Лики Януса в антикоррупционной риторике в Греции
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2021.304Аннотация
На основе официальных отчетов и публикаций в прессе рассматривается, как риторика коррупции используется в греческой политике. Описываются функции, которые она выполняет. В первой части статьи приводится обзор международных исследований и контекстуального фона коррупции. Автор отмечает отсутствие в литературе исторических примеров по борьбе с коррупцией и анализирует факторы, которые исследователи соотносят с коррупцией, такие как степень демократии (де)централизация политической системы, скандализация в СМИ и т. д. Во второй части кратко
представлен подход греческих аналитиков к данной теме. Рассматриваются вопросы, касающиеся старых и новых форм клиентизма, которые вызывают наибольший интерес у греческих ученых. В третьей части описывается проведенный автором дискурс-анализ и его результаты. Показано, что коррупционная риторика политиков работает в первую очередь как стратегия, способная подорвать моральный дух главного политического оппонента (оппонентов), а иногда и как метод обеспечения электорального превосходства. По результатам анализа автор делает вывод о бесполезности попыток
греческих правительств улучшить положение страны в антикоррупционном мире путем принятия законов, создания новых органов и учреждений по борьбе с коррупцией, игнорируя тот факт, что основные усилия должны быть направлены на улучшение имиджа Греции на международном рынке. Позитивное изменение имиджа страны на международной арене произошло в последние несколько лет благодаря главным образом неолиберальной экономической политике под опекой иностранных кредиторов.
Ключевые слова:
политический антагонизм, антикоррупционная риторика, предвыборная борьба, неолиберальная политика
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Библиографические ссылки
References
Galtung F. The political economy of corruption control. In Andvig, J. C., Fjeldstad, O.-H. and Shrivastava, A. (eds.), Corruption. Critical assessments of contemporary research. Report from a multidisciplinary workshop, WP 2001: 17, Bergen, Chr. Michelsen Institute, 2001, available at: https://www.cmi.no/publications/file/860-corruption-critical-assessments-of-contemporary.pdf (accessed: 25.08.2021).
Ashour A. S., AboRemila H. S. A conceptual analysis of macro corruption: Dimensions and forward and backward linkages. Journal of Public Administration and Governance. 2019. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 277–299. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v9i2.14983.
Paldam M. The cross-country pattern of corruption: economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics. European Journal of Political Economy. 2002. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00078-2.
Harriss-White B. and White G. (eds.) Liberalization and the new corruption? IDS Bulletin. 1996. Vol. 27, no. 2, Brighton, Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex, available at: https://bulletin.ids.ac.uk/index.php/idsbo/issue/archive. (accessed: 25.08.2021).
Treisman D. The causes of corruption: Α cross national study. Journal of Public Economics. 2000. Vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 399–457.
Goldsmith A. A. Slapping the grasping hand: Correlates of political corruption in emerging markets. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 1999. Vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 865–883, available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3488011 (accessed: 25.08.2021).
Amundsen I. Political corruption: An introduction to the issues, Development Studies and Human Rights, WP 7, Bergen, Chr. Michelsen Institute, 1999.
Manor J. The political economy of democratic decentralization. Report No: 19080, Series: Directions in development, Washington D. C., World Bank, 1999, available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/386101468739238037/pdf/multi-page.pdf (accessed: 25.08.2021).
Kotera G., Okada K., Samreth S. Government size, democracy, and corruption: An empirical investigation. Economic Modelling. 2012. Vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2340–2348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.06.022.
Höffling C. Korruption und soziale Beziehung. Opladen, Leske+Budrich, 2002.
Bannenberg B. Korruption in Deutschland und ihre strafrechtliche Kontrolle: Kriminologische Aspekte der Strafverfolgung. Kriminalistik. 2005. Bd. 59, no. 8–9, pp. 468–477.
Moroff H. Internationalisierung von Antikorruptionsregimen. In von Alemann U. (ed.), Dimensionen politischer Korruption. Beiträge zum Stand der internationalen Forschung. Wiesbaden, VS Verlag, 2005. P. 444–477.
Neumann U. Criminal law without borders. Poinikos Logos. 2006. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 731–740.
Clark W. A. Crime and punishment in Soviet officialdom. Combating corruption in the political elite, 1965–1990. Armonk/NY et al., Sharpe, 1993.
Karstedt S. Macht, Ungleichheit und Korruption: Strukturelle und kulturelle Determinanten im internationalen Vergleich. KZfSS, Sonderheft 43: Soziologie der Kriminalität, Oberwittler D. and Karstedt S.(eds.), Wiesbaden, VS Verlag, 2004. P. 384–412.
Dong B., Dulleck U., Torgler B. Conditional corruption. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2012. Vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 609–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.12.001.
Mouzelis N. P. Politics in the semi-periphery: Early parliamentarism and late industrialization in the Balkans and Latin America. Athens, Themelio, 1987.
Tsoukalas K. State, society, labour in post-war Greece. Athens, Themelio, 1987.
Mavrogordatos G. Between Pityokamptes and Prokroustes: Corporate interests in contemporary Greece. Athens, Odysseas, 1988.
Public Issue (January 2008, February 2009, March 2010), National research about corruption in Greece, 2007, 2008, 2009 (no more available online).
European Commission, Eurobarometer, Special Eurobarometer 470, 502: Corruption, December 2017, 2019, available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/about/eurobarometer (accessed: 25.08.2021).
van Dijk J. J. M., Manchin R., van Kesteren J. N., Hideg G. The burden of crime in the EU: A comparative analysis of the European Survey of Crime and Safety Gallup Europe. 2019, available at: https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/815250/burdenofcrimefinal.pdf (accessed: 25.08.2021).
Bratsis P. Corrupt compared to what? Greece, capitalist interests, and the specular purity of the state. Discussion Paper. No. 8, The Hellenic Observatory, London School of Economics. 2003, available at: https://www.lse.ac.uk/Hellenic-Observatory/Assets/Documents/Publications/Past-Discussion-Papers/DiscussPaper8.pdf (accessed: 25.08.2021).
Koutsoukis K., Sklias P. (eds.) Corruption and scandals in public administration and politics. Athens, I. Sideris, 2005.
Koutsoukis K. Pathology of politics. Patterns of corruption in the modern Greek state. Athens, Papazissis, 1998.
Stokes S. C. Political clientelism. In Boix C. and Stokes S. C. (eds.), Handbook of comparative politics. New York, Oxford University Press, 2007. P. 604–627.
Hopkin J. Conceptualizing political clientelism: Political exchange and democratic theory, APSA Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, USA, 8/31–9/3. 2006, available at: https://personal.lse.ac.uk/hopkin/apsahopkin2006.pdf (accessed: 25.08.2021).
Sotiropoulos D. A. Bureaucracy and political power: Sociological analysis of the relations between public administration and politics in Greece during the ’80s. Athens and Komotini. A. N. Sakkoulas, 1996.
Lyrintzis C. The changing party system: Stable democracy, contested ‘modernization’. West European Politics. 2005. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380500058845.
Lyrintzis C. Political parties in post-junta Greece: A case of bureaucratic clientelism? West European Politics. 1984. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402388408424473.
Sotiropoulos D. A. State and reform in modern Southern Europe: Greece-Spain-Italy-Portugal. Athens, Potamos, 2007.
University of Konstanz. Crime and culture, crime as a cultural problem. The relevance of perceptions of corruption to crime prevention. A comparative cultural study in the EU-Accession States Bulgaria and Romania, the EU-Candidate States Turkey and Croatia and the EU-States Germany, Greece and United Kingdom. An International Research Project within the 6th Framework Program of the European Commission. 2006–2009, available at: https://www.uni-konstanz.de/crimeandculture/index.htm. (accessed: 11.07.2021).
Tänzler D., Giannakopoulos A., Maras K. Research findings on construction of corruption in seven European countries within the EU-Project Crime and Culture. In Coester M. and Marks E. (eds.) (2008). International Perspectives of Crime Prevention: Contributions from the 1st Annual International Forum. Möenchengladbach, Forum Verlag Godesberg GmbH, 2008. P. 99–124.
Research Group Sociology of Knowledge-University of Konstanz (October 2006). Perceptions of corruption in Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Croatia, Greece, Germany and the United Kingdom. A content analysis of documents from politics, judiciary, police, media, civil society and economy. State of the Art Report, Deliverable No 1, Konstanz, pp. 7–8, available at: http://www.uni-konstanz.de/crimeandculture/reports.htm (accessed: 25.08.2021).
Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago/IL, Aldine, 1967/2007.
Noble H., Mitchell G. What is grounded theory? Evidence-Based Nursing. 2016. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2016-102306.
Merton R. Social theory and social structure: enlarged ed. New York, Free Press, 1968.
Malinowski B. Anthropology. Encyclopedia Britannica, Fist Supplementary Volume, London, New York, 1926. P. 132–133.
Luhmann N. Soziologische Aufklärung: 1, 7th edn., Wiesbaden, VS Verlag, 1970/2005.
Knudsen M. Surprised by Method — Functional Method and Systems Theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung (Forum: Qualitative Social Research). 2010. Vol. 11, no. 3, Art. 12, pp. 18, available at: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1556.
Lambropoulou E. Corruption discourse as a wild card: Politics and media in Greece and the “modern” triumphalism of anti-corruption. In Tänzler D., Maras K. and Giannakopoulos A. (eds.). Social construction of corruption in Europe. Surrey/England, Ashgate, 2012. P. 265–296.
Lambropoulou E. Perceptions of corruption in Greece. A comparison of findings of the first (documents analysis) and second (interviews analysis) project phase in Greece. In Tänzler D., Giannakopoulos A., Maras K. A comparison of findings of the first and second project phase in Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Croatia, Germany, Greece and the United Kingdom, Deliverable No 3, Final Scientific Report 3, 2008, pp. 139–199, available at: http://www.uni-konstanz.de/crimeandculture/docs/STREP_Crime_and_Culture_Deliverable_3_Oktober_2008.pdf (accessed: 25.08.2021).
Lambropoulou E. Greece: State of the Art Report. Perceptions of corruption in Greece. A content analysis of documents from politics, judiciary, police, media, civil society and economy, Specific Targeted Research Project: Crime and Culture, 2006, available at: https://www.uni-konstanz.de/crimeandculture/reports.htm (accessed: 25.08.2021).
Fanaras S. Values, democracy and trust. Athens, diaNEOSIS, 2018, available at: https://www.dianeosis.org/research/world-values-survey/ (accessed: 03.07.2021).
European Social Survey (ed.), Data and Documentation-Online Analysis. Findings available at: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/findings/ (accessed: 11.07.2021).
National Centre for Social Research/EKKE. European Social Survey, Findings of the 4th Wave of the field research, Greece-Europe. A provisional analysis, Athens, EKKE, 2009.
Koniordos S. Presentation report of the Greek results from the Wave 7 (World Values Survey-7). Athens, diaNEOSIS, 2018.
Economic Intelligence Unit. Democracy Index 2019, A year of democratic setbacks and popular protest. London, New York, Hong Kong, EIU, 2020.
Economic Intelligence Unit. Democracy Index 2018: Me too? Political participation, protest and democracy. London, New York, Hong Kong, EIU, 2019.
Kekic L. The Economist Intelligence Unit’s index of democracy 2006. 2007, available at: https://www.economist.com/media/pdf/DEMOCRACY_TABLE_2007_v3.pdf (accessed: 02.07.2021).
Transparency International/TI. Corruption Perception Index 1996–1998, 2003–2020, available at: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi (accessed: 01.07.2021).
European Values Study/EVS. European Values Study 1999 — Greece, GESIS Data Archive, ZA3801, Data file Version 3.0.1. 2012. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11536
EVS (ed.) European Values Study 2008 — Greece, GESIS Data Archive, ZA4776, Data file Version 2.0.0. 2010, available at: https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/GDESC2.asp?no=0009&DB=E (accessed: 11.07.2021).
National Statistical Service of Greece-ELSTAT. Justice Statistics 1980–1996. National Printing Office, Athens. Justice Statistics 1998–2019 online, available at: https://www.statistics.gr/en/statistics/-/publication/SJU03/1998; https://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SJU03/2019. (accessed: 02.07.2021).
General Inspector of Public Administration/GIPA. Annual Report 2016. Athens, 2017.
GIPA. Annual Report 2017. Athens, 2018.
GIPA. Annual Report 2011. Athens, 2012.
GIPA. Annual Report 2012. Athens, 2013.
Inspectors-Controllers’ Body for Public Administration/SEEDD. Annual Report 2015. Athens, 2016.
Inspectors-Controllers’ Body for Public Administration. Annual Report 2016. Athens, 2017.
Ministry of Justice. ‘Transparency’: National Action Plan against Corruption. Athens, MoJ, 2013.
European Commission, Task Force for Greece (ed.), Second Quarterly Report (March 2012), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/archives/commission_2010-2014/president/news/speeches-statements/pdf/qr_march2012_en.pdf (accessed: 02.07.2021).
General Secretariat against Corruption. Annual Report (March 2015 — June 2016). Athens.
OECD (April 2018). Baseline Report on Greece’s National Anti-Corruption Action Plan: Revision and M&E Processes, Greece-OECD Project: Technical Support on Anti-Corruption. Paris, OECD, available at: https://www.oecd.org/governance/ethics/baseline-report-greece-national-anti-corruption-action-planen.pdf (accessed: 01.07.2021).
Pelagidis Th. Policies against corruption. In Massourakis M. and Ghortsos Ch. (eds.), Competitiveness and development. Athens, Hellenic Bank Union/EET, 2014. P. 575–588.
Bertelsmann Stiftung (ed.) Policy performance and governance capacities in the OECD and EU, Sustainable Governance Indicators 2014. Gütersloh, BS, 2014, available at: https://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/en/publications/publication/did/policy-performance-and-governance-capacities-in-theoecd-and-eu?tx_rsmbstpublications_pi2%5BfilterPreis%5D=0&tx_rsmbstpublications_pi2%5BfilterSprache%5D%5B2%5D=1&tx_rsmbstpublications_pi2%5BfilterSubmit%5D=1&tx_rsmbstpublications_pi2%5Bpage%5D=0&tx_rsmbstpublications_pi2%5Bsword%5D=Policy%20Performance%20and%20Governance%20Capacities%20in%20the%20OECD%20and%20EU&cHash=cc46d1619830078e0d2f4268ce146af6 (accessed: 01.07.2021).
Bertelsmann Stiftung (ed.) Policy performance and governance capacities in the OECD and EU, Sustainable Governance Indicators 2018. Gütersloh, BS, 2018, available at: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/SGI_Projektbroschuere_2018_englisch.pdf (accessed: 02.07.2021).
Transparency International (28.1.2021). Press release. 2020 Corruption Perceptions Index reveals widespread corruption is weakening COVID-19 response, threatening global recovery, r. 1. Corruption and COVID-19 worsening democratic backsliding, available at: https://www.transparency.org/en/press/2020-corruption-perceptions-index-reveals-widespread-corruption-is-weakening-covid-19-response-threatening-global-recovery (accessed: 01.07.2021).
Bertelsmann Stiftung (ed.). Sustainable Governance Indicators 2020, Greece. Gütersloh, BS, 2020, available at: https://www.sgi-network.org/2020/Greece (accessed: 02.07.2021).
Ministry of Justice, General Secretariat against Corruption (February 2017). Mapping of judicial, auditing, prosecutorial, administrative, independent and supervisory authorities, services and organs/bodies participating in the network of anti-corruption. Athens, MoJ.
Transparency International. Global Corruption Barometer European Union. Kukutschka, R. M. B., Berlin, TI, 2021, available at: https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/TI_GCB_EU_2021_web.pdf (accessed: 25.08.2021).
Kaiser G. Probleme der Korruption und Ihrer Bekämpfung. Science and Society. 2005. Vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 19–43.
Luhmann N. Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, 1993.
Voigt R. Recht — Spielball der Politik? Rechtspolitologie im Zeichen der Globalisierung: 4th ed. Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2020.
Rothe D. L. Facilitating corruption and human rights violations: The role of international financial institutions. Crime, Law and Social Change. 2010. Vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-010-9236-7.
Загрузки
Опубликован
29.01.2022
Как цитировать
Ламбропоулоу, Э. (2022). Лики Януса в антикоррупционной риторике в Греции. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Социология, 14(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2021.304
Выпуск
Раздел
Социальные процессы и социальная динамика
Лицензия
Статьи журнала «Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Социология» находятся в открытом доступе и распространяются в соответствии с условиями Лицензионного Договора с Санкт-Петербургским государственным университетом, который бесплатно предоставляет авторам неограниченное распространение и самостоятельное архивирование.
