Social media in local environmental conflicts

Authors

  • Vladimir B. Golbraich The Sociological Institute of the RAS — Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the RAS, 25/14, 7-ya Krasnoarmeyskaya ul., St. Petersburg, 190005, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2380-2666

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.405

Abstract

Social networks have become an everyday phenomenon, performing the functions of interpersonal communication, entertainment, education, and news consumption. In this regard, social media is becoming an essential factor in political and public life, as well as one of the most important resources for social movements. This study focuses on how initiative groups in modern Russia (based on the example of the social network VKontakte) use social media during local environmental conflicts (to attract citizens to problematic situations and mobilize them). The study used a content analysis of virtual groups created in connection with local environmental conflicts, and a survey was conducted of the most active members of virtual groups and their leaders. The study identified the main functions performed by virtual groups (information, mobilization, etc.); the use of various resources groups (visual, etc.); use of various information sources (traditional media; social media, etc.). The digital participation of virtual groups’ members was analyzed, as well as the traditional political participation of the most active group members. The study illustrated the active use of groups for mobilization. At the same time, the analysis revealed low digital participation of social media users. Also, the results of the analysis showed that the majority of respondents, which could be attributed to the most active of the group members, also took part in traditional forms (rallies, pickets, public hearings, etc.). The study demonstrated that most group leaders believed that virtual groups contributed significantly to the mobilization of potential supporters during a conflict.

Keywords:

social media, local environmental conflicts, mobilization

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Global digital population as of October 2018 (in millions). URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide (дата обращения: 25.05.2019).

Волков Д., Гончаров С. Российский медиаландшафт: основные тенденции использования СМИ. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2017/08/22/16440 (дата обращения: 25.05.2019).

Margetts H., John P., Hale S., Yasseri T. Political Turbulence. How Social Media Shape Collective Action. Princeton: Princenton University press, 2016. 304 p.

Theocharis Y., Lowe W., van Deth J., Albacete G. Using Twitter to Mobilise Protest Action: Transnational Online Mobilisation Patterns and Action Repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados and Aganaktismenoi movements // Information, Communication & Society. 2015. Vol. 18, no. 2. P. 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035.

Theocharis Y. The Conceptualization of Digitally Networked Participation // Social Media + Society. 2015. July-December. P. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610140.

Housley W., Webb H., Williams M., Procter R., Edwards A., Jirotka M., Burnap P., Stahl B., Rana O., Williams M. Interaction and Transformation on Social Media: The Case of Twitter Campaigns // Social Media + Society. 2018. January-March. P. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117750721.

Шерстобитов А. С. «Сетевая публичность» как новый фактор политической мобилизации в современной России: попытка сетевого анализа // Вестник С.-Петерб. ун-та. Сер. 6. 2013. Вып. 3. С. 99–105.

Добринская Д. Е. Сообщества в эпоху Интернета // Вестник Моск. ун-та. Сер. 18. Социология и политология. 2018. № 4. С. 59–79. https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-4-59-79.

Mosconi G., Korn M., Reuter C., Tolmie P., Teli M., Pipek V. From Facebook to the Neighbourhood: Infrastructuring of Hybrid Community Engagement // Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 2017. Vol. 26, no. 4–6. P. 959–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9291-z.

Цепилова О. Д. Общественные движения в районе экологического бедствия: история возникновения, развитие, социальные последствия (на примере г. Кириши) // Журн. cоциол. и соц. антропол. 2002. № 1. С. 61–90.

Гончаров В., Нечай В. Антикоррупционные протесты 2017: отражение в «Твиттере» // Полития. 2018. № 1 (88). С. 65–81. https://doi: 10.30570/2078-5089-2018-88-1-65-81.

Павлов А. В. Локальные городские сообщества в социальных сетях между «соседской» и «гражданской» коммуникацией // Лабиринт. Журн. соц.-гуманит. исслед. 2016. № 5. С. 46–57.

Сибирев В., Головин Н., Клебанов А. Сетевые сообщества в борьбе вокруг решения передать Исаакиевский собор Русской православной церкви (январь-июнь 2017 года) // Мониторинг общ. мнения. 2018. № 1 (143). С. 296–317. https://doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.1.15.

Katz-Kimchi M., Manosevitch I. Mobilizing Facebook Users against Facebook's Energy Policy: The Case of Greenpeace Unfriend Coal Campaign // Environmental communication. 2015. Vol. 9, no. 2. P. 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.993413.

Russmann U., Svensson J. Introduction to Visual Communication in the Age of Social Media: Conceptual, Theoretical and Methodological Challenges // Media and Communication. 2017. Vol. 5, no. 4. P. 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i4.1263.

Wetzstein I. The Visual Discourse of Protest Movements on Twitter: The Case of Hong Kong 2014 // Media and Communication. 2017. Vol. 5, no. 4. P. 26–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i4.1020

Цепилова О. Д. Политическое и социально-экономическое развитие современной России: экологические ограничения и риски // Телескоп: журн. социол. и маркетинг. исслед. 2019. № 2. С. 20–27. https://doi: 10.33491/telescope2019.203.

Экологические конфликты в российских регионах. Аналитический обзор. URL: http://old.fpp.spb.ru/fpp-eco_2013-02.php (дата обращения: 25.05.2019).

Сабадаш В. В. Теоретико-методологические аспекты исследования экологического конфликта в современной системе природопользования // Экономика природопользования. 2009. № 6. С. 10–22.


References

Global digital population as of October 2018 (in millions). Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide (accessed: 25.05.2019).

Volkov D., Goncharov S. Russian Medial Landscape: Main Media Usage Trends. 2017. Available at: https://www.levada.ru/2017/08/22/16440 (accessed: 25.05.2019). (In Russian)

Margetts H., John P., Hale S., Yasseri T. Political Turbulence. How Social Media Shape Collective Action. Princeton, Princenton University press, 2016. 304 p.

Theocharis Y., Lowe W., van Deth J., Albacete G. Using Twitter to Mobilise Protest Action: Transnational Online Mobilisation Patterns and Action Repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication & Society, 2015, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035.

Theocharis Y. The Conceptualization of Digitally Networked Participation. Social Media + Society, 2015, July-December, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610140.

Housley W., Webb H., Williams M., Procter R., Edwards A., Jirotka M., Burnap P., Stahl B., Rana O., Williams M. Interaction and Transformation on Social Media: The Case of Twitter Campaigns. Social Media + Society, 2018, January-March, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117750721.

Sherstobitov A. S. Network Publicity as a New Factor Political Mobilization in Modern Russia: Network Analysis attempt. Vestnik St. Peterb. un-ta. Ser. 6, 2013, no. 3, pp. 99–105. (In Russian)

Dobrinskaya D. Communities in the Age of Internet. Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Seriia 18. Sotsiologiia i politologiia, 2018, no. 4, pp. 59–79. https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-4-59-79. (In Russian)

Mosconi G., Korn M., Reuter C., Tolmie P., Teli M., Pipek V. From Facebook to the Neighbourhood: Infrastructuring of Hybrid Community Engagement. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2017, vol. 26, no. 4–6, pp. 959–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9291-z.

Tsepilova O. D. Social Movements in the Area of Ecological Disaster: the History of Emergence, Development, Social Consequences (Based on the Example of the City of Kirishi). Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsialnoi Antropologii, 2002, no. 1, pp. 61–90. (In Russian)

Goncharov V., Nechaj V. Anti-corruption Protests 2017: Reflection in Twitter. Politiya, 2018, no. 1 (88), рр. 65–81. https://doi: 10.30570/2078-5089-2018-88-1-65-81. (In Russian)

Pavlov A. V. Local City Communities in Social Networks: Between «Neighbor» and «Civil» Communication. Labirint. Zhurnal sotsial’no-gumanitarnykh issledovanii, 2016, no. 5, рр. 46–57. (In Russian)

Sibirev V. A., Golovin N. A., Klebanov A. A. Social media communities on the controversial decision to hand over St. Isaac’s Cathedral to the Russian Orthodox Church. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, 2018, no. 1 (143), рр. 296–317. https://doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.1.15. (In Russian)

Katz-Kimchi M., Manosevitch I. Mobilizing Facebook Users against Facebook's Energy Policy: The Case of Greenpeace Unfriend Coal Campaign. Environmental communication, 2015, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.993413.

Russmann U., Svensson J. Introduction to Visual Communication in the Age of Social Media: Conceptual, Theoretical and Methodological Challenges. Media and Communication, 2017, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i4.1263.

Wetzstein I. The Visual Discourse of Protest Movements on Twitter: The Case of Hong Kong 2014. Media and Communication, 2017, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 26–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i4.1020.

Tsepilova O. D. The Process of Convergence of Different Social Systems as a Trend of Modernity. Teleskop: zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh i marketingovykh issledovanii, 2019, no. 2, pp. 20–27. https://doi:10.33491/telescope2019.203. (In Russian)

Environmental conflicts in Russian regions. Analytical Review, 2013. Available at: http://old.fpp.spb.ru/fpp-eco_2013-02.php (accessed: 25.05.2019). (In Russian)

Sabadash V. V. Theoretical and methodological aspects of the study of environmental conflict in the modern environmental management system. Ekonomika prirodopolzovaniia, 2009, no. 6, pp. 10–22. (In Russian)

Published

2019-12-04

How to Cite

Golbraich, V. B. . (2019). Social media in local environmental conflicts. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 12(4), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.405

Issue

Section

Social Problems of the Russian Society