Computational propaganda: Structural characteristics and vectors of research

Authors

  • Valeria V. Vasilkova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9 Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9335-8738
  • Pavel A. Trekin  St. Petersburg State University, 7–9 Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2020.105

Abstract

The term “computer propaganda” appeared several years ago because of the intersection of a number of sciences (computer sciences, political science, sociology, linguistics, social psychology, etc.). This phenomenon attracts attention for both technological and societal reasons. Therefore, the authors aim to reveal and analyze the main vectors of the development of theoretical concept of computer propaganda from the standpoint of the socio-communication approach. For this purpose, they identify the main structural characteristics of the concept corresponding to the characteristics of the process of information influence (object of propaganda, forms, channels, subjects of propaganda). Based on this position, the authors consider the original concept of propaganda presented in classical works on theory and practice of propaganda, and reveal the specifics of the new concept of computer propaganda. New characteristics of the target propaganda audience, a segmented structure of network virtual communities with the property of uncritical perception of “convenient and familiar” information, form specific features of the computer propaganda object. The authors outline that purposefully designed and circulated fake information in social networks is a new form of computer propaganda, and social bots as algorithmized programs, that allow for such distribution with maximum speed and scale, are a new channel of distribution for such information. The subjects of computer propaganda are the new political and business elites that have joined forces with representatives of the technological elite. In addition, current negative connotations dominate in the interpretation of computer propaganda as a communicative practice of using new computer technologies for manipulation and disinformation in online space. In conclusion, the authors discuss the possible perspectives of this topic, related to the understanding of the broader (neutral-information) context in understanding the phenomenon of computer propaganda.

Keywords:

propaganda, object and subject of propaganda, fakes, social bots

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Woolley S. C., Howard P. N. Computational propaganda: political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Oxford University Press, 2018. 263 p.

Corneliu В. The Ethics of Countering Digital Propaganda // Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. 2018. Vol. 32, iss. 3. P. 305–315. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ethics-andinternational-affairs/article/ethics-of-countering-digital-propaganda/DF393C0793F31EE0940E9208E24CB6A8 (дата обращения: 10.12.2019).

Ncube L. Digital Media, Fake News and Pro-Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) Alliance Cyber-Propaganda during the 2018 Zimbabwe Election // African Journalism Studies. 2019. Vol. 40. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/figure/10.1080/23743670.2019.1670225?scroll=top&needAccess=true (дата обращения: 10.12.2019).

Chomsky N. Media Control: the Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda. New York: Seven Stories Press, 2004. 112 p.

Cunningham S. The Idea of Propaganda: A Reconstruction. Westport: Praeger, 2002. 248p.

Rutherford P. Endless Propaganda: the Advertising of Public Goods. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000. 365 p.

Akin Unver H. Digital Challenges to Democracy: Politics of Automation, Attention and Engagement // Journal of International Affairs. 2017. Vol. 71, no. 1. P. 127–146.

Schiffrin A. Disinformation and Democracy: The Internet Transformed Protest but Did Not Improve Democracy // Journal of International Affairs. 2017. Vol. 71, no. 1. P. 117–126.

Bradshaw S., Howard F. The Global Organization of Social Media Disinformation Campaigns // Journal of International Affairs. 2017. Vol. 71, no. 1. P. 23–32.

Василькова В. В., Легостаева Н. И. Социальные боты в политической коммуникации // Вестник РУДН. Сер. «Социология». 2019, № 1. C. 121–131.

Wood A. Propaganda and Democracy // Theoria: An International Journal for Theory. 2016. Vol. 31, no. 3. P. 381–394.

Stanley J. How Propaganda Works. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.

Бернейс Э. Пропаганда / пер. с англ. И. Ющенко. М.: Hippo Publishing, 2010.

Цуладзе А. М. Политические манипуляции, или Покорение толпы. М.: Книжный дом «Университет», 1999.

Предвечный Г. П., Шерковин Ю. А. Социальная психология. Краткий очерк. М.: Политиздат, 1975.

Аронсон Э., Пратканис Э. Эпоха пропаганды: механизмы убеждения, повседневное использование и злоупотребление. СПб.: Прайм-Еврознак, 2003.

Войтасик Л. Психология политической пропаганды. М.: Прогресс, 1981.

Кара-Мурза С. Манипуляция сознанием. М.: Эксмо, 2006.

Лассвелл Г. Техника пропаганды в мировой войне. М.; Л.: Госуд. изд-во; отдел военной лит-ры, 1929.

Лебон Г. Психология толп. М.: Ин-т психол. РАН; изд-во «КСП+», 1998.

Халперн Д. Психология критического мышления. СПб.: Питер, 2000.

Taylor P. M. Munitions of the mind: A history of propaganda from the ancient world to the present day. Manchester; New York: Manchester University Press; 3rd ed. 2003.

Lasswell H. D. The Theory of Political Propaganda // The American Political Science Review. 1927. Vol. 21, no. 3. P. 627–631.

Щедровицкая М. Патрик Шампань: делать мнение // Со-Общение. 1999. № 1. URL: http://www.soob.ru/n/1999/1/5/1 (дата обращения: 10.12.2019).

Володенков С. В. Влияние технологий интернет-коммуникаций на современные общественно-политические процессы: сценарии, вызовы и акторы // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2019. № 5. С. 341–365.

Hasher L., Goldstein D., Toppino T. Frequency and the conference of referential validity // Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1977. No. 16 (1). Р. 107–112.

Fazio L. K., Brashier N. M., Payne B. K., Marsh E. J. Knowledge Does Not Protect Against Illusory Truth // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2015. Vol. 144, no. 5. P. 993–1002.

Friggeri A., Adamic L. A., Eckles D., Cheng J. Rumor Cascades // Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Michigan, USA. 2014, June 1–4. Published by The AAAI Press, Palo Alto, California. Р. 101–110.

Bakshy E., Eckles D., Yan R., Rosenn I. Social influence in social advertising: evidence from field experiments // Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC ‘12). 2012. ACM, New York, USA. P. 146–161.

Bakshy E., Messing S., Adamic L. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook // Research Reports. Political Science. 2015. Vol. 348, iss. 6239. Р. 1130–1132.

Василькова В. В., Садчиков Д. И. Фейки и боты как механизмы информационных искажений в социальных сетях // Казанский социально-гуманитарный вестник. 2019. № 2. С. 24–30.

Conroy N. J., Rubin V. L., Chen Y. Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news// ASIST’15. Proceedings of the 78th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Information Science with Impact: Research in and for the Community. St. Louis, Missouri. 2015. November 6–10. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010082 (дата обращения: 09.12.2019).

Klein D. O., Wueller J. R. Fake news: A legal perspective // Journal of Internet Law. 2017. Vol. 20, no. 10. P. 5–13.

Pérez-Rosas V., Kleinberg B., Lefevre A., Mihalcea R. Automatic Detection of Fake News // Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. August 2018. Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. Publisher: Association for Computational Linguistics. P. 3391–3401.

Wu K., Yang S., Zhu K. Q. False rumors detection on Sina Weibo by propagation structures // IEEE 31st International Conference on Data Engineering 13–17 April 2015. URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7113322 (дата обращения: 10.12.2019).

Shu K., Sliva A., Wang S., Tang J., Liu H. Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective // ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. 2017. Vol. 19, iss. 1. P. 22–36.

Ferrara E., Varol O., Davis C., Menczer F., Flammini A. The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM. 2016. Vol. 59, no. 7. P. 96–104. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717 (дата обращения: 12.12.2019).

Stieglitz S., Brachten F., Ross B., Jung A.-K. Do Social Bots Dream of Electric Sheep? A Categorisation of Social Media Bot Accounts. Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Hobart, Australia. 2017. URL: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1710/1710.04044.pdf]. (дата обращения: 10.12.2019).

Metaxas P. T., Mustafaraj E. Social media and the elections // Science. 2012. Vol. 338, no. 6106. P. 472–473. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230456.

Bessi A., Ferrara E. Social Bots Distort the 2016 US Presidential Election Online Discussion. // First Monday. 2016. Vol. 21, no. 11. URL: https://firstmonday.org/article/view/7090/5653 (дата обращения: 11.12.2019).

Howard P. N., Bolsover G., Kollanyi B., Bradshaw S., Neudert L. Junk news and bots during the U. S. Election: What were Michigan voters sharing over Twitter? // CompProp, OII Data Memo: Project on Computational Propaganda. 2017. Vol. 1. URL: https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/working-papers/junk-news-and-bots-during-the-u-s-election-what-were-michigan-voters-sharing-over-twitter/ (дата обращения: 11.12.2019).

Schäfer F., Evert S., Heinrich P. Japan’s 2014 General Election: Political Bots, Right-Wing Internet Activism, and Prime Minister Shinzō Abe’s Hidden Nationalist Agenda // Big data. Vol. 5, no. 4. P. 294–309.

Forelle M. C., Howard P. N., Monroy-Hernandez A., Savage S. Political bots and the manipulation of public opinion in Venezuela // CompProp, OII Data Memo: Project on Computational Propaganda. 2015. Vol. 1. URL: http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/89/2015/08/COMPROP-2015-1.pdf (дата обращения: 11.12.2019).

Arnaudo D. Computational Propaganda in Brazil: Social Bots During Elections // Project on Computational Propaganda. 2017. Vol. 8. P. 1–39. URL: https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/working-papers/computational-propaganda-in-brazil-social-bots-during-elections/ (дата обращения: 11.12.2019).

Varol O., Ferrara E., Davis C. A., Menczer F., Flammini A. Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization // Eleventh international AAAI conference on web and social media. 2017. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314433388_Online_Human-Bot_Interactions_Detection_Estimation_and_Characterization (дата обращения: 12.11.2019).

Manovich L. The Science of Culture? Social Computing, Digital Humanities and Cultural Analytics. URL: http://manovich.net/content/04-projects/088-cultural-analytics-social-computing/cultural_analytics_article_final.pdf (дата обращения: 11.12.2019).

Володенков С. А. Цифровые технологии как фактор изменения отношений в системе «государство — общество» // Навстречу «цифровому обществу»: экспертные оценки и прогнозы. М.: Наука, 2019. С. 9–12.

Василькова В. В., Легостаева Н. И., Радушевский В. Б. Социальные боты как инструмент развития гражданского участия // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2019. № 5. С. 19–42.

Velázquez E., Yazdani M., Suárez-Serrato P. Socialbots supporting human rights. AIES ‘18 Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. New Orleans, LA, USA, 2017. P. 290–296.

Ford H., Puschmann C., Dubois D. Keeping Ottawa Honest, One Tweet at a Time? Politicians, journalists, Wikipedians and their Twitter bots // International Journal of Communication. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 4891–4914.

Hwang T., Woolley S. How Politicians Should and Shouldn’t Use Twitter Bots // Slate. 2016. URL: https://slate.com/technology/2016/03/how-politicians-should-use-twitter-bots.html (дата обращения: 11.12.2019).


References

Woolley S. C., Howard P. N. Computational propaganda: political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Oxford University Press, 2018.

Corneliu В. The Ethics of Countering Digital Propaganda. Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, 2018, vol. 32, iss. 3, pp. 305–315. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ethics-andinternational-affairs/article/ethics-of-countering-digital-propaganda/DF393C0793F31EE0940E9208E24CB6A8 (accessed: 10.12.2019).

Ncube L. Digital Media, Fake News and Pro-Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) Alliance Cyber-Propaganda during the 2018 Zimbabwe Election. African Journalism Studies, 2019, vol. 40. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/figure/10.1080/23743670.2019.1670225?scroll=top&needAccess=true (accessed: 10.12.2019).

Chomsky N. Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda. New York, Seven Stories Press, 2004.

Cunningham S. The Idea of Propaganda: A Reconstruction. Westport, Praeger, 2002.

Rutherford P. Endless Propaganda: The Advertising of Public Goods. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2000.

Akin Unver H. Digital Challenges to Democracy: Politics of Automation, Attention and Engagement. Journal of International Affairs, 2017, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 127–146.

Schiffrin A. Disinformation and Democracy: the Internet Transformed Protest but Did Not Improve Democracy. Journal of International Affairs, 2017, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 117–126.

Bradshaw S, Howard F. The Global Organization of Social Media Disinformation Campaigns. Journal of International Affairs, 2017, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 23–32.

Vasil’kova V. V., Legostaeva N. I. Social bots in political communication. Vestnik RUDN. Seriia Sotsiologiia, 2019, no. 1, pp. 121–131. (In Russian)

Wood A. Propaganda and Democracy. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, 2016, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 381–394.

Stanley J. How Propaganda Works. Princeton, Princeton University Press. 2015.

Berneis E. Propaganda, transl. by I. Iushchenko. Moscow, Hippo Publishing, 2010. (In Russian)

Tsuladze A. M. Political manipulation or conquering the crowd. Moscow, Knizhnyi dom Universitet Publ., 1999. (In Russian)

Predvechnyi G. P., Sherkovin Iu. A. Social psychology. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1975. (In Russian)

Aronson E., Pratkanis E. Age of propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion. St. Petersburg, Praim-EVROZNAK Publ., 2003. (In Russian)

Voitasik L. Psychology of political propaganda. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1981. (In Russian)

Kara-Murza S. Mind manipulation. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2006. ( In Russian)

Lassvell G. Propaganda Technique in the World War. Moscow, Leningrad, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo; otdel voennoi literatury Publ., 1929. (In Russian)

Lebon G. Psychology of a crowd. Moscow, In-t psikhologii RAN, KSP Publ., 1998. (In Russian)

Khalpern D. Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2000. (In Russian)

Taylor P. M. Munitions of the mind: A history of propaganda from the ancient world to the present day. Manchester; New York, 1995.

Lasswell H. D. The Theory of Political Propaganda. The American Political Science Review, 1927, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 627–631.

Shchedrovitskaia M. Patrik Champagne: make an opinion. So-Obshchenie, 1999, no. 1. Available at: http://www.soob.ru/n/1999/1/5/1 (accessed: 10.12.2019). (In Russian)

Volodenkov S. V. The influence of Internet communication technology on modern socio-political processes: scenarios, challenges and actors. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny, 2019, no. 5, pp. 341–365. (In Russian)

Hasher L., Goldstein D., Toppino T. Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977, no. 16 (1), pp. 107–112.

Fazio L. K., Brashier N. M., Payne B. K., Marsh E. J. Knowledge Does Not Protect Against Illusory Truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2015, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 993–1002.

Friggeri A., Adamic L. A., Eckles D., Cheng J. Rumor Cascades. Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Michigan, USA. June 1–4, 2014. Published by The AAAI Press, Palo Alto, California, pp. 101–110.

Bakshy E., Eckles D., Yan R, Rosenn I. Social influence in social advertising: evidence from field experiments. Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC ‘12). 2012. ACM, New York, USA, pp. 146–161.

Bakshy E., Messing S., Adamic L. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Research Reports. Political Science, 5 June 2015, vol. 348, iss. 6239, pp. 1130–1132.

Vasil’kova V. V., Sadchikov D. I. Fakes and bots as mechanisms of information distortion in social networks. Kazanskii sotsial’no-gumanitarnyi vestnik, 2019, no. 2, pp. 24–30. (In Russian)

Conroy N. J., Rubin V. L., Chen Y. Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news. ASIST’15. Proceedings of the 78th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Information Science with Impact: Research in and for the Community. St. Louis, Missouri. 2015. November 6–10. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010082 (accessed: 09.12.2019).

Klein D. O., Wueller J. R. Fake news: A legal perspective. Journal of Internet Law, 2017, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 5–13.

Pérez-Rosas V., Kleinberg B., Lefevre A., Mihalcea R. Automatic Detection of Fake News. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. August 2018. Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. Publisher Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 3391–3401.

Wu K., Yang S., Zhu K. Q. False rumors detection on Sina Weibo by propagation structures. IEEE 31st International Conference on Data Engineering 13–17 April 2015. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7113322 (accessed: 10.12.2019).

Shu K., Sliva A., Wang S., Tang J., Liu H. Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 2017, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 22–36.

Ferrara E., Varol O., Davis C., Menczer F., Flammini A. The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 2016, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717.

Stieglitz S., Brachten F., Ross B., Jung A.-K. Do Social Bots Dream of Electric Sheep? A Categorisation of Social Media Bot Accounts. Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Hobart, Australia. 2017. Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1710/1710.04044.pdf. (accessed: 10.12.2019).

Metaxas P. T., Mustafaraj E. Social media and the elections. Science, 2012, vol. 338, no. 6106, pp. 472–473. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230456.

Bessi A., Ferrara E. Social Bots Distort the 2016 US Presidential Election Online Discussion. First Monday, 2016, vol. 21, no. 11. Available at: https://firstmonday.org/article/view/7090/5653 (accessed: 11.12.2019).

Howard P. N., Bolsover G., Kollanyi B., Bradshaw S., Neudert L. Junk news and bots during the U. S. Election: What were Michigan voters sharing over Twitter? CompProp, OII Data Memo: Project on Computational Propaganda, 2017, vol. 1. Available at: https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/working-papers/junk-news-and-bots-during-the-u-s-election-what-were-michigan-voters-sharing-over-twitter/ (accessed: 11.12.2019).

Schäfer F., Evert S., Heinrich P. Japan’s 2014 General Election: Political Bots, Right-Wing Internet Activism, and Prime Minister Shinzō Abe’s Hidden Nationalist Agenda. Big data, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 294–309.

Forelle M. C., Howard P. N., Monroy-Hernandez A., Savage S. Political bots and the manipulation of public opinion in Venezuela. CompProp, OII Data Memo: Project on Computational Propaganda, 2015, vol. 1. Available at: http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/89/2015/08/COMPROP-2015-1.pdf (accessed: 11.12.2019).

Arnaudo D. Computational Propaganda in Brazil: Social Bots During Elections. Project on Computational Propaganda, 2017, vol. 8, pp. 1–39. Available at: https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/working-papers/computational-propaganda-in-brazil-social-bots-during-elections/ (accessed: 11.12.2019).

Varol O., Ferrara E., Davis C. A., Menczer F., Flammini A. Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization, in: Eleventh international AAAI conference on web and social media. 2017. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314433388_Online_Human-Bot_Interactions_Detection_Estimation_and_Characterization (accessed: 12.11.2019).

Manovich L. The Science of Culture? Social Computing, Digital Humanities and Cultural Analytics. Available at: http://manovich.net/content/04-projects/088-cultural-analytics-social-computing/cultural_analytics_article_final.pdf (accessed: 11.12.2019).

Volodenkov S. A. Digital technologies as a factor in changing relations in the state-society system. Navstrechu “tsifrovomu obshchestvu”: ekspertnye otsenki i prognozy. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2019, pp. 9–12.(In Russian)

Vasil’kova V. V., Legostaeva N. I., Radushevskii V. B. Social bots as a tool for the development of civic participation. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny, 2019, no. 5, pp. 19–42. (In Russian)

Velázquez E., Yazdani M., Suárez-Serrato P. Socialbots supporting human rights. AIES‘18 Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. New Orleans, LA, USA, 2017, pp. 290–296.

Ford H., Puschmann C., Dubois D. Keeping Ottawa Honest, One Tweet at a Time? Politicians, journalists, Wikipedians and their Twitter bots. International Journal of Communication, 2016, vol. 10, pp. 4891–4914.

Hwang T., Woolley S. How Politicians Should and Shouldn’t Use Twitter Bots. Slate, 2016. Available at: https://slate.com/technology/2016/03/how-politicians-should-use-twitter-bots.html (accessed: 11.12.2019).

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

How to Cite

Vasilkova, V. V. ., & Trekin , P. A. . (2020). Computational propaganda: Structural characteristics and vectors of research. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 13(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2020.105

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology.

Section

Language, Culture, Communication

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.