Communicative strategies of COVID-trolling on the VKontakte social network

Authors

  • Valeriya V. Vasilkova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9 Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Natalya I. Legostaeva St. Petersburg State University, 7–9 Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Polina M. Kruchinina St. Petersburg State University, 7–9 Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2021.306

Abstract

The activation of trolling accounts during the COVID-19 pandemic, which are usually associated with COVID dissidence and cast doubt on the effectiveness of measures taken to combat the pandemic, has actualized the problem of detecting potentially dangerous accounts on social networks and analyzing the communication strategies they use to influence network users. The article represents the first experience of studying trolling strategies in the discussion of COVID-19 by users of the Russian social network “VKontakte”. Using unique methodology to detect trolling accounts based on the analysis of bursts of network publication activity through comments, combined with the profiling of trolling accounts, allowed us to identify 8 trolling
accounts in the social network “VKontakte” from March 18 to June 10, 2020 according to the specified keywords. To identify their communication strategies, a system of indicators (tactics) was developed that correspond to the strategies of overt and covert trolling. An overt strategy includes such tactics as verbal aggression, emotional tension, provocation, call for confrontation, refuting the official point of view, humiliating the opponent, changing the topic of discussion. A covert strategy includes tactics of irony or ridicule, demonstrating authority, doubting the status quo, “naive questions” and misleading. As a result, it was shown that the analyzed trolling accounts use both overt and covert strategies of influence, with the more aggressive (overt) communicative strategy predominating. The article indicates the prospects
for the research topic’s development: identifying the specifics of COVID-trolling in relation to other contextual and thematic types of trolling; studying the dynamics of COVID-trolling at different stages of the pandemic and the features of COVID-trolling strategies implemented by users of various social networks and different countries; analyzing the degree of impact of COVID-trolling on users.

Keywords:

online trolling, COVID-19, communication strategy, overt trolling, covert trolling

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Авдеева Н. Н., Мещерякова Б. Г., Зинченко В. П. Большой психологический словарь. СПб.: Прайм-Еврознак, 2009.

Строителев Н. М. Троллинг как разновидность провокационного речевого поведения // Ученые записки ТОГУ. 2013. Т. 4, № 4. С. 663–668.

Бондаренко А. О. Троллинг как вид вербальной агрессии (на материале французского языка) // Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Гуманитарные науки. 2019. № 8 (824). С. 22–32.

Синельникова Л. Н. Дискурс троллинга // Дискурс-Пи. 2016. Т. 14, № 3–4. С. 271–279.

Воронцова Т. А. Троллинг и флейминг: речевая агрессия в интернет-коммуникации // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия «История и филология». 2016. Т. 26, № 2. С. 109–116.

Внебрачных Р. А. Троллинг как форма социальной агрессии в виртуальных сообществах // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия «Философия. Психология. Педагогика». 2012. № 1. С. 48–51.

Donath J. S. Identity and deception in the virtual community // Communities in Cyberspace / ed. by P. Kollock, M. Smith. London: Routledge, 1996.

Suler J. The Online Disinhibition Effect // Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 2004. Vol. 7, № 3. Р. 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295.

Тумский С. В. Троллинг как форма провокации в интернет-пространстве // Известия Санкт-Петербургского государственного экономического университета. 2020. № 5 (125). С. 213–218.

Gorwa R., Guilbeault D. Unpacking the Social Media Bot: A Typology to Guide Research and Policy // Policy & Internet. 2018. № 12 (3). Р. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.184.

Ratkiewicz J., Conover M. D., Meiss M., Flammini A., Menczer F. Detecting and tracking political abuse in social media // Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 2011. Vol. 5, № 1. Р. 1–9.

Булатова Е. И. Сетевые коммуникативные стратегии: троллинг // Вестник СПбГИК. 2017. № 2 (31). С. 75–78.

Hardaker C. Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions // Journal of Politeness Research. 2010. Vol. 6, № 2. Р. 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011.

Golf-Papez M., Veer E. Don’t feed the trolling: rethinking how online trolling is being defined and combated // Journal of Marketing Management. 2017. Vol. 33, № 15–16. Р. 1336–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1383298.

Kirman B., Lineham C., Lawson S. Exploring mischief and mayhem in social computing or: how we learned to stop worrying and love the trolls // CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2012. Р. 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212790.

Jachim P., Sharevski F., Treebridge P. TrollHunter [Evader]: Automated Detection [Evasion] of Twitter Trolls During the COVID-19 Pandemic // New Security Paradigms Workshop 2020. 2020. Р. 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442167.3442169/.

Зимбардо Ф., Ляйппе Ф. Социальное влияние. СПб.: Питер, 2001.

Василькова В. В., Легостаева Н. И. Социальные боты в компьютерной пропаганде: серфинг на информационной волне коронавируса // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 6. С. 329–356. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1762.

Акулич М. М. Интернет-троллинг: понятие, содержание и формы // Вестник ТюмГУ. Социология. 2012. № 8. С. 47–54.

Hardaker C. “Uh…. not to be nitpicky, but… the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.”: An overview of trolling strategies // Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. 2013. Vol. 1, № 1. Р. 58–86. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.04har.

Paakki H., Salovaara A., Vepsäläinen H. Do Online Trolling Strategies Differ in Political and Interest Forums: Early Results // Multidisciplinary International Symposium on Disinformation in Open Online Media. New York: Springer, 2020. Р. 191–204.

Capistrano J. L. C., Suarez J. J. P., Naval P. C. SALSA: Detection of Cybertrolls using Sentiment, Aggression, Lexical and Syntactic Analysis of Tweets // Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics. 2019. № 10. Р. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326467.3326471.

Fornacciari P., Mordonini M., Poggi A., Sani L., Tomaiuolo M. A holistic system for troll detection on Twitter // Computers in Human Behavior. 2018. Vol. 89. Р. 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.008.


References

Avdeeva N. N., Mescheryakova B. G., Zinchenko V. P. The Big Dictionary of Psychology. St. Petersburg, Prajm-Evroznak Publ., 2009. (In Russian)

Stroitelev N. M. Trolling as a type of provocative speech behavior. Uchenye zapiski TOGU, 2013, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 663–668. (In Russian)

Bondarenko A. O. Trolling as a type of verbal aggression (on the material of French). Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2019, no. 8 (824), pp. 22–32. (In Russian)

Sinelnikova L. N. Trolling Discourse. Diskurs-Pi, 2016, vol. 14, no. 3–4, pp. 271–279. (In Russian)

Vorontsova T. A. Trolling and Flaming: Speech Aggression in Internet Communication. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriia «Istoriia i filologiia», 2016, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 109–116. (In Russian)

Vnebrachnykh R. A. Trolling as a Form of Social Aggression in Virtual Communities. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriia «Filosofiia. Psikhologiia. Pedagogika», 2012, no. 1, pp. 48–51. (In Russian)

Donath J. S. Identity and deception in the virtual community. Communities in Cyberspace, ed. by P. Kollock, M. Smith. London, Routledge, 1996.

Suler J. The Online Disinhibition Effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 2004, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295.

Tumsky S. V. Trolling as a form of provocation in the Internet space. Izvestiia Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2020, vol. 5, no. 125, pp. 213–218.

Gorwa R., Guilbeault D. Unpacking the Social Media Bot: A Typology to Guide Research and Policy. Policy & Internet, 2018, no. 12 (3), pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.184.

Ratkiewicz J., Conover M. D., Meiss M., Flammini A., Menczer F. Detecting and tracking political abuse in social media. Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 2011, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–9.

Bulatova E. I. Network communication strategies: trolling. Vestnik SPbGIK, 2017, vol. 2, no. 31, pp. 75–78. (In Russian)

Hardaker C. Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 2010, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011.

Golf-Papez M., Veer E. Don’t feed the trolling: rethinking how online trolling is being defined and combated. Journal of Marketing Management, 2017, vol. 33, no. 15–16, pp. 1336–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1383298.

Kirman B., Lineham C., Lawson S. Exploring mischief and mayhem in social computing or: how we learned to stop worrying and love the trolls. CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, Association for Computing Machinery, 2012, pp. 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212790.

Jachim P., Sharevski F., Treebridge P. TrollHunter [Evader]: Automated Detection [Evasion] of Twitter Trolls During the COVID-19 Pandemic. New Security Paradigms Workshop 2020, 2020, pp. 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442167.3442169.

Zimbardo F., Leippe F. Social influence. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001. (In Russian)

Vasilkova V. V., Legostaeva N. I. Social bots in computer propaganda: surfing on the coronavirus information wave. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny, 2020, no. 6, pp. 329–356. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1762. (In Russian)

Akulich M. M. Internet-trolling: concept, content and forms. Vestnik TyumGU. Sotsiologiia, 2012, no. 8, pp. 47–54.

Hardaker C. “Uh…. not to be nitpicky, but… the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.”: An overview of trolling strategies. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 2013, vol. 1, no. 1. pp. 58–86. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.04har.

Paakki H., Salovaara A., Vepsäläinen H. Do Online Trolling Strategies Differ in Political and Interest Forums: Early Results. Multidisciplinary International Symposium on Disinformation in Open Online Media. New York, Springer, 2020, pp. 191–204.

Capistrano J. L. C., Suarez J. J. P., Naval P. C. SALSA: Detection of Cybertrolls using Sentiment, Aggression, Lexical and Syntactic Analysis of Tweets. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, 2019, no. 10, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326467.3326471.

Fornacciari P., Mordonini M., Poggi A., Sani L., Tomaiuolo M. A holistic system for troll detection on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, vol. 89, pp. 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.008.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-29

How to Cite

Vasilkova, V. V. ., Legostaeva , N. I. ., & Kruchinina, P. M. . (2022). Communicative strategies of COVID-trolling on the VKontakte social network. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 14(3), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2021.306

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 3 (2021): Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Sociology

Section

Sociology of Culture and Communications

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.