Hard-to-reach respondents: Sampling experience

Authors

  • Maria N. Yashina St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Evgenia V. Shishkina St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Konstantin Yu. Belousov Saint Petersburg Academy of Postgraduate Pedagogical Education, 11–13, ul. Lomonosova, St. Petersburg, 191002, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0663-3717

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2024.201

Abstract

The article describes the problems of selecting male informants raising children under 18 in qualitative research. The material of the article is based on the analysis of the authors’ research experience, as well as theoretical elaboration of the category “hard-to-reach group”. The experience of working with three groups of informants — single fathers, stepfathers, and fathers from orphanage graduates — is analyzed. Their representatives are considered as hard to reach, hidden, vulnerable. Single fathers belong to a small group, but it is more institutionalized than other groups of fathers, which greatly facilitates the search for its representatives, allowing for the implementation of the selection method on the basis of institutions. Stepfathers are characterized by high heterogeneity and difficulties with identification. The sensitivity of the research topic implies a high level of trust in those through whom contact is established. Fathers who are graduates from children’s homes are few, difficult to identify, and vulnerable. These features were reflected in the way the sample was constructed — with a prioritized choice of combined strategies. The authors provide a detailed description of the specifics of recruiting and strategies for finding informants, considering the specifics of selection on the basis of different types of institutions, targeted selection through social networks of researchers, and the “snowball” method. The barriers that arise in the selection of different groups of male informants are analyzed, in particular the quantitative composition of the group, physical concentration, level of institutionalization, and trust. Factors that enhance the effectiveness of informant recruitment for each group are characterized, as well as risk factors, including those related to the motivation of participants and the role of the researcher herself.

Keywords:

hard-to-reach, hidden, vulnerable populations, men, single fathers, stepfathers, fathers from orphanages graduates, facility based sentinel surveillance, targeted sampling

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Freimuth V. S., Mettger W. Is there a hard-to-reach audience? // Public Health Reports. 1990. Vol. 105 (3). Р. 232–238.

Яковлева А.А. Исследования в труднодоступных группах: опыт использования выборки, управляемой респондентом и выборки «место-время» // Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование. 2011. № 33. С. 57–79.

Boag-Munroe G., Evangelou M. From hard to reach to how to reach: A systematic review of the literature on hard-to-reach families // Research Papers in Education. 2012. Vol. 27 (2). Р. 209–239.

Brackertz N. Who is hard to reach and why? // ISR Working Paper. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314283998_Who_is_hard_to_reach_and_why (дата обращения: 10.10.2023).

Ellard-Gray A., Jeffrey N.K., Choubak M., Crann S.E. Finding the hidden participant: Solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations // International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2015. Vol. 33; no. 13. Р. 1189–1202.

Несмеянова С.Э., Калинина Е.Г. Концепция уязвимости отдельных групп лиц: международный и национальный опыт // Конституционное право. 2017. № 4. С. 7–12.

Алисиевич Е.С. К вопросу об определении понятия «уязвимые группы» в международном праве человека // Евразийский юридический журнал. 2013. № 1. С. 29–33.

Kalton G. Methods for oversampling rare subpopulations in social surveys // Survey Methodology. 2009. Vol. 35 (2). Р. 125–141.

Tourangeau R., Edwards B., Johnson T.P., Wolter K.M., Bates N., eds. Hard-to-Survey Populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Davies L. Are young fathers “hard to reach”? Understanding the importance of relationship building and service sustainability // Journal of Children’s Service. 2016. Vol. 11; no. 4. Р. 317–329.

Bamidele O., McGarvey H., Lagan B.M., Chinegwundoh F., Nasreen A., McCaughan E. “Hard to reach, but not out of reach”: Barriers and facilitators to recruiting Black African and Black Caribbean men with prostate cancer and their partners into qualitative research // European Journal of Cancer Care. 2018. 1–11. Article ECC12977. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12977

Елсукова Н.А. Методология социологического изучения труднодоступных групп населения: автореф. дис. … канд. социол. наук. Минск, 2007.

Brick J.M., Williams D. Reasons for increasing nonresponse in U. S. household surveys // Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2013. Vol. 645 (1). Р. 36–59.

Firchow P., Mac Ginty R. Including hard-to-access populations using mobile phone surveys and participatory indicators // Sociological Research & Methods. 2017. Vol. 49 (1). Р. 133–160.

Ellis R. What do we mean by a “hard-to-reach” population? Legitimacy versus precarity as barriers to access sociological methods and research // Sociological Methods and Research. 2023. Vol. 52 (3), August. Р. 1556–1586.

В Санкт-Петербурге стало больше отцов-одиночек // Федерал пресс. URL: https://fedpress.ru/news/78/society/3153811 (дата обращения: 15.10.2023).

Gallegos D., Durham J., Rutter C., McKechnie R. Working towards the active participation of underrepresented populations in research: A scoping review and thematic synthesis // Health & Social Care in the Community. 2023. Vol. 2023. Article ID 1312525. Р. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1312525

Суд уточнил, когда у пасынков возникает обязанность по содержанию мачех и отчимов // Российское агентство правовой и судебной информации. URL: https://rapsinews.ru/judicial_analyst/20230515/308912100 (дата обращения: 17.10.2023).

Зубарева О.Г. Правовой статус пасынков (падчериц) и отчима (мачехи): условия реализации имущественных прав и обязанностей // Журнал российского права. 2006. № 3 (111). С. 111–120.

Белоусов К.Ю., Матюшкина М.Д., Рыбаков В.В., Яшина М.Н. Участие родителей в школьной жизни и их оценка качества образовательного процесса // Перспективы науки и образования. 2021. № 6 (54). С. 300–316.

Агапова О.В., Нам И.П., Яни И.В. Постинтернатная адаптация выпускников детских домов // Адаптация к условиям самостоятельного проживания выпускников организаций для детей-сирот и детей, оставшихся без попечения родителей [Социальное обслуживание семей и детей: научнометодический сборник] / под ред. Ю.Ю. Ивашкиной, О.В. Костейчука. Вып. 4. СПб.: Городской информационно-методический центр «Семья», 2015. С. 104–111.

Bonevski B., Randell M., Paul C., Chapman K., Twyman L., Bryant J., Brozek I., Hughes C. Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups // Medical Research Methodology. 2014. Vol. 14, no. 1. Р. 14–42.

References

Freimuth, V. S., Mettger, W. . Is there a hard-to-reach audience? Public Health Reports, 1990, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 232–238.

Yakovleva, A.A. . Research in hard-to-reach groups: experience with respondent-driven and placetime sampling. Sotsiologiia: metodologiia, metody, matematicheskie modeli (Sotsiologia: 4M), 2011, no. 33, pp. 57–79. (In Russian)

Boag-Munroe, G., Evangelou, M. From hard to reach to how to reach: A systematic review of the literature on hard-to-reach families. Research Papers in Education, 2012, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 209–239.

Brackertz, N. Who is hard to reach and why? ISR Working Paper. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314283998_Who_is_hard_to_reach_and_why (accessed: 10.10.2023).

Ellard-Gray, A., Jeffrey, N.K., Choubak, M., Crann, S.E. Finding the hidden participant: Solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2015, vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 1189–1202.

Nesmeyanova, S.E., Kalinina, E.G. The concept of vulnerability of certain groups of persons: International and national experience. Constitutsionnoe Pravo, 2017, no. 4, pp. 7–12. (In Russian)

Alisievich, E. S. On the definition of the concept of “vulnerable groups” in international human rights law. Evraziiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal, 2013, no. 1, pp. 29–33. (In Russian)

Kalton, G. Methods for oversampling rare subpopulations in social surveys. Survey Methodology, 2009, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 125–141.

Tourangeau, R. Edwards, B., Johnson, T.P., Wolter, K.M., Bates, N., eds. Hard-to-Survey Populations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Davies, L. Are young fathers “hard to reach”? Understanding the importance of relationship building and service sustainability. Journal of Children’s Service, 2016, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 317–329.

Bamidele, O., McGarvey, H., Lagan, B.M., Chinegwundoh, F., Nasreen, A., McCaughan, E. “Hard to reach, but not out of reach”: Barriers and facilitators to recruiting Black African and Black Caribbean men with prostate cancer and their partners into qualitative research. European Journal of Cancer Care, 2018, 1–11, article ECC12977. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12977

Elsukova, N.A. Methodology of sociological study of hard-to-reach population groups: diss. thesis in sociology. Minsk, 2007. (In Russian)

Brick, J.M., Williams, D. Reasons for increasing nonresponse in U.S. household surveys. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2013, vol. 645, no. 1, pp. 36–59.

Firchow, P., Mac Ginty, R. Including hard-to-access populations using mobile phone surveys and participatory indicators. Sociological Research & Methods, 2017, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 133–160.

Ellis, R. What do we mean by a “hard-to-reach” population? Legitimacy versus precarity as barriers to access sociological methods and research. Sociological Methods and Research, 2023, vol. 52, no. 3, August, pp. 1556–1586.

Here are more single fathers in St. Petersburg. Federal Press. Available at: https://fedpress.ru/news/78/society/3153811 (accessed: 15.10.2023). (In Russian)

Gallegos, D., Durham, J., Rutter, C., McKechnie, R. Working towards the Active Participation of Underrepresented Populations in Research: A Scoping Review and Thematic Synthesis. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2023, vol. 2023, article ID 1312525, pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1312525

The court clarified when stepchildren have an obligation to support stepmothers and stepfathers. Russian Agency for Legal and Judicial Information. Available at: https://rapsinews.ru/judicial_analyst/20230515/308912100 (accessed: 17.10.2023). (In Russian)

Zubareva, O.G. Legal status of stepsons (stepdaughters) and stepfather (stepmother): Conditions for the implementation of property rights and obligations. Journal of Russian Law, 2006, no. 3 (111), pp. 111–120. (In Russian)

Belousov, K.Yu., Matyushkina, M.D., Rybakov, V.V., Yashina, M.N. Parents’ participation in school life and their assessment of the quality of the educational process. Perspectives of Science & Education, 2021, no. 6 (54), pp. 300–316. (In Russian)

Agapova, O.V., Nam, I.P., Yani, I.V. Post-international adaptation of graduates of orphanages. Adaptation to the conditions of independent living of graduates of organizations for orphans and children left without parental care [Social services for families and children: A scientific and methodological collection], Yu.Yu. Ivashkina, O.V. Kosteychuk (eds). Vol. 4. St. Petersburg: SPbGBU “City information and methodological Center ‘Family’”, 2015, pp. 104–111. (In Russian)

Bonevski, B., Randell, M., Paul, C., Chapman, K., Twyman, L., Bryant, J., Brozek, I., Hughes, C. Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. Medical Research Methodology, 2014, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 14–42.

Published

2025-01-17

How to Cite

Yashina, M. N., Shishkina, E. V., & Belousov, K. Y. (2025). Hard-to-reach respondents: Sampling experience. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 17(2), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2024.201

Issue

Section

Theory and methodology of sociology