Uncertainty about artificial intelligence technology in Russian society

Authors

  • Elena E. Khabirova HSE University, 20, Myasnitskaya ul., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2021.305

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) already affects many areas of society today. On the one hand, it is often associated with fears around dystopian surveillance, total workplace automation, and other dangers. On the other hand, the notions that AI actively stimulates innovation and acts as a powerful tool for solving various social problems occupy a significant place in discussions. At the same time, the high level of uncertainty in relation to the latest technologies makes the question of AI’s future especially susceptible to definition and framing by certain influential social groups. In the current article, consideration of the issues of social construction of attitudes on the prospects of AI technology is explained by the relevance of the conflict shown in Russian realities between the population’s concern and ambitious legislative goal setting. Against the background of these poles of skeptical and progressive orientations, the positions of specialized scientists and business are no less interesting. They are forced to find a balance somewhere between these polarities in defending their own interests. The materials presented in the article summarize the results of previous studies, and also rely on the analysis of state documents in the field under study in order to present an overall picture of the development of technology. Based on the results of the study, directions for further deepening the sociological understanding of the processes taking place today in Russia concerning the development and
implementation of artificial intelligence are identified.

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, attitudes to technologies, uncertainty, Russian society

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

He J., Baxter S. L., Xu Jie, Xu Jim., Zhou X., Zhang K. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine // Nature medicine. 2019. Vol. 25 (1). P. 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0.

Кузнецов А. Г. Туманности нейросетей: «черные ящики» технологий и наглядные уроки непрозрачности алгоритмов // Социология власти. 2020. № 2 (32). С. 157–182. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-157-182.

Резаев А. В., Стариков В. С., Трегубова Н. Д. Социология в эпоху «искусственной социальности»: поиск новых оснований // Социологические исследования. 2020. № 2. С. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250008489-0.

Natale S., Ballatore A. Imagining the thinking machine: Technological myths and the rise of artificial intelligence // Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2017. Vol. 26 (1). P. 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517715164.

Chuan C.-H., Tsai W.-H., Cho S. Y. Framing artificial intelligence in American newspapers // AIES conference, 2019. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3306618.3314285 (дата обращения: 30.07.2021).

Fast E., Horvitz E. Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence // Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3298239.3298381 (дата обращения: 30.07.2021).

Elish M. C., Boyd D. Situating methods in the magic of big data and AI // Communication Monographs. 2018. Vol. 85. P. 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1375130.

Bory P. Deep new: The shifting narratives of artificial intelligence from Deep Blue to AlphaGo // Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2019. Vol. 25 (4). P. 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856519829679.

Laï M. C., Brian M., Mamzer M. F. Perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Findings from a qualitative survey study among actors in France // Journal of Translational Medicine. 2020. Vol. 18 (1). P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-02204-y.

Лукьянова Е. Д. Создание искусственного интеллекта: современные достижения и отложенные риски // Социологическая наука и социальная практика. 2019. № 1 (25). https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2019.7.1.6275.

Игнатьев В. И. И грядет «другой» актор… Становление техносубъекта в контексте движения к технологической сингулярности // Социология науки и технологий. 2019. № 1 (10). https://doi.org/10.24411/2079-0910-2019-10005.

Brennen J. S., Howard P. N., Nielsen R. K. An Industry-Led Debate: How UK Media Cover Artificial Intelligence. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. 2018. URL: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/industry-led-debate-how-uk-media-cover-artificial-intelligence (дата обращения: 30.07.2021).

Boyd D., Crawford K. Critical questions for big data // Information, Communication & Society. 2012. Vol. 15. P. 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.

Caruso L. Digital innovation and the fourth industrial revolution: epochal social changes? // AI & Society. 2018. Vol. 33. P. 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0736-1.

Horowitz M. C. Artificial Intelligence, International Competition, and the Balance of Power // Texas National Security Review. 2018. Vol. 1 (3). P. 37–57. https://doi.org/10.15781/T2639KP49.

Makridakis S. The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms // Futures. 2017. Vol. 90. P. 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006.

Carbonell J., Sánchez-Esguevillas A., Carro B. The role of metaphors in the development of technologies. The case of artificial intelligence // Futures. 2016. Vol. 84. P. 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.019.

Meyer U. The emergence of an envisioned future. Sensemaking in the case of “Industrie 4.0” in Germany // Futures. 2019. Vol. 109. P. 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.03.001.

Kazun A. D. Agenda-Setting in Russian Media // International Journal of Communication. 2020. Vol. 14. P. 4739–4759.

Kazun A. D., Semykina K. Presidential Elections 2018: The Struggle of Putin and Navalny for a Media Agenda // Problems of Post-Communism. 2020. Vol. 67 (6). P. 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1685893.

Jasanoff S., Kim S.-H. Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 2015.

Флигстин Н. Рынки как политика: политико-культурный подход к рыночным институтам // Экономическая социология. 2003. № 4 (1). С. 45–61.

Флигстин Н. Архитектура рынков: экономическая социология капиталистических обществ XXI века. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ, 2013.

Fligstein N., McAdam D. Toward a general theory of strategic action fields // Sociological theory. 2011. Vol. 29 (1). P. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x.

Pickersgill M. Epistemic modesty, ostentatiousness and the uncertainties of epigenetics: On the knowledge machinery of (social) science // The Sociological Review. 2016. Vol. 64. P. 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/2059-7932.12020.


References

He J., Baxter S. L., Xu Jie, Xu Jim., Zhou X., Zhang K. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nature medicine, 2019, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0.

Kuznetsov A. G. Nebulae of neural networks: “black boxes” of technologies and demonstrative lessons of the opacity of algorithms. Sotsiologiia vlasti, 2020, vol. 2, no. 32, pp. 157–182. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-157-182. (In Russian)

Rezaev A. V., Starikov V. S., Tregubova N. D. Sociology in the era of “artificial sociality”: the search for new foundations. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2020, vol. 2, pp. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250008489-0. (In Russian)

Natale S., Ballatore A. Imagining the thinking machine: Technological myths and the rise of artificial intelligence. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 2017, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517715164.

Chuan C.-H., Tsai W.-H., Cho S. Y. Framing artificial intelligence in American newspapers. In: AIES conference. 2019. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3306618.3314285 (accessed: 30.07.2021).

Fast E., Horvitz E. Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2016. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3298239.3298381 (accessed: 30.07.2021).

Elish M. C., Boyd D. Situating methods in the magic of big data and AI. Communication Monographs, 2018, vol. 85, pp. 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1375130.

Bory P. Deep new: The shifting narratives of artificial intelligence from Deep Blue to AlphaGo. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 2019, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856519829679.

Laï M. C., Brian M., Mamzer M. F. Perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Findings from a qualitative survey study among actors in France. Journal of Translational Medicine, 2020, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-02204-y.

Luk’ianova E. D. Artificial Intelligence Creation: Current Achievements and Delayed Risks. Sotsiologicheskaia nauka i sotsial’naia praktika, 2019, vol. 1, no. 25. https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2019.7.1.6275. (In Russian)

Ignat’ev V. I. And the “other” actor is coming … Formation of a technoactor in the context of the movement towards a technological singularity. Sotsiologiia nauki i tekhnologii, 2019, vol. 1, no. 10. https://doi.org/10.24411/2079-0910-2019-10005. (In Russian)

Brennen J. S., Howard P. N., Nielsen R. K. An Industry-Led Debate: How UK Media Cover Artificial Intelligence. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. 2018. Available at: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/industry-led-debate-how-uk-media-cover-artificial-intelligence (accessed: 30.07.2021).

Boyd D., Crawford K. Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 2012, vol. 15, pp. 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.

Caruso L. Digital innovation and the fourth industrial revolution: epochal social changes? AI. Society, 2018, vol. 33, pp. 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0736-1.

Horowitz M. C. Artificial Intelligence, International Competition, and the Balance of Power. Texas National Security Review, 2018, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 37–57. https://doi.org/10.15781/T2639KP49.

Makridakis S. The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 2017, vol. 90, pp. 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006.

Carbonell J., Sánchez-Esguevillas A., Carro B. The role of metaphors in the development of technologies. The case of artificial intelligence. Futures, 2016, vol. 84, pp. 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.019.

Meyer U. The emergence of an envisioned future. Sensemaking in the case of “Industrie 4.0” in Germany. Futures, 2019, vol. 109, pp. 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.03.001.

Kazun A. D. Agenda-Setting in Russian Media. International Journal of Communication, 2020, vol. 14, pp. 4739–4759.

Kazun A. D., Semykina K. Presidential Elections 2018: The Struggle of Putin and Navalny for a Media Agenda. Problems of Post-Communism, 2020, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1685893.

Jasanoff S., Kim S.-H. Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 2015.

Fligstein N. Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions. Ekonomicheskaia sotsiologiia, 2003, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45–61. (In Russian)

Fligstein N. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of 21st-Century Capitalist Societies. Rus. Ed. Moscow: HSE Publ., 2013. (In Russian)

Fligstein N., McAdam D. Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological theory, 2011, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x.

Pickersgill M. Epistemic modesty, ostentatiousness and the uncertainties of epigenetics: On the knowledge machinery of (social) science. The Sociological Review, 2016, vol. 64, pp. 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/2059-7932.12020.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-29

How to Cite

Khabirova, E. E. . (2022). Uncertainty about artificial intelligence technology in Russian society. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 14(3), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2021.305

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 3 (2021): Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Sociology

Section

Sociology of Knowledge, Science and Innovation

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.