Digital body image of users of devices for self-tracking

Authors

  • Elena S. Bogomiagkova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2023.205

Abstract

The article presents the results of an empirical study implemented in a combined strategy in 2020–2021 and aimed at studying digital practices of healthcare of megalopolis residents. One of the focuses of interest was digital self-tracking, namely, the ways users interact with data supplied by personal devices, and the construction of a body image as a result of this process. The analysis of the data obtained allowed us to formulate several conclusions. Thus, for a significant part of active users of digital devices, the generated visual content, expressed in quantitative form, is of significant interest. There is an effect of access to the “real” body as well as the risks of a gap between personal feelings and digital data. The following arguments are put forward in favor of digital information: 1) the gadget can record indicators that are not available at the level of bodily sensations; 2) it generates content in ways that go beyond the capabilities of an individual. When there are significant discrepancies between digital data
and subjective experience, as a rule, it is not about their opposition, but about the work of coordinating and “smoothing” information received from various sources. Data visualization forms an idea of the owners of digital devices about their physical condition and progress in achieving their goals. In some cases, the digital body image becomes a reason for communication on social networks and a way of self-presentation. For those who actively practice digital self-tracking, the body image is considered to be incomplete without information expressed in numerical form. Moreover, for feeling corporeality, the experience of vision turns out to be fundamentally significant today.

Keywords:

digital self-tracking, digital data, digital body image, visualization, interview, healthcare

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Латур Б. Как говорить о теле? Нормативное измерение исследований науки // Метаморфозы телесности: сб. ст. / под ред. И.В.Кузина. СПб.: Изд-во РХГА, 2015. С. 250–287.

Сивков Д.Ю. Множественное тело и этнографический релятивизм // Вестник Самарской гуманитарной академии. Серия «Философия. Филология». 2015. № 2 (18). С. 55–72.

Sharon T. Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare // Philosophy & Technology. 2017. Vol. 30, no. 1. P. 93–121.

Mayer-Schönberger V., Cukier K. Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013.

van Dijck J. Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology// Surveillance & Society. 2014. Vol. 12, no. 2. P. 197–208.

Mejias U.A., Couldry N. Datafication // Internet Policy Review. 2019. Vol. 8, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1428

Тополь Э. Искусственный интеллект в медицине: как умные технологии меняют подход к лечению / пер. А.Анваер; науч. ред. А.Гусев. М.: Интеллектуальная литература, 2021.

Mohr D., Zhang M., Schueller S. Personal sensing: Understanding mental health using ubiquitous sensors and machine learning // Annual review of clinical psychology. 2017. Vol. 13. P. 13–47.

Couldry N. Recovering critique in an age of datafication // New Media & Society. 2020. Vol. 22, no. 7. P. 1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912536

Mann S., Ferenbok J. New media and the power politics of sousveillance in a surveillance dominated world // Surveillance & Society. 2013. Vol. 11, no. 1/2. P. 18–34.

Mager A., Mayer K. Body data — data body: Tracing ambiguous trajectories of data bodies between empowerment and social control in the context of health // Zeitschrift für sozialen Fortschritt. 2019. Vol. 8, no. 2. P. 95–108.

Ruckenstein M. Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles // Societies. 2014. Vol. 4, no. 1. P. 68–84.

Heyen N.B.v From self-tracking to self-expertise: The production of self-related knowledge by doing personal science // Public Understanding of Science. 2020. Vol. 29, no. 2. P. 124–138.

Boldy A., Rapp A. Quantifying the body: Body image, body awareness and self-tracking technologies // Quantifying Quality of Life. Cham: Springer, 2022. P. 189–207.

Lupton D. ‘Not the Real Me’: Social imaginaries of personal data profiling // Cultural Sociology. 2021. Vol. 15. P. 3–21.

Богомягкова Е.С., Дупак А.А. Мобильное здравоохранение в действии: практики цифрового селф-трекинга студентов России и Европы // Научный результат. Социология и управление. 2021. Т. 7. № 2. С. 88–101.

Давыдова А.М., Солянова М.А., Соренсен К. Дисциплинарные практики цифрового селфтрекинга: между эмансипацией и контролем // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2021. № 1. С. 217–240.

Ним Е.Г. Студенческий дискурс о цифровом селф-трекинге: риторики и практики // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 2. С.191–211.

Lupton D. You are your data: Self-tracking practices and concepts of data // Lifelogging. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2016. P. 61–79.

Marcengo А., Rapp A. Visualization of human behavior data: The quantified self // Innovative Approaches of Data Visualization and Visual Analytics. Hershey: IGI Global, 2013. P. 1–27.

References

Latour B. How to talk about the body? Normative measurement of scientific research. In: I. V. Kuzin (ed.). Metamorphoses of physicality: collection of articles. St. Petersburg, 2015, pp. 250–287. (In Russian)

Sivkov D.Yu. Multiple body and ethnographic relativism. Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. Series “Philosophy. Philology”, 2015, vol. 2, no. 18, pp. 55–72. (In Russian)

Sharon T. Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare, Philosophy & Technology, 2017, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 93–121.

Mayer-Schönberger V., Cukier K. Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. New York, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013.

van Dijck J. Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 2014, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 197–208.

Couldry N. Datafication. Internet Policy Review, 2019, vol. 8, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1428

Topol E. Artificial intelligence in medicine: how smart technologies change the approach to treatment: translated from English. Moscow, 2021. (In Russian)

Mohr D., Zhang M., Schueller S. Personal sensing: Understanding mental health using ubiquitous sensors and machine learning. Annual review of clinical psychology, 2017, vol. 13, pp. 13–47.

Couldry N. Recovering critique in an age of datafication. New Media & Society, 2020, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912536

Mann S., Ferenbok J. New media and the power politics of sousveillance in a surveillance dominated world. Surveillance & Society, 2013, vol. 11, no. 1/2, pp. 18–34.

Mager, A., Mayer, K. Body data — data body: Tracing ambiguous trajectories of data bodies between empowerment and social control in the context of health. Zeitschrift für sozialen Fortschritt, 2019, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 95–108.

Ruckenstein M. Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies, 2014, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 68–84.

Heyen N.B. From self-tracking to self-expertise: The production of self-related knowledge by doing personal science. Public Understanding of Science, 2020, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 124–138.

Boldy A., Rapp A. Quantifying the body: Body image, body awareness and self-tracking technologies. In: Quantifying Quality of Life. Cham, Springer, 2022, pp. 189–207.

Lupton D. ‘Not the Real Me’: Social imaginaries of personal data profiling. Cultural Sociology, 2021, vol. 15, pp. 3–21.

Bogomyagkova E. S., Dupak A.A. Mobile healthcare in action: Digital self-tracking practices of students in Russia and Europe. Research Result. Sociology and management, 2021, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 88–10. (In Russian)

Davydova A.M., Solyanova M.A., Sorensen K. Disciplinary digital self-tracking practices: Between emancipation and control. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2021, no. 1, pp. 217–240.

Nim E.G. Student discourse on digital self-tracking: rhetorics and practices. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2020, no. 2, pp. 191–211. (In Russian)

Lupton D. You are your data: Self-tracking practices and concepts of data. In: Lifelogging. Wiesbaden, Springer VS, 2016, pp. 61–79. (In Russian)

Marcengo А., Rapp A. Visualization of human behavior data: The quantified self. In: Innovative Approaches of Data Visualization and Visual Analytics. Hershey, IGI Global, 2013, pp. 1–27.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-18

How to Cite

Bogomiagkova, E. S. (2023). Digital body image of users of devices for self-tracking. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 16(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2023.205

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology

Section

SOCIOLOGY OF THE VISUAL

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.