The use of digital public services as a factor of social well-being*

Authors

  • Lyudmila А. Vidiasova ITMO University, 49, Kronverksky pr., St. Petersburg, 197101, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2024.106

Abstract

In recent years, the trend of digitalization of society has led researchers to think about the possible relationship of factors connecting the penetration of information technologies and such social aspects as the quality of life of the population, residents’ satisfaction with the urban environment, and social well-being. The article presents the results of a representative
sociological study of the needs for digital services among residents of St. Petersburg, as well as the relationship between satisfaction from using services and the level of social well-being. In St. Petersburg, the priority project “Ecosystem of City Services ‘Digital Petersburg’” is being implemented, which is a model for providing digital services by locating city services in one place. Satisfaction with the lives of citizens is the ultimate goal of the project, and this category is closely related to the subjective judgments of residents who come into contact with everyday practices through an emotional background. The study was conducted using an online survey of 500 city residents, a sample representative of the gender and age of respondents. According to the results of the study, a relationship was identified between the use of digital services and indicators of the social well-being of the population. Among city residents, those who highly value the convenience of digital services demonstrate greater life satisfaction. According to the survey, the social well-being of citizens is influenced by confidence in their own IT skills, a high assessment of the convenience of digital services, trust in interaction with authorities online, and an assessment of the effectiveness of services. The author sees the development of a methodology for multifactorial assessment of social well-being, including the use of data from social media and other open sources, as future research tasks.

Keywords:

digital services, public electronic services, social well-being, survey, IT skills, urban services ecosystem

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Абдрахманова Г.И., Васильковский С.А., Вишневский К.О., Гохберг Л.М., Демидкина О.В., Демьянова А.В., Зинина Т.С., Зорина О.А., Ковалева Г.Г., Коцемир М.Н., Кузина Л.С., Кузнецова И.А., Лола И.С., Мартынов Д.М., Нечаева Е.Г., Озерова О.К., Остапкович Г.В., Покровский С.И., Попов Е.В., Ратай Т.В., Репина А.А., Рудник П.Б., Рыжикова З.А., Стрельцова Е.А., Утятина К.Е., Фридлянова С.Ю., Фролов М.С., Шкалева Е.В., Шугаль Н.Б. Индикаторы цифровой экономики: 2022: статистический сборник. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2023. 332 с.

Равчик М.И. Экосистема городских сервисов: исследование приоритетных потребностей в электронных услугах старшего поколения // Успехи геронтологии. 2022. Т. 35, № 4. С. 627.

Суняйкина О.Н. Понятие «социальное самочувствие» в социологии // Вестник Мордовского университета. 2011. № 3. С. 98–101.

Социальное самочувствие россиян: мониторинг // ВЦИОМ. 2023. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/socialnoe-samochuvstvie-monitoring (дата обращения: 08.04.2024).

Campbell A. The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends. New York: McGrawHill, 1981.

Andrews F.M., Abbey A., Halman L.J. Stress from infertility, marriage factors, and subjective wellbeing of wives and husbands // Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1991. Vol. 32, no. 3. P. 238–253.

Zhang Z., Zhang J., Zhao N., Yang Ya. Social network size and subjective well-being: The mediating role of future time perspective among community-dwelling retirees // Frontiers in Psychology. 2019. Vol. 10, P. 2590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02590

Бочканова Е.Н. Социальное самочувствие горожан — ориентир муниципальной социальной политики // Известия Уральского государственного университета. Сер. 3: Общественные науки. 2007. № 5. С. 29–37.

Тихонова Е.В. Социальное настроение как индикатор восприятия населением социальной действительности // Материалы Афанасьевских чтений. 2016. Т. 16, № 3. С. 12–16.

Тощенко Ж.Т. Социальное настроение — феномен современной социологической теории и практики // Социс. 1998. № 1. С. 21–35.

Зерчанинова Т.Е., Самков К.Н., Тургель И.Д. Социальная эффективность деятельности местной администрации: опыт социологического исследования моногородов. Екатеринбург: Урал. акад. госслужбы, 2010.

Bannister F., Connolly R. ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research // Government Information Quarterly. 2014. Vol. 31. P. 119–128.

Moore M.H. Creating Public Value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.

Инглхарт Р., Вельцель К. Модернизация, культурные изменения и демократия: Последовательность человеческого развития. М.: Новое издательство, 2011.

Cinelli M., Morales G.D. F., Galeazzi A., Quattrociocchi W., Starnini M. The echo chamber effect on social media // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2021. Vol. 118, no. 9. P. e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

Андреенкова А.В. Цифровизация социальных контактов среди студенческой молодежи в России во время пандемии коронавируса // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 6. С. 403–426. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1749

Schemer C., Masur P.K., Geiß S., Müller P., Schäfer S. The impact of Internet and social media use on well-Being: A longitudinal analysis of adolescents across nine years // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2021. Vol. 26, no. 1. P. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa014

Kearns A., Whitley E. Associations of internet access with social integration, wellbeing and physical activity among adults in deprived communities: Evidence from a household survey // BMC Public Health. 2019. Vol. 19. P. 860. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7199-x

Wu B., Liu T., Tian B. How does social media use impact subjective well-being? Examining the suppressing role of Internet addiction // Frontiers in Psychology. Sec.: Positive Psychology. 2023. Vol. 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1108692

Vidiasov E., Vidiasova L., Tensina I. Institutional factors for building trust in information technology: Case-study of Saint Petersburg // Communications in Computer and Information Science. 2022. Vol. 1503. P. 152–162.

Фантаццини Д., Шаклеина М.В., Юрас И.А. Big Data в определении социального самочувствия населения России // Прикладная эконометрика. 2018. Т. 50, № 2. С. 43–66.

References

Abdrakhmanova G.I., Vasilkovsky S.A., Vishnevsky K.O., Gokhberg L.M., Demidkina O.V., Demyanova A.V., Zinina T. S., Zorina O.A., Kovaleva G. O.G., Kotsemir M.N., Kuzina L. S., Kuznetsova I.A., Lola I. S., Martynov D.M., Nechaeva E.G., Ozerova O.K., Ostapkovich G.V. ., Pokrovsky S.I., Popov E.V., Ratay T.V., Repina A.A., Rudnik P.B., Ryzhikova Z.A., Streltsova E.A., Utyatina K.E., Fridlyanova S.Yu., FrolovM. S., Shkaleva E.V., Shugal N.B. Indicators of the Digital Economy: 2022: statistical digest. Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2023. 332 с. (In Russian)

Ravchik M.I. Ecosystem of urban services: A study of priority needs for electronic services of the older generation. Uspekhi gerontologii, 2022, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 627. (In Russian)

Sunyakina O.N. The concept of “social well-being” in sociology. Vestnik Mordovskogo universiteta, 2011, no. 3, pp. 98–101. (In Russian)

Social well-being of Russians: monitoring. VTsIOM, 2023. Available at: https://wciom.ru/analyticalreviews/analiticheskii-obzor/socialnoe-samochuvstvie-monitoring. (In Russian)

Campbell A. The Sense of Well-­Being in America: Recent patterns and trends. New York, McGrawHill, 1981.

Andrews F.M., Abbey A., Halman L.J. Stress from infertility, marriage factors, and subjective wellbeing of wives and husbands. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1991, vol. 32, no. 3, p. 238–253.

Zhang Z., Zhang J., Zhao N., Yang Ya. Social network size and subjective well-being: The mediating role of future time perspective among community-dwelling retirees. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, vol. 10, p. 2590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02590

Bochkanova E.N. Social well-being of townspeople— a reference point for municipal social policy. Izvestiia Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 3: Obshchestvennye nauki, 2007, no. 5, pp. 29–37. (In Russian)

Tikhonova E.V. Social mood as an indicator of the population’s perception of social reality. Materialy Afanas’evskikh chtenii, 2016, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 12–16. (In Russian)

Toshchenko Zh.T. Social mood — a phenomenon of modern sociological theory and practice. Sotsis, 1998, no. 1, pp. 21–35. (In Russian)

Zerchaninova T.E., Samkov K.N., Turgel I.D. Social efficiency of local administration: experience of sociological research of single-­industry towns. Yekaterinburg, Ural’skaia akademiia gosudarstvennoi skyzhby Publ., 2010. (In Russian)

Bannister F., Connolly R. ICT, public values and transformative government: a framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 2014, vol. 31, pp. 119–128.

Moore M.H. Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1995.

Inglehart R., Welzel K. Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The sequence of human development. Moscow, Novoe izdatel’stvo Publ., 2011. (In Russian)

Cinelli M., Morales G.D. F., Galeazzi A., Quattrociocchi W., Starnini M. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, vol. 118, no. 9, p. e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

Andreenkova A.V. Digitalization of social contacts among university students in Russia during COVID-19. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny, 2020, no. 6, pp. 403–426. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1749 (In Russian)

Schemer C., Masur P.K., Geiß S., Müller P., Schäfer S. The impact of Internet and social media use on well-being: A longitudinal analysis of adolescents across nine years. Journal of Computer-­Mediated Communication, 2021, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa014

Kearns A., Whitley E. Associations of Internet access with social integration, wellbeing and physical activity among adults in deprived communities: evidence from a household survey. BMC Public Health, 2019, vol. 19, p. 860. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7199-x

Wu B., Liu T., Tian B. How does social media use impact subjective well-being? Examining the suppressing role of Internet addiction. Frontiers in Psychology. Sec.: Positive Psychology, 2023, vol. 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1108692

Vidiasov E., Vidiasova L., Tensina I. Institutional factors for building trust in information technology: Case-study of Saint Petersburg. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2022, vol. 1503, pp. 152–162.

Fantazzini D., Shakleina M.V., Yuras I.A. Big Data in determining the social well-being of the population of Russia. Prikladnaia ekonometrika, 2018, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 43–66. (In Russian)

Published

2024-08-10

How to Cite

Vidiasova L. А. (2024). The use of digital public services as a factor of social well-being*. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 17(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2024.106