Опыт качественного исследования деинституциализации института журналистики

Зинаида Олеговна Серебрякова

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu12.2016.304

Authors

Зинаида Олеговна Серебрякова Samara National Research University, 34, Moskovskoye shosse, Samara, 443086, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu12.2016.304

Abstract

This article describes the experience of qualitative social research of some aspects of the phenomenon of Russian journalism deinstitutionalization — which expresses features of institutional order demonopolization, deconstruction and decentralization. Unlike a number of related formal terms (for example, new media or alternative media), journalism deinstitutionalization points meaningfully to the whole complex of objective and subjective counter-institutional tendencies in the social institution of journalism. Journalism deinstitutionalization has two dimensions: internal and external. External deinstitutionalization occurs, under the influence of modern communication technologies, the so-called creative audience, much of which produces and distributes socially meaningful content by itself that creates a situation of “chaos paradigm” in communications. It demonopolizes expert (professional) journalistic knowledge and allows it to engage in a wide range of “amateurs”. The internal deinstitutionalization is a personal (hidden or open) protest of professional journalist against institutional coercion of journalistic organization, it’s a specific form of professional ethics, the desire to follow a professional mission and being guided by the merits of the journalistic case, even if it runs counter to the dominant institutional logic. The article gives the results of indepth interviews with an expert and an non-expert groups of respondents. The author poses several research questions suitable for research, including: is there a process of journalism deinstitutionalization? What is it’s expression? What are the trends in modern journalism’s isolated representatives of the journalistic sphere (professional journalists and bloggers) and information consumers? Also raised is the question of trust in modern media sources. The conclusion is that there are signs of total distrust in media resources in a professional environment and environment of information consumers. Refs 19.

Keywords:

institutions, deinstitutionalization, journalism, media, trust, interview

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Фомичева И. Д. СМИ среди средств социальной коммуникации // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 10: Журналистика. 2012. № 1. С. 60–72.

Виноградский В. С. Публицистический диалог — надежный ресурс публичности и эффективности современных средств массовой информации // Вопросы теории и практики журналистики. 2015. Т. 4, № 2. С. 183–193.

Зиновьев И. В. Журналистика в информационном обществе: технологические итоги и творческие перспективы // Известия Уральского федерального университета. Сер. 1: Проблемы образования, науки и культуры. 2012. № 1 (98). С. 14–20.

Журналистика и конвергенция: почему и как традиционные СМИ превращаются в мультимедийные / под ред. А. Г. Качкаевой. М.: Аспект-пресс, 2010. 200 с.

Waisbord S. Watchdog journalism in South America: News, accountability, and democracy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000. 282 p.

Christen C. T., Gunther A. C. The influence of mass media and other culprits on the projection of personal opinion // Communication Research. 2003. Vol. 30 (4). P. 414–431.

Quinn S. Convergent Journalism: The Fundamentals of Multimedia Reporting. New York: Peter Lang, 2005. 256 p.

Pavlic J. V. New Media Journalism // 21st Century Communication. A Reference Handbook. Vol. 1&2 / ed. by W. F. Eadie. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009. P. 643–651.

Watson J. Media communication: An introduction to theory and process. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. 328 p.

Серебрякова З. О. О понятии деинституциализации журналистики. Журналистика и теория медиа // Коммуникология. 2016. Т. 4, № 1. С. 151–159.

Дернер К. Хороший врач: учебник основной позиции врача / пер. И. Я. Сапожниковой и Э. Л. Гушанского, под ред. М. В. Козырева. М.: Алетейя, 2006. 544 с.

Лехциер В. Л. «Простой смертный» или «Человек с улицы» // Вестник Самарской гуманитарной академии. Сер.: Философия. Филология. 2010. № 2. С. 101–108.

Atton Ch., Hamilton J. F. Alternative journalism. London: Sage, 2008. 192 p.

Mansell R. Collective action, institutionalism, and the internet // Journal of Economic Issues. 2006. Vol. 40 (2). P. 297–305.

Kuznetsov S., Paulos E. Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Projects, Communities, and Cultures // Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. New York: ACM. 2010, P. 295–304.

Соколова Н. В. Популярная культура Web 2.0: к картографии современного медиаландшафта: монография. Самара: Самар. ун-т, 2009. 204 с.

Citizen journalism: Global perspectives / eds S. Allan, E. Thorsen. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., 2009. 277 p.

Кастельс М. Власть коммуникации / пер. Н. М. Тылевич, под ред. А. И. Черных. М.: Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, 2016. 564 с.

McNair B. Cultural Chaos: journalism, news and power in a globalised world. London: Routledge, 2006. 248 p.

References

Fomicheva I. D. SMI sredi sredstv sotsial’noi kommunikatsii [Media among the means of social communication]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 10: Zhurnalistika [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 10: Journalism], 2012, no. 1, pp. 60–72. (In Russian)

Vinogradskii V. S. Publitsisticheskii dialog — nadezhnyi resurs publichnosti i effektivnosti sovremennykh sredstv massovoi informatsii [Journalistic dialogue — a reliable resource of publicity and efficiency of modern media]. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki [Theory and practice of journalism], 2015, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 183–193. (In Russian)

Zinov’ev I. V. Zhurnalistika v informatsionnom obshchestve: tekhnologicheskie itogi i tvorcheskie perspektivy [Journalism in the information society: the results of the technological and creative perspectives]. Izvestiia Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Ser. 1: Problemy obrazovaniia, nauki i kul’tury [Journal of Siberian Federal University. Series 1: Problems of education, science and culture], 2012, no. 1 (98), pp. 14–20.(In Russian)

Zhurnalistika i konvergentsiia: pochemu i kak traditsionnye SMI prevrashchaiutsia v mul’timediinye[Journalism and convergence: why and how traditional media become in multimedia]. Ed. by A. G. Kachkaeva. Moscow, Aspekt-press, 2010. 200 p. (In Russian)

Waisbord S. Watchdog journalism in South America: News, accountability, and democracy. New York, Columbia University Press, 2000. 282 p.

Christen C. T., Gunther A. C. The influence of mass media and other culprits on the projection of personal opinion. Communication Research, 2003, vol. 30 (4), pp. 414–431.

Quinn S. Convergent Journalism: The Fundamentals of Multimedia Reporting. New York, Peter Lang Publ., 2005. 256 p.

Pavlic J. V. New Media Journalism. 21st Century Communication. A Reference Handbook. Vol. 1&2. Ed. by W. F. Eadie. New York, Columbia University Press, 2009, pp. 643–651.

Watson J. Media communication: An introduction to theory and process. London, Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2008. 328 p.

Serebriakova Z. O. O poniatii deinstitutsializatsii zhurnalistiki. Zhurnalistika i teoriia media [On the concept of journalism deinstitutionalization. Journalism and media theory]. Kommunikologiia [Communicology], 2016, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 151–159. (In Russian)

Derner K. Khoroshii vrach: uchebnik osnovnoi pozitsii vracha [Good doctor. Tutorial basic positions of the doctor]. Transl. by I. Ia. Sapozhnikova and E. L. Gushanskogii, ed. by M. V. Kozyrev. Moscow, Aleteia Publ., 2006. 544 p. (In Russian)

Lekhtsier V. L. «Prostoi smertnyi» ili «Chelovek s ulitsy» [«Mere mortal» or «Man on the street»]. Vestnik Samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. Ser.: Filosofiia. Filologiia [Vestnik of Samara humanitarian Academy. Series: Philosophy. Philology], 2010, no. 2, pp. 101–108. (In Russian)

Atton Ch., Hamilton J. F. Alternative journalism. London, Sage Publ., 2008. 192 p.

Mansell R. Collective action, institutionalism, and the internet. Journal of Economic Issues, 2006, vol. 40 (2), pp. 297–305.

Kuznetsov S., Paulos E. Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Projects, Communities, and Cultures. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. New York, ACM Publ., 2010, pp. 295–304.

Sokolova N. V. Populiarnaia kul’tura Web 2.0: k kartografii sovremennogo medialandshafta: monografiia[Popular culture Web 2.0: mapping modern media landscape: monograph]. Samara, Samara University, 2009. 204 p. (In Russian)

Citizen journalism: Global perspectives. Eds S. Allan, E. Thorsen. New York, Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., 2009. 277 p.

Kastel’s M. Vlast’ kommunikatsii [Power of communication]. Transl. by N. M. Tylevich, ed. by A. I. Chernykh. Moscow, Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2016. 564 p. (In Russian)

McNair B. Cultural Chaos: journalism, news and power in a globalised world. London, Routledge, 2006. 248 p.