“DIGITAL LIBERALIZATION”, “DIGITAL DIVIDE” AND CYBER-SKEPTICISM

Authors

  • Юрий Валентинович Асочаков St. Petersburg State University, 7–9 Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

Abstract

The article discusses social problems emerging in the course of the development of the information society. It focuses on the main interpretive models and positions in sociology and media theory concerning the directions and possibilities (perspectives) of social-political change under the conditions of the expansion of information technology. The idea and the prospects of “digital liberalization” are analyzed in terms of two radically excluding positions of “cyber-optimism”, extrapolating into “cyber-utopianism”, and “cyber-skepticism” with its “cyber-dystopian” extrapolations. Cyber-utopian beliefs and ideas are exploited and promoted in the wider and highly politicized neoliberal discourse of the «new world order», «globalization», and «the end of history». Cyber-skepticism is connected to the critique of the oppressive authoritarian response to the prospects of informational freedom. It warns that symmetrical counteractive technological measures on the part of authoritarian and oligarchical states can not only nullify the chances of digital liberalization, but also increase the risks and possibilities of upgrading traditional forms of political control and repression. The article analyses the forms and different levels of “digital divide” — digital inequality — which arise in the age of internet, seen as a new territory of human habitat and communication. Refs 11.

Keywords:

information society, information technology, social-political change, digital divide, digital inequality, digital liberalization, cyber-optimism, cyber-skepticism, cyber-utopianism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books, 2002. 404 p.

Brooks D. Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There. New York: Simon& Shuster, 2000. 284 p.

Packer G. Change the World: Silicon Valley transfers its slogans — and its money — to the realm of politics // The New Yorker, May 27, 2013.

Newsom G. Citizenville: How to Take the Town Square Digital and Reinvent Government. New York: Penguin Press, 2013. 249 p.

Johnson S. Future Perfect: The Case for Progress in a Networked Age. New York: Riverhead Books (PG), 2012. 229 p.

Clinton H. Remarks on Internet Freedom // The Newseum, Washington, DC, January 21, 2010. URL: http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2010/01/135519.htm (дата обращения: 01.02.2015).

Химанен П., Кастельс М. Информационное общество и государство благосостояния. Финская модель. М.: Логос, 2002. 219 с.

Вершинская О. Н., Алексеева О. А. Экономические и социокультурные проблемы информационного общества // Труды ИСА РАН. Т. 61 2/2011. М.: Издательская группа URSS, 2011. С. 19–25.

Piketty Т. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge (Massachusetts) and London (England): Harvard University Press, 2014. 696 p.

Иванов Д. В. К теории потоковых структур // Социологические исследования. 2012. № 4. С. 8–16.

Морозов Е. Интернет как иллюзия: Обратная сторона Сети. М.: Издательство АСТ, 2014. 528 с.

Published

2015-06-15

How to Cite

Асочаков, Ю. В. (2015). “DIGITAL LIBERALIZATION”, “DIGITAL DIVIDE” AND CYBER-SKEPTICISM. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, (2), 93–99. Retrieved from https://sociologyjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/1550