–2002 // International Migration Review. 2006. Vol. 40, no. 3. Р. 661–697.

Коровкин А.Г. Динамика занятости и рынка труда: вопросы макроэкономического анализа и прогнозирования. М.: МАКС Пресс, 2001.

Andrienko Yu., Guriev S.* Determinants of interregional mobility in Russia. Evidence from paneldata // Economics of Transition. 2004. Vol. 12, no. 1. Р. 1–27.

Guriev S.*, Vakulenko E. Breaking out of poverty traps: Internal migration and interregional convergence in Russia // Journal of Comparative Economics. 2015. No. 43. Р. 633–649.

Ощепков A.Ю. Межрегиональная миграция: равновесный подход: исследовательский грант Научного фонда ГУ-ВШЭ (рукопись). 2008

Kumo K. Interregional migration: Analysis of origin-to-destination matrix // Demography of Russia. Studies in Economic Transition. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Р. 261–314.

Wang L., Huang J., Cai H., Liu H., Lu J., Yang L. A study of the socioeconomic factors influencing migration in Russia // Sustainability. 2019. No. 11. Р. 1650.

Батищева Г.А. Исследование внутренней миграции в России // Terra Economicus (Экономический вестник Ростовского государственного университета). 2009. Т. 7, № 2. С. 130–135.

Как в России обстоят дела с внутренней миграцией // Российская газета. 10.01.2018. URL: https://rg.ru/2018/01/10/kak-v-rossii-obstoiat-dela-s-vnutrennej-migraciej.html (дата обращения: 20.02.2022).

Зайончковская Ж.А., Ноздрина Н.Н. Миграционная подвижность населения России и ее территориальная дифференциация (по результатам обследования в 10 городах) // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2008. № 4. С. 98–111.

Мкртчян Н.В. Почему люди уезжают из одних регионов и приезжают в другие: мотивы межрегиональной миграции в России // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 5. URL: https://monitoringjournal.ru/index.php/monitoring/article/view/1619 (дата обращения: 20.02.2022).

Чурсина Ю. «Уехать от» vs «Уехать для». Качество городской среды как фактор миграционных установок населения // Социология власти. 2014. № 2. С. 142–164.

* Признан на территории Российской Федерации иностранным агентом

References

Migration of Russians within the country resets the regions. Demoscop Weekly, 2022, no. 1. Available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2022/0963/gazeta04.php (accessed: 17.02.2022). (In Russian)

Vakulenko E.S. Motives for internal migration in Russia: what has changed in recent years? Prikladnaia ekonometrika, 2019, vol. 55, pp. 113–138. (In Russian)

Gerber T. Regional migration dynamics in Russia since the collapse of communism. Tucson, University of Arizona, 2000.

Gerber T. Regional economic performance and net migration rates in Russia, 1993–2002. International Migration Review, 2006, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 661–697.

Korovkin A.G. Employment and Labor Market Dynamics: Issues of Macroeconomic Analysis and Forecasting. Мoscow, MAKS Press, 2001. (In Russian)

Andrienko Yu., Guriev S.* Determinants of interregional mobility in Russia. Evidence from panel data. Economics of Transition, 2004, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–27.

Guriev S.*, Vakulenko E. Breaking out of poverty traps: Internal migration and interregional convergence in Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2015, no. 43, pp. 633–649.

Oshсhepkov A.Ju. Interregional migration: an equilibrium approach. Research grant from the HSE Science Foundation (manuscript). 2008.

Kumo K. Interregional migration: Analysis of origin-to-destination matrix. Demography of Russia. Studies in Economic Transition. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 261–314.

Wang L., Huang J., Cai H., Liu H., Lu J., Yang L. A study of the socioeconomic factors influencing migration in Russia. Sustainability, 2019, no. 11, pp. 1650.

Batishheva G.A. Study of internal migration in Russia. Terra Economicus (Economic Herald of Rostov State University), 2009, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 130–135. (In Russian)

How are things going with internal migration in Russia? Rossijskaia gazeta, 2018, 10.01. Available at: https://rg.ru/2018/01/10/kak-v-rossii-obstoiat-dela-s-vnutrennej-migraciej.html (accessed: 20.02.2022). (In Russian)

Zajonchkovskaja Zh. A., Nozdrina N.N. Migration mobility of the population of Russia and its territorial differentiation (according to the results of a survey in 10 cities). Problems of Forecasting, 2008, no. 4, pp. 98–111. (In Russian)

Mkrtchjan N.V. Why do people leave some regions and come to others: motives for interregional migration in Russia. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 2020, no. 5. Available at: https://monitoringjournal.ru/index.php/monitoring/article/view/1619 (accessed: 20.02.2022). (In Russian)

Chursina Ju. “Leave from” vs “Leave for”. The quality of the urban environment as a factor in the migration attitudes of the population. Sociology of Power, 2014, no. 2, pp. 142–164. (In Russian)

* Is recognized as a foreign agent in Russian Federation.