Game streams and let’s play: Perspectives of a sociological analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2020.407Abstract
The article provides an overview of research devoted to the popular practice of watching game streams and let’s play. The goal is to outline the “points of growth” for sociological analytics of the new field. Streams and let’s play videos are divided according to the criterion of online and offline communication: streams are created and shown synchronously online, and let’s play videos are recorded and edited offline. Today, both of these kinds of videos are integrated into the computer game industry, and the emergence of comments for the public date back to television shows. Based on the research results, it is possible to speak about the social structure of streams and let’s play videos — the leading role of the gamer or commentator and the community that is developing around his channel. Although the text of a computer game is the basis for comments, it still does not cover the entire topic of communication between a streamer/let’s play creator and the audience. Analysts think that computer game commenting is a form of resistance to the direct consumption of a computer game. The comment content often reflects not only the gaming experience, but the current agenda — politics, economics, and popular culture. Thus, the most popular streamers/let’s play creators become opinion leaders, their status is similar to that of other media celebrities who are at the center of a parasocial relationship. Viewers of game streams/let’s play videos form online communities with
common interests, skills, and knowledge. Immersion in one information environment, understanding of its language and other symbols strengthens the feeling of belonging to a group of “friends”. The author’s contribution consists in the systematization of the research experience on the problems of social aspects of commenting on computer games and in substantiating the sociological approach to this practice as a space for the life of new teams.
Keywords:
computer games, streams, let’s play, online communities
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Kerttula T. “What an Eccentric Performance!” Storytelling in Online Let’s Plays // Games and Culture Online First. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1555412016678724 (дата обращения: 07.08.2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016678724.
Kerttula T. The foundations of Let’s Play — Live action representation of video games in television and online 1975–2018 // GamiFIN Conference. 2019. P. 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818187.2818283.
Nylund N. Walkthrough and Let’s Play. Evaluating Preservation Methods for Digital Games // AcademicMindTrek’15: Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference. 2015. P. 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818187.2818283.
Fjællingsdal K. S. Let’s Play: A Modern Social Gaming Dimension? Exploring a “New” Aspect of the Gamer as a Social Entity. URL: https://mafiadoc.com/lets-play-a-modern-social-gaming-dimension_5cba1f-11097c47eb6a8b4579.html (дата обращения: 07.08.2020). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010022226639.
Burwell C., Miller T. Let’s Play: Exploring literacy practices in an emerging videogame paratext. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2042753016677858 (дата обращения: 07.08.2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753016677858.
Селютин А. А. Особенности дискурса видеостримов жанра «летсплей» // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. Филологические науки. 2019. Вып. 116, № 4 (426). С. 170–175. https://doi.org/10.24411/1994-2796-2019-10423.
Fjællingsdal К. S. Let’s Graduate — A thematic analysis of the Let’s Play phenomenon: Dissertation for a master’s degree. Trondheim, 2014. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5008.3605.
Суходимцева А. П., Суходимцев П. А. Профессия киберспортивного комментатора как социальное явление // International scientific review. 2016. № 11 (21). С. 132–134.
Wright P. C., Obrist М., Smith T. Live-streaming changes the (video) game // EuroITV’13. Como, Italy. Р. 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1145/2465958.2465971.
Glas R. Vicarious play: Engaging the viewer in Let’s Play videos. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication. 2015. № 5. Р. 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.10.3.219_1.
Park N., Jung Y., Lee K. M. Intention to upload video content on the internet: The role of social norms and ego-involvement // Computers in Human Behavior. 2011. № 27. Р. 1996–2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.006.
Rheingold H. The Virtual Community. URL: http://www.rheingold.com/vc/book (дата обращения: 08.09.2020).
Тальнишних Н. К. Культура «сетевых сообществ»: дис. … канд. филос. наук. Ростов н/Д., 2004. 128 с.
Кастельс М. Галактика Интернет. Екатеринбург: У-Фактория, 2004. 328 с.
Бондаренко С. В. Социальная структура виртуальных сетевых сообществ. Ростов н/Д. : Изд-во Ростовского госуниверситета, 2004. 396 с.
Войскунский А. Е., Евдокименко А. С., Федунина Н. Ю. Сетевая и реальная идентичность: сравнительное исследование // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2013. Т. 10, № 2. С. 98–121.
Moibus M., Quoc-Anh D. Social capital in social networks. URL: http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/cgsd/documents/rosenblat.pdf (дата обращения: 08.09.2020).
Ярская-Смирнова В. Р., Печенкин В. В., Решетников Д. С. Визуализация сетевой структуры групповых отношений в контексте анализа социальной сплоченности // Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование (4М). 2014. № 39. С. 40–61.
Текутьева И. А. Жанрово-тематическая классификация видеоблогинга // Медиасреда. 2016. № 11. С. 107–113.
Bartsch A., Viehoff R. The Use of Media Entertainment and Emotional Gratification // Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010. № 5. Р. 2247–2255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.444
Chiu C.-M., Hsu M.-H., Wang E. T. G. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories // Decision Support Systems. 2006. № 42. P. 1872–1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001.
Stever G. S. Parasocial and social interaction with celebrities: Classification of media fans // Journal of Media Psychology. 2009. № 14 (3). Р. 1–39.
Stever G. S. Fan behavior and lifespan development theory: Explaining para-social and social attachment to celebrities // Journal of Adult Development. 2011. № 18 (1). Р. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-010-9100-0.
Cohen E. L. What makes good games go viral? The role of technology use, efficacy, emotion and enjoyment in players’ decisions to share a prosocial digital game // Computers in Human Behavior. 2013. № 33. Р. 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.013.
Lull J. Media, Communication, Culture: A Global Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000. 207 р.
Kannan P. K., Chang A-M., Whinston A. B. Electronic Communities in E-Business: Their Role and Issues // Information Systems Frontiers. 2000. № 1 (4). Р. 415–426.
Spaulding T. How can virtual communities create value for business? // Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2010. № 9. Р. 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.004.
Blanchard A. L., Markus M. L. Sense of Virtual Community — Maintaining the Experience of Belonging. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224075991_Sense_of_virtual_community_-_maintaining_the_experience_of_belonging (дата обращения: 07.08.2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2002.994449.
De Valck K., van Bruggen G. H., Wierenga B. Virtual communities: A marketing perspective // Decision Support Systems. 2009. № 47. Р. 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.008.
Tonteri L., Kosonen M., Ellonen H-K., Tarkiainen A. Antecedents of an experienced sense of virtual community // Computers in Human Behavior. 2011. № 27. Р. 2215–2223. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202.
Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes // Human Relations. 1954. № 7 (2). Р. 117–140.
Haines R. Group development in virtual teams: An experimental reexamination // Computers in Human Behavior. 2014. № 39. Р. 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.019.
Hargittai E., Walejko G. The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age // Information, Communication & Society. 2008. № 11 (2). Р. 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946150.
Gekker A. Let’s not play: Interpassivity as resistance in ‘Let’s Play’ videos // Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds. Vol. 10, № 3. Р. 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.10.3.219_1.
Pfaller R. Interpassivity: The Aesthetics of Delegated Enjoyment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017. 160 р.
Schölzel H. Backing away from circles of control: A re-reading of interpassivity theory’s perspectives on the current political culture of participation // Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication. 2017. № 8. Р. 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.8.2.187_1.
Van Oenen G. Interpassivity revisited: a critical and historical reappraisal of interpassive phenomena. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Interpassivity-revisited%3A-a-critical-and-historical-Oenen/793dcb29e139ef21512ce62d7ab0f416e174e947 (дата обращения: 07.08.2020).
Zizek S. Cyberspace, or, How to Traverse the Fantasy in the Age of the Retreat of the Big Other // Public Culture. № 10. P. 483–513.
Chun W. H. K. Control and Freedom: Power and Paranoia in the Age of Fiber Optics. London: The MIT Press, 2008. 352 р.
References
Kerttula T. “What an Eccentric Performance!” Storytelling in Online Let’s Plays. Games and Culture Online First. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1555412016678724 (accessed: 07.08.2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016678724.
Kerttula T. The foundations of Let’s Play — Live action representation of video games in television and online 1975–2018. GamiFIN Conference, 2019, pp. 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818187.2818283.
Nylund N. Walkthrough and Let’s Play. Evaluating Preservation Methods for Digital Games. AcademicMindTrek’15: Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, 2015, pp. 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818187.2818283.
Fjællingsdal K. S. Let’s Play: A Modern Social Gaming Dimension? Exploring a “New” Aspect of the Gamer as a Social Entity. Available at: https://mafiadoc.com/lets-play-a-modern-social-gaming-dimension_5cba1f11097c47eb6a8b4579.html (accessed: 07.08.2020). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010022226639.
Burwell C., Miller T. Let’s Play: Exploring literacy practices in an emerging videogame paratext. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2042753016677858 (accessed: 07.08.2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753016677858.
Selyutin A. Peculiarities of discourse in video streams of “Let’s Play” genre. Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki, 2019, iss. 116, no. 4 (426), pp. 170–175. https://doi.org/10.24411/1994-2796-2019-10423. (In Russian)
Fjællingsdal К. S. Let’s Graduate — A thematic analysis of the Let’s Play phenomenon. Dissertation for a master’s degree. Trondheim, 2014. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG. 2.1.5008.3605.
Sukhodimtseva A. P., Sukhodimtsev P. A. The profession of an e-sports commentator as a social phenomenon. International scientific review, 2016, no. 11 (21), pp. 132–134. (In Russian)
Wright P. C., Obrist М., Smith T. Live-streaming changes the (video) game. EuroITV’13, 2013, pp. 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1145/2465958.2465971.
Glas R. Vicarious play: Engaging the viewer in Let’s Play videos. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 2015, no. 5, pp. 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.10.3.219_1.
Park N., Jung Y., Lee K. M. Intention to upload video content on the internet: The role of social norms and ego-involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, no. 27, pp. 1996–2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.006.
Rheingold H. The Virtual Community. Available at: http://www.rheingold.com/vc/book (accessed: 08.03.2020).
Tal’nishnikh N. K. Kul’tura «setevykh soobshchestv». Ph.D. thesis. Rostov-na-Donu, 2004. 128 р. (In Russian)
Castells M. The Internet Galaxy. Ekaterinburg, U-Faktoriia Publ., 2004. 328 р. (In Russian)
Bondarenko S. V. Social structure of the virtual network societies. Rostov-na-Donu, Rostovskii gosudarstvennii universitet Publ., 2004. 320 р. (In Russian)
Voiskunsky A. E., Evdokimenko A. S., Fedunina N. Iu. Online and real-life identity: A comparative study. Psykhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2013, vol. 10, no. 2, рр. 98–121. (In Russian)
Moibus M., Quoc-Anh D. Social capital in social networks. Available at: http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/cgsd/documents/rosenblat.pdf (accessed: 08.09.2020).
Iarskaia-Smirnova V. R., Pechenkin V. V., Reshetnikov D. S. Visualization of group relations network structure in the context of social cohesion analysis. Sotsiologiia: metodologiia, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie (4M), 2014, no. 39, рр. 40–61. (In Russian)
Tekut’eva I. A. Genre-thematic classification of video blogging. Mediasreda, 2016, no. 11, рр. 107–113. (In Russian)
Bartsch A., Viehoff R. The Use of Media Entertainment and Emotional Gratification. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010, no. 5, pp. 2247–2255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.444.
Chiu C.-M., Hsu M.-H., Wang E. T. G. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 2006, no. 42, pp. 1872–1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001.
Stever G. S. Parasocial and social interaction with celebrities: Classification of media fans. Journal of Media Psychology, 2009, no. 14 (3), pp. 1–39.
Stever G. S. Fan behavior and lifespan development theory: Explaining para-social and social attachment to celebrities. Journal of Adult Development, 2011, no. 18 (1), pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-010-9100-0.
Cohen E. L. What makes good games go viral? The role of technology use, efficacy, emotion and enjoyment in players’ decisions to share a prosocial digital game. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, no. 33, pp. 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.013.
Lull J. Media, Communication, Culture: A Global Approach. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2000. 207 р.
Kannan P. K., Chang A.-M., Whinston A. B. Electronic Communities in E-Business: Their Role and Issues. Information Systems Frontiers, 2000, no. 1 (4), pp. 415–426.
Spaulding T. How can virtual communities create value for business? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2010, no. 9, pp. 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.004.
Blanchard A. L., Markus M. L. Sense of Virtual Community — Maintaining the Experience of Belonging. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224075991_Sense_of_virtual_community_-_maintaining_the_experience_of_belonging (accessed: 07.08.2020). https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1109%2FHICSS.2002.994449.
De Valck K., van Bruggen G. H., Wierenga, B. Virtual communities: A marketing perspective. Decision Support Systems, 2009, no. 47, pp. 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.008.
Tonteri L., Kosonen M., Ellonen H-K., Tarkiainen A. Antecedents of an experienced sense of virtual community. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, no. 27, pp. 2215–2223.
Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954, no. 7 (2), pp. 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202.
Haines R. Group development in virtual teams: An experimental reexamination. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, no. 39, pp. 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.019.
Hargittai E., Walejko G. The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society, 2008, no. 11 (2), pp. 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946150.
Gekker A. Let’s not play: Interpassivity as resistance in ‘Let’s Play’ videos. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 2018, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.10.3.219_1.
Pfaller R. Interpassivity: The Aesthetics of Delegated Enjoyment. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2017. 160 р.
Schölzel H. Backing away from circles of control: A re-reading of interpassivity theory’s perspectives on the current political culture of participation. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 2017, no. 8, pp. 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.8.2.187_1.
Van Oenen G. Interpassivity revisited: a critical and historical reappraisal of interpassive phenomena. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/793d/ 8cb29e139ef21512ce62d7ab0f416e174e947.pdf (accessed: 07.08.2020).
Zizek S. Cyberspace, or, How to Traverse the Fantasy in the Age of the Retreat of the Big Other. Public Culture, 1998, no. 10, рр. 483–513.
Chun W. H. K. Control and Freedom: Power and Paranoia in the Age of Fiber Optics. London, The MIT Press, 2008. 352 р.
Downloads
Published
2021-01-14
How to Cite
Zinovyeva , N. A. . (2021). Game streams and let’s play: Perspectives of a sociological analysis. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 13(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2020.407
Issue
Section
Language, Culture, Communication
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
