Social innovation in Russian cities: Assessing service management potential
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2022.407Abstract
The article presents a method for assessing the potential of social innovations in the cities of the Russian Federation based on the use of quality of life indicators provided by VEB.RF. The social innovative potential is the presence of a set of socio-economic development conditions that positively influence the creation, dissemination and use of innovations, both technical and managerial, in the provision of social services. In the course of the study a hierarchical clustering of the cities according to the obtained comprehensive assessment using Ward’s method was carried out. It was established that the cluster with high potential for emergence and development of social innovations includes only two cities out of studied 51 ones, the largest number of cities are included in the cluster with low level of potential. A high level of potential has been identified in small single-industry towns, with a homogenised population engaged in high-tech industry, with a high level of self-organisation and civic engagement. The population of cities with the lowest levels of potential is characterised by high levels of fragmentation, which is not compensated by higher levels of income. The key factors determining the potential are the activity of interaction within communities and the presence of organisations that carry out their activities in the social services sector. Thus, it can be assumed that increasing the potential for social innovation in Russian cities depends on the communication competences of local authorities and the establishment of a functioning system of social entrepreneurship, which brings to the fore the problem of integrating modern effective management methods into the social services sector.
Keywords:
social innovation, services sector, management, innovative potential, local government
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Доклад о реализации мер по обеспечению поэтапного доступа негосударственных организаций, осуществляющих деятельность в социальной сфере, к бюджетным средствам, выделяемым на предоставление социальных услуг населению, за 2020 г. URL: https://admtyumen.ru/files/upload/OIV/D_soc-r/Доклад%20о%20реализации%20мер%20по%20обеспечению%20поэтапного%20доступа%20негосударственных%20организаций%20к%20бюджетным%20средстввам%20в%202020%20году.pdf (дата обращения: 18.05.2022).
Вьюнов С.С., Клыпин А.В. К вопросу оценки востребованности результатов исследований и разработок реальным сектором экономики и отраслями социальной сферы // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2022. Т. 4, № 1. С. 122–142.
Соколова С.В.Социальная сфера как объект управления // Вестник Университета. 2015. № 6. С. 251–253.
Лихнович Ю.Ю. Социальная сфера и социальная инфраструктура: подходы к определению // Проблемы экономики, финансов и управления производством: сборник научных трудов вузов России. 2008. № 25. C. 304–310.
Абубакиров Р.Ф. Социальная сфера как составляющая общественного сектора современной экономики // Вестник экономики, права и социологии. 2007. № 3. С. 118–123.
Samuelson P.A. The pure theory of public expenditure // The review of economics and statistics. 1954. Vol. 36, no. 4. P. 387–389.
Аубакирова К.И., Голубева А.А., Соколова Е.В. Мотивация электронного участия граждан в развитии города (на примере портала «Наш Санкт-Петербург») // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Менеджмент. 2021. № 20 (2). С. 263–290. http://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2021.206
Pol E., Ville S. Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? // The Journal of socio-economics. 2009. Vol. 38, no. 6. P. 878–885.
Герсонская И.В. Государственная социальная политика на современном этапе развития России // Социально-экономические явления и процессы. 2020. Т. 15, № 2 (109). С. 5–16.
Sinclair S., Mazzei M., Baglioni S., Roy M.J. Social innovation, social enterprise, and local public services: Undertaking transformation? // Social Policy & Administration. 2018. Vol. 52, no. 7. P. 1317–1331.
Oosterlynck, S., Novy A., Kazepov Yu. Local social innovation to combat poverty and social exclusion: a critical appraisal. Bristol: Policy Press, 2019.
Massey A. Persistent public management reform: an egregore of liberal authoritarianism? // Public Money & Management. 2018. no. 39. P. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1448160
Cajaiba-Santana G. Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2014. Vol. 82. Social innovation. P. 42–51.
Шумпетер Й.А. Теория экономического развития. М.: Прогресс, 1982.
Устинова К.А. Социальные инновации: эффекты от реализации и перспективы развития // Вопросы инновационной экономики. 2020. Т. 10, № 3. С. 1815–1830.
Mulgan G., Tucker S., Ali R., Sanders B. Social innovation: what it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated. London: Young Foundation, 2007.
Hochgerner J. Social innovation // Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship / Carayannis E.G. (ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020.
Попов Е.В., Омонов Ж.К., Наумов И.В., Веретенникова А.Ю. Тенденции развития социальных инноваций // Terra Economicus. 2018. Т. 16, № 3. С. 35–59.
Целых М.П. Роль специалистов неформального и информального образования в социализации мигрантов в Великобритании // Глобальный научный потенциал. 2019. № 5 (98). С. 174–176.
Апокина К.В., Зубайдуллина В.Р. Социальное предпринимательство в Великобритании // Экономика и менеджмент инновационных технологий. 2019. № 6. URL: https://ekonomika.snauka.ru/2019/06/16602 (дата обращения: 04.04.2022).
Вольфсон С.В. К вопросу об истории становления инновационного предпринимательства. Международный опыт // Вестник Томского государственного университета. История. 2018. № 53. С. 112–115.
Голова И.М. Экосистемный подход к управлению инновационными процессами в российских регионах // Экономика региона. 2021. Т. 17. Вып. 4. С. 1346–1360. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-21
Лебедева Н. Феноменология и социология чужого: как связаны чуждость города и отчуждение людей внутри города // Versus. 2021. Т. 1, № 1. С. 290–306.
Рейтинг инновационного развития субъектов Российской Федерации. Вып. 6. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/rirr2019 (дата обращения: 09.05.2022).
ЗАТО Северск. Администрация ЗАТО Северск. URL: https://xn----7sbhlbh0a1awgee.xn--p1ai (дата обращения: 18.05.2022).
Официальный сайт города Салехард. URL: https://salekhard.org/ (дата обращения: 18.05.2022).
История Магнитогорска. URL: https://www.magnitogorsk.ru/content/o-gorode/istoriyamagnitogorska (дата обращения: 18.05.2022).
Полтавская Т.Н., Лаптева Ю.И. Реформаторский тренд в местном самоуправлении и перспективы развития Воронежской области // Проблемы эффективности государственной власти: внешние и внутренние факторы динамичного развития России. Материалы 5-й Межрегиональной научно-практической конференции. Воронеж: Изд-во Воронежского филиала РАНХиГС, 2019. С. 117–121.
References
Report on the implementation of measures to ensure gradual access of non-state organizations operating in the social sphere to budgetary funds allocated for the provision of social services to the population in 2020. Available at: https://admtyumen.ru/files/upload/OIV/D_soc-r/Доклад%20о%20реализации%20мер%20по%20обеспечению%20поэтапного%20доступа%20негосударственных%20организаций%20к%20бюджетным%20средстввам%20в%202020%20году.pdf (accessed: 09.09.2022). (In Russian)
Vyunov S. S., Klypin A.V. To the question of assessing the demand for research and development results by the real sector of the economy and industries of the social sphere. Upravlenie naukoi: teoriia i praktika, 2022, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 122–142. (In Russian)
Sokolova S.V. Social sphere as an object of management. Vestnik Universiteta, 2015, no. 6, pp. 251–253. (In Russian)
Likhnovich Yu. Yu. The social sphere and social infrastructure: approaches to definition. Problemy ekonomiki, finansov i upravleniia proizvodstvom: sbornik nauchnyh trudov vuzov Rossii, 2008, no. 25, pp. 304–310. (In Russian)
Abubakirov R.F. The social sphere as a component of the public sector of the modern economy. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii, 2007, no. 3, pp. 118–123. (In Russian)
Samuelson P.A. The pure theory of public expenditure. The review of economics and statistics, 1954, Vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 387–389.
Aubakirova K.I., Golubeva A.A., Sokolova E.V. Motivation of electronic participation of citizens in the development of the city (on the example of the portal of “Our St Petersburg”). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, 2021, no. 20 (2), pp. 263–290. http://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2021.206 (In Russian)
Pol E., Ville S. Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2009, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 878–885.
Gersonskaya I.V. State social policy at the present stage of Russia’s development. Sotsial’noekonomicheskie iavleniia i protsessy, 2020, vol. 15, no. 2 (109), pp. 5–16. (In Russian)
Sinclair S., Mazzei M., Baglioni S., Roy M.J. Social innovation, social enterprise, and local public services: Undertaking transformation? Social Policy & Administration, 2018, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1317–1331.
Oosterlynck S., Novy A., Kazepov Yu. Local social innovation to combat poverty and social exclusion: a critical appraisal. Bristol, Policy Press, 2019.
Massey A. Persistent public management reform: an egregore of liberal authoritarianism? Public Money & Management, 2018, no. 39, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1448160
Cajaiba-Santana G. Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, vol. 82. Social innovation, pp. 42–51.
Schumpeter J.A. Theory of Economic Development. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1982. (In Russian)
Ustinova K.A. Social innovations: the effects of implementation and development prospects. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1815–1830. (In Russian)
Mulgan G., Tucker S., Ali R., Sanders B. Social Innovation: what it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated. London, Young Foundation, 2007.
Hochgerner J. Social Innovation. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Carayannis E.G. (ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020.
Popov E.V., Omonov Zh. K., Naumov I.V., Veretennikova A.Yu. Trends in the development of social innovations. Terra Economicus, 2018, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 35–59. (In Russian)
Tselikh M.P. The role of non-formal and informal education professionals in the socialization of migrants in Britain. Global’nyi nauchnyi potentsial, 2019, no. 5 (98), pp. 174–176. (In Russian)
Apokina K.V., Zubaidullina V.R. Social entrepreneurship in Great Britain. Ekonomika i menedzhment innovatsionnykh tekhnologii, 2019, no. 6. Available at: https://ekonomika.snauka.ru/2019/06/16602 (accessed: 04.04.2022). (In Russian)
Volfson S.V. On the history of the formation of innovative entrepreneurship. International experience. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriia, 2018, no. 53, pp. 112–115. (In Russian)
Golova I.M. Ecosystem approach to the management of innovation processes in Russian regions. Ekonomika regiona, 2021, vol. 17, iss. 4, pp. 1346–1360. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-21 (In Russian)
Lebedeva N. Phenomenology and the sociology of the alien: How the alienation of the city and the alienation of people within the city are related. Versus, 2021, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 290–306. (In Russian)
Rating of innovation development of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Iss. 6. Available at: https://issek.hse.ru/rirr2019 (accessed: 09.05.2022). (In Russian)
ZATO Seversk. Administration of ZATO Seversk. Available at: https://xn----7sbhlbh0a1awgee.xn--p1ai (accessed: 18.05.2022). (In Russian)
Official website of the city of Salekhard. Available at: https://salekhard.org/ (accessed 18.05.2022). (In Russian)
History of Magnitogorsk. Available at: https://www.magnitogorsk.ru/content/o-gorode/istoriyamagnitogorska (accessed: 18.05.2022). (In Russian)
Poltavskaya T.N., Lapteva Y.I. Reformatory trend in local self-government and prospects for development of the Voronezh Oblast. Problemy effektivnosti gosudarstvennoi vlasti: vneshnie i vnutrennie faktory dinamichnogo razvitiia Rossii. Materialy 5-i Mezhregional’noi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Voronezh, Voronezh branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Press, 2019, pp. 117–121. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
2023-04-28
How to Cite
Balashov, A. I., Vasilieva, E. A., & Stolyarova, D. A. (2023). Social innovation in Russian cities: Assessing service management potential. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 15(4), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2022.407
Issue
Section
Sociology of Knowledge, Science and Innovation
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
