Traditional and new forms of patient expertise: Together with doctors or versus them?

Authors

  • Anastasia A. Ivanova Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, Российская Федерация, 199034, Санкт-Петербург, Университетская наб., 7–9

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2023.407

Abstract

The article outlines and discusses two opposite perspectives of medical practitioners in relation to patients’ attempts to form lay medical expertise. The author conceptualizes these two
approaches as thought styles and the corresponding communities of doctors as “thought collectives” (L.Fleck). The two thought styles are distinguished based on four characteristics: attitudes towards interaction with patients, particular ways of making sense of alternative forms
of expertise, strategies for resolving conflicts with patients, and outlooks on professional
knowledge and its place outside the medical community. One of the thought collectives —
monopolization collective — is committed to a paternalistic model of medical care, and the
corresponding style of thought does not allow noticing and acknowledging patient expertise.
Patients’ attempts at joining the professional medical rationale are resisted by these medical professionals, and in situations of disagreement or conflicts doctors use a closed strategy for their resolution. Physicians from monopolization collective are skeptical about translating
medical knowledge outside of practitioners. In contrast, doctors who adopt a co-construction
thought style follow the logic of partnership when interacting with patients. Such a style allows
medical practitioners to recognize the value in patient expertise and include it in a dialogue
and disease management. When conflicts and differences of opinions arise, doctors follow
open and intermediate strategies for their resolution, which implies additional efforts to build
communication with patients. At the same time, there is a clear demand from this collective
for the creation of high-quality popular science and educational materials for patients. High
quality translation of medical knowledge is seen as a necessary means of including patients in
productive co-production of expertise.

Keywords:

sociology of medicine, sociology of expertise, lay expertise, doctor — patient interaction, style of thought, online sources

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Бороздина Е., Здравомыслова Е., Темкина А. Забота в постсоветском пространстве между патернализмом и неолиберализмом: феминистские исследования // Критическая социология заботы: Перекрестки социального неравенства. Сер. Гендерная социология. СПб., 2019. С. 6–23.

Ковалева М.Ю., Сухоруких О.А. Клинические рекомендации. История создания и развития в Российской Федерации и за рубежом // Ремедиум: Журнал о российском рынке лекарств и медицинской технике. 2019. № 1–2. С. 6–14.

Темкина А.А. Медикализация репродукции и родов: борьба за контроль // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2014. Т. 12, № 3. С. 321–336.

Темкина А.А. Советы гинекологов о контрацепции и планировании беременности в контексте современной биополитики в России // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2013. Т. 11, № 1. С. 7–24.

Флек Л. Возникновение и развитие научного факта. М.: Идея-Пресс; Дом интеллектуальной книги, 1999.

Abbott A.D. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

Baillergeau E., Duyvendak J.W. Experiential knowledge as a resource for coping with uncertainty: Evidence and examples from the Netherlands // Health Risk & Society. 2016. Vol. 18, iss. 7–8. P. 407–426.

Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 1994.

Couët N., Desroches S., Robitaille H., Vaillancourt H., Leblanc A., Turcotte S., Elwyn G., Légaré F.Assessments of the extent to which health‐care providers involve patients in decision making: A systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument // Health Expectations. 2015. Vol. 18, iss. 4. P. 542–561.

Debronkart D. How the e-patient community helped save my life: An essay by Dave deBronkart // BMJ. 2013. P. 346–348.

Elwyn G., Scholl I., Tietbohl C., Mann M., Edwards A.G., Clay C., Légaré F., Weijden T. van der, Lewis C.L., Wexler R.M., Frosch D.L. “Many miles to go…”: A systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice // BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2013. Vol. 13, iss. 2. P. 1–10.

Eyal G. For a Sociology of Expertise: The Social Origins of the Autism Epidemic // American Journal of Sociology. 2013. Vol. 118, iss. 4. P. 863–907.

Eysenbach G. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes // CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2003. Vol. 53, iss. 6. P. 356–371.

Ferguson T. E-patients: How they can help us heal healthcare // Patient Advocacy for Health Care Quality: Strategies for Achieving Patient-Centered Care. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2007. P. 93–150.

Field M.G. The position of the Soviet physician: The bureaucratic professional // The Milbank Quarterly. 1988. Vol. 66, iss. 2. P. 182–201.

Forkner-Dunn J. Internet-based patient self-care: The next generation of health care delivery // Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2003. Vol. 5, iss. 2. P. e8–e12.

Fox S., Duggan M. Health online 2013. Pew Internet Project, 2013. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/ (дата обращения: 07.11.2022).

Francis G. Medicine: art or science? // The Lancet. 2020. Vol. 395, iss. 10217. P. 24–25.

Godolphin W. The role of risk communication in shared decision making // BMJ. 2003. Vol. 327, iss. 7417. P. 692–693.

Hardey M. ‘E-health’: The internet and the transformation of patients into consumers and producers of health knowledge // Information, Communication & Society. 2001. Vol. 4, iss. 3. P. 388–405.

Herrmann-Werner A., Weber H., Loda T., Keifenheim K.E., Erschens R., Mölbert S.C., Nikendei C., Zipfel S., Masters K. “But Dr Google said…” — Training medical students how to communicate with E-patients // Medical Teacher. 2019. Vol. 41, iss. 12. P. 1434–1440.

Litvina D., Novkunskaya A., Temkina A. Multiple vulnerabilities in medical settings: Invisible suffering of doctors // Societies. 2019. Vol. 10, iss. 1. P. 5–22.

Lupton D. Medicine as culture: Illness disease and the body in Western societies. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2003.

Masters K. Preparing medical students for the e-patient // Medical Teacher. 2017. Vol. 39, iss. 7. P. 681–685.

Masters K., Ng’ambi D., Todd, G. “I found it on the Internet”: Preparing for the e-patient in Oman // Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal. 2010. Vol. 10, iss. 2. P. 169–187.

McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: How this affects the patient — health professional relationship // Patient Education and Counseling. 2006. Vol.63, iss. 1–2. P.24–28.

Prior L. Belief, knowledge and expertise: The emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology // Sociology of Health & Illness. 2003. Vol. 25, iss. 3. P. 41–57.

Rice R. E., Katz J. E. Internet use in physician practice and patient interaction // Murero M., Rice R. E.(eds). The Internet and health care: Theory, research and practice. New York: Routledge, 2006. P. 149–176.

Rose N. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.

Saunders J. The practice of clinical medicine as an art and as a science // Medical Humanities. 2000. Vol. 26, iss. 1. P. 18–22.

References

Borozdina E., Zdravomyslova E., Tyomkina A. Care in Postsoviet space between paternalism and neoliberalism: Feminist studies. In: Kriticheskaia sotsiologiia zaboty: Perekrestki sotsialnogo neravenstva. St. Petersburg, 2019, pp. 6–23. (In Russian)

Kovalyova M.Yu., Sukhorukikh O.A. Clinical guidelines. The history of creation and development in Russian Federation and abroad. Remedium. Zhurnal o rossiiskom rynke lekarstv i meditsinskoi tekhnike, 2019, no. 1–2, pp. 6–14. (In Russian)

Tyomkina A.A. Medicalization of reproduction and birth: Fight for control. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsialnoi poitiki, 2014, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 321–336. (In Russian)

Tyomkina A.A. Advice of gynecologists concerning contraception and birth planning in the context of current biopolitics in Russia. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsialnoi poitiki, 2013, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 7–24. (In Russian)

Fleck L. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Moscow, Ideya-Press Publ.; Dom Intellektualnoi Knigi Publ., 1999. (In Russian)

Abbott A.D. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1988.

Baillergeau E., Duyvendak J.W. Experiential knowledge as a resource for coping with uncertainty: Evidence and examples from the Netherlands. Health Risk & Society, 2016, vol. 18, iss. 7–8, pp. 407–426.

Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Redwood City, Stanford University Press, 1994.

Couët N., Desroches S., Robitaille H., Vaillancourt H., Leblanc A., Turcotte S., Elwyn G., Légaré F. Assessments of the extent to which health‐care providers involve patients in decision making: A systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expectations, 2015, vol. 18, iss. 4, pp. 542–561.

Debronkart D. How the e-patient community helped save my life: An essay by Dave deBronkart. BMJ, 2013, pp. 346–348.

Elwyn G., Scholl I., Tietbohl C., Mann M., Edwards A.G., Clay C., Légaré F., Weijden T. van der, Lewis C.L., Wexler R.M., Frosch D.L. “Many miles to go…”: A systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 1–10.

Eyal G. For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic. American Journal of Sociology, 2013, vol. 118, iss. 4, pp. 863–907.

Eysenbach G. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2003, vol. 53, iss. 6, pp. 356–371.

Ferguson T. E-patients: How they can help us heal healthcare. In: Patient Advocacy for Health Care Quality: Strategies for Achieving Patient-Centered Care. Burlington, Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2007, pp. 93–150.

Field M.G. The position of the Soviet physician: The bureaucratic professional. The Milbank Quarterly, 1988, vol. 66, iss. 2, pp. 182–201.

Forkner-Dunn J. Internet-based patient self-care: The next generation of health care delivery. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2003, vol. 5, iss. 2, pp. e8–e12.

Fox S., Duggan M. Health online 2013. Pew Internet Project, 2013. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/ (accessed: 07.11.2022).

Francis G. Medicine: Art or science? The Lancet, 2020, vol. 395, iss. 10217, pp. 24–25.

Godolphin W. The role of risk communication in shared decision making. BMJ, 2003, vol. 327, iss. 7417, pp. 692–693.

Hardey M. ‘E-health’: The internet and the transformation of patients into consumers and producers of health knowledge. Information, Communication & Society, 2001, vol. 4, iss. 3, pp. 388–405.

Herrmann-Werner A., Weber H., Loda T., Keifenheim K.E., Erschens R., Mölbert S.C., Nikendei C., Zipfel S., Masters K. “But Dr Google said…” — Training medical students how to communicate with E-patients. Medical Teacher, 2019, vol. 41, iss. 12, pp. 1434–1440.

Litvina D., Novkunskaya A., Temkina A. Multiple vulnerabilities in medical settings: Invisible suffering of doctors. Societies, 2019, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 5–22.

Lupton D. Medicine as Culture: Illness disease and the body in Western societies. 2nd ed. London, Sage, 2003.

Masters K. Preparing medical students for the e-patient. Medical Teacher, 2017, vol. 39, iss. 7, pp. 681–685.

Masters K., Ng’ambi D., Todd G. “I Found it on the Internet”: Preparing for the e-patient in Oman. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 2010, vol. 10, iss. 2, pp. 169–187.

McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: How this affects the patient — health professional relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 2006, vol. 63, iss. 1–2, pp. 24–28.

Prior L. Belief, knowledge and expertise: The emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology. Sociology of Health & Illness, 2003, vol. 25, iss. 3, pp. 41–57.

Rice R. E., Katz J. E. Internet use in physician practice and patient interaction. In: Murero M., Rice R. E.(eds). The Internet and Health Care: Theory, research and practice. New York. Routledge, 2006, pp. 149–176.

Rose N. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2007.

Saunders J. The practice of clinical medicine as an art and as a science. Medical Humanities, 2000, vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 18–22.

Published

2024-06-05

How to Cite

Ivanova, A. A. (2024). Traditional and new forms of patient expertise: Together with doctors or versus them?. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 16(4), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2023.407