The image of the Soviet man in Russian films: a sociological analysis

Authors

  • Anna A. Dupak St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2379-6809

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.406

Abstract

Films are viewed as an instrument of historical policy and a means of interpreting and distributing certain views about various episodes in national history. The study sample consisted of the eight highest box-office non-military Russian films about Soviet society, which were released between 2008 and 2017. Based on the method of organizing the plot and the themes raised, the films were divided into two groups: “films about achievements” and “films about personal life.” The key methods were the following: 1. content analysis of screen time allocated to certain scenes and characters, to discussions of various topics; 2. discourse analysis of the speech of film characters. On the basis of analysis, three types of characters were described: “hero” (main positive character), “opponent” (main antagonist) and “helper.” The results of the analysis depict the main tendencies in the interpretations of the events of the Soviet era by contemporary Russian cinema. One of the key themes in all the films is the confrontation between a person and the state, manifested through the conflict of a “hero” and an “opponent” (a representative of the government department). Characters who uphold personal values, act independently and are not afraid to take risks, are marked positively. Moreover, behaviour of those characters is not always consistent with the interests of the state. At the same time, characters who support the values accepted in Soviet society and act strictly in accordance with the orders of the authorities are marked negatively. The films contrast the positive ideas about the Soviet people, the negative ideas about the state system. In this manner, the problem of the ambivalence of modern interpretations of Soviet history is being solved.

Keywords:

Contemporary Russia cinema, image of Soviet man, historical policy, content analysis, discourse analysis, narrative, sociology of film

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Мазур Л. Н. Образ прошлого: формирование исторической памяти // Известия Уральского федерального университета. Сер. 2. Гуманитарные науки. 2013. № 3. С. 243–256.

Малинова О. Ю. Актуальное прошлое: символическая политика властвующей элиты и дилеммы российской идентичности. М.: Политическая энциклопедия, 2015. 207 с.

Milkie M. A. Social world approach to cultural studies: Mass Media and Gender in the Adolescent Peer Group // Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 1994. Vol. 23 (3). P. 354–380. doi:10.1177/089124194023003005.

Жабский М. И. Полюса кинопроцесса: притяжение и отталкивание. М.: Научно-исследовательский институт киноискусства, 2007. 308 с.

Van Zoonen L. Audience reactions to Hollywood politics // Media, Culture and Society. 2007. Vol. 29 (4). P. 531–542. doi: 10.1177/0163443707076188.

Грей Г. Кино. Визуальная антропология. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2014. 203 с.

Вейц М. Стратегии реконструирования советской повседневности и телесности в современном российском кинематографе // Визуальная антропология: настройка оптики / под ред. Е. В. Ярской-Смирновой и П. Романова. М.: ООО «Вариант»; ЦСПГИ, 2009. С. 281–283.

Ямпольский М. Б. Исчезновение как форма существования // Киноведческие записки. 1999. Т. 44 (дек.). С. 21–27.

Аронсон О. По ту сторону кино. «Хрусталев, машину!» Алексея Германа и проблемы «советского» // Метакино. М.: АдМаргинем, 2003. С. 218–227.

Якобидзе-Гитман А. Восстание фантазмов: сталинская эпоха в постсоветском кино. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2015. 312 с.

Исаев Е. М., Пожидаева И. В. Популярная история в современной России: мифы, образы и представления о прошлом в спортивном историческом фильме // Гуманитарный вектор. Сер. «История, политология». 2016. Т. 11, № 4. С. 128–136.

Larsen S. Melodramatic Masculinity, National Identity, and the Stalinist Past in Postsoviet Cinema // Studies in 20th Century Literature: Russian Culture of the 1990s. 2000. Р. 85–120. doi: 10.4148/2334-4415.1476.

Хохлов В. А. Великая Отечественная война в современном российском кино: продолжение в фэнтези-будущем // Новый исторический вестник. 2010. № 23. URL: http://www.nivestnik.ru/2010_1/3.shtml (дата обращения: 04.05.2018).

Чистякова В. О. Отечественное военное кино 1911–2011-х годов: медиатизация памяти // Культурологический журнал. 2013. № 3 (9). С. 1–14.

Евгеньева Т. В. Историческая память и национально-государственная идентичность в современной России // Ценности и смыслы. 2012. № 5 (21). С. 27–36.

Волков Е. В. Война на экране: киноэпопеи Ю. Н. Озерова в контексте коллективной памяти советского общества 1960–1980-х годов // Наука ЮУрГУ. Секции социально-гуманитарных наук: материалы 67-й научной конференции. URL: http://dspace.susu.ac.ru/xmlui/handle/0001.74/5565 (дата обращения: 17.12.2017).

Гроных А. А. Медиа и общество. Вильнюс: ЕГУ, 2013. 404 с.

Островская Е. А. Дискурс-анализ «Левиафана»: православная идеология в артхаусном кино // Мониторинг. 2017. № 2 (138). С. 211–232.

Йоргенсен М. В., Филипс Л. Дж. Дискурс-анализ. Теория и метод. Харьков: Гуманитарный центр, 2008. 352 с.

Пропп В. Я. Морфология сказки. М.: Наука, 1969. 168 с.

Миллер А. И. Россия: власть и история // Pro et contra. 2009. № 3–4 (46).

Титов В. В. Политика памяти и формирование национально-государственной идентичности в России: роль институтов культуры и массмедиа // Известия Тульск. гос. ун-та. Гуманитарные науки. 2016. № 3. С. 45–57.


References

Mazur L. N. The Image of the Past: Historical Memory Formation. Izvestiia Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, pp. 243–256. (In Russian)

Malinova O. Y. Actual Past: the Symbolic Politics of the Elite and the Dilemma of Russian Identity. Moscow, Political Encyclopedia Publ., 2015. 207 p. (In Russian)

Milkie M. A. Social world approach to cultural studies: Mass media and gender in the adolescent peer group. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1994, no. 23 (3), pp. 354–380. doi:10.1177/089124194023003005.

Zabskii M. I. Сinema poles: attraction and repulsion. Moskow, Institut kinoiskusstva, 2007. 308 p.(In Russian)

Van Zoonen L. Audience reactions to Hollywood politics. Media, Culture & Society, 2007, no. 29 (4), pp. 531–547. doi: 10.1177/0163443707076188.

Grey G. Cinema: Visual Antropology. Moskow, Novoye Publ., 2014. 203 p. (In Russian)

Veiz M. Strategies of reconstruction of Soviet physicality and everyday life in contemporary Russian cinema. Vizual'naia antropologiia: Nastroika optiki. Moskow, Variant Publ., 2009, pp. 281–283. (In Russian)

Yampolskiy M. B. Disappearance as a form of existence. Kinovedcheskie zapiski, 1999, vol. 44, pp. 21–27. (In Russian)

Aronson O. On the other side of the cinema. “Khrustalev, mashinu!” of Aleksey German and problems of “Soviet”. Metakino. Moskow, Ad Marginem Publ., 2003. (In Russian)

Yakobidze-Gitman A. The uprising of fantasies: Stalin era in the post-Soviet cinema. Moscow, Novoye Publ., 2015. 312 p. (In Russian)

Isaev E. M., Pozhidaeva I. V. Popular History in Modern Russia: Myths, Images and Ideas of the Past in Sport Historical Film. Gumanitarnii vektor, 2016, vol. 11, no. 44, pp. 128–136. (In Russian)

Larsen S. Melodramatic Masculinity, National Identity, and the Stalinist Past in Postsoviet Cinema. Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature, 2000, no. 24 (1), pp. 85–120. doi: 10.4148/2334-4415.1476.

Khokhlov V. A. Great Patriotic War in Contemporary Russian Cinema: Continuation in the Fantasy-Future. Novii istoricheskii vestnik, 2010, no. 23. URL: http://www.nivestnik.ru/2010_1/3.shtml (accessed: 04.05.2018). (In Russian)

Chistiakova V. O. National military cinema 1911–2011: mediation of memory. Kultorologicheskii zhurnal, 2013, no. 3 (9), pp. 1–14. (In Russian)

Evgenieva T. V. Historical memory and national identity in modern Russia. Zennosti i smysly, 2012, no. 5 (21), pp. 27–36. (In Russian)

Volkov E. V. War on the screen: Film epics of Ozerov in the context of collective memory of Soviet society of 1960s–1980s. Nauka YUrGY. Sectsii Sozialno-gumanitarnykh nauk. URL: http://dspace.susu.ac.ru/xmlui/handle/0001.74/5565 (accessed: 17.12.2017). (In Russian)

Gronych A. A. Media and Society. Vilnus, EGU Publ., 2013. 404 p. (In Russian)

Ostrovskaya E. A. Discourse analysis of “Leviafan”: Ortodox ideology in the arthause cinema. Monitoring, 2017, no. 2 (138), pp. 211–232. (In Russian)

Jørgensen M. W., Phillips L. J. Discourse analysis as theory and method. Kharkiv, Humanitarian center, 2008. 352 p.

Propp V. I. Morphology of the Folktale. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1969. 168 p. (In Russian)

Miller А. I. Russia: the power and historyю. Pro et Contra, 2009, no. 2, pp. 51–52. (In Russian)

Titov V. V. Policy of memory and the formation of national-state identity in Russia: the role of cultural institutes and mass media. Izvestia Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2016, no. 3, pp. 45–57. (In Russian)

Published

2019-12-04

How to Cite

Dupak, A. A. . (2019). The image of the Soviet man in Russian films: a sociological analysis . Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 12(4), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.406