Citizens E-participation in the modern metropolis: Area and specifics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2022.201Abstract
The paper explores the history of the development of the e-communication environment for interactions between the authorities and citizens in the electoral metropolis of St. Petersburg. The paper presents the results of a comprehensive exploratory study with two components. The first study was conducted in 2021 using the expert survey method, attended by 60 people from among employees of government and local governments, management companies, organizations in the housing and communal services sector, representatives of the scientific and educational community, and city activists. The second study, conducted by surveying 354 employees of 43 executive bodies of state power, reveals assessments and opinions of officials on the nature of the exercise of the right to a position owned by citizens, as well as increasing the level of development of society in the social a group of employees of the executive bodies of state power of St. Petersburg. The results of these empirical studies are interpreted in the context of data, obtained through surveys of the population and employees of St. Petersburg. The results of a survey of civil servants, as well as experience, confirmed the need to support the authorities in order to increase the influence of the population. In the authorities, interaction and information exchange between officials is quite clearly built, and representatives of this group positively assess the effects of using electronic formats of interaction with the population.
Keywords:
electronic interaction, electronic services, expert survey, authorities, social capital,, authorities, social capital, civic engagement, metropolis
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Vidiasova L., Kabanov Y. Online trust and ICTs usage: Findings from St Petersburg, Russia // ICEGOV 2020: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York: ACM, 2020. P. 847–850. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428637
Жуковская О.Ю. Социальный капитал и социальные сети в условиях цифровизации: взаимовлияние и особенности реализации // Цифровая трансформация. 2020. No 4. С. 21–33. https://doi.org/10.38086/2522-9613-2020-4-21-33
Mandarano L., Meenar M., Steins C. Building social capital in the digital age of civic engagement // Journal of planning literature. 2010. Vol. 25 (2). P. 123–135.
Li S., Modi P., Wu M., Chen C.H. S., Nguyen B. Conceptualising and validating the social capital construct in consumer-initiated online brand communities (COBCs) // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019. Vol. 139. P. 303–310.
Islam M.M., Habes E.M., Alam M.M. The usage and social capital of mobile phones and their effect on the performance of microenterprise: An empirical study // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018. Vol. 132. P. 156–164.
Rafaeli S., Ravid G., Soroka V. De-lurking in virtual communities: a social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital // The 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Proceedings. Big Island, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS. 2004.1265478
Pfeil U., Arjan R., Zaphiris P. Panayiotis Age differences in online social networking — A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace // Computers in Human Behavior. 2009. Vol. 25 (3). P. 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.015
Zaphiris P., Sarwar R. Trends, similarities, and differences in the usage of teen and senior public on-line newsgroups //ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 2016. Vol.13. P.403–422. https://doi.org/10.1145/1183456.1183461
Williams D. On and off the net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 593–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x
Chen W. The implications of social capital for the digital divides in America. The Information Society, 2013, vol. 29 (1), pp. 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2012.739265
Lawson-Body A., Willoughby L., Illia A., Lee, S. Innovation characteristics influencing veterans’ adoption of E-government services. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 2014, vol. 54 (3), pp. 34–44.
Голубкина К.В., Абрамян С.К. Электронное правительство и электронная демократия как новые явления информационного общества // Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки. 2018. No 1. С. 80–82.
Демушина О.Н. Электронное участие граждан как форма взаимодействия власти и общества // Карельский научный журнал. 2015. No 1 (10). С. 114–117.
Tolbert C.J., Mossberger K. The effects of E-government on trust and confidence in government // Public Administration Review. 2006. Vol. 66 (3). P. 354–369.
Демушина О.Н. Факторы повышения эффективности электронного участия граждан // Ars Administrandi. 2017. No 2. С. 132–151.
Сидоренко Э.Л., Барциц И.Н., Хисамова З.И. Эффективность цифрового государственного управления: теоретические и прикладные аспекты // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2019. No 2. С. 93–114.
Варшавский Л.Е. Экономико-математические методы анализа динамики рыночных процессов и формирования конкурентной среды в микроэлектронной промышленности // Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность. 2016. No 3 (336). С. 26–44.
Минцифры запустило сбор информации о срочных мерах поддержки ИТ-компаний. URL:https://digital.gov.ru/ru/events/41448/ (дата обращения: 06.03.2022).
Абгаджава Д.А. Факторы политической конфликтности современной России // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Политология. Международные отношения. 2014. Сер. 6, вып. 4. С. 103–108.
Курочкин А.В. Государственная инновационная политика в условиях общества, основанного на знаниях: в поисках нового содержания // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Политология. Международные отношения. 2015. No 2. С. 62–68.
Пясецкая Е.Н. Факторы эффективности электронного участия граждан во взаимодействии власти и общества // Концепт. 2018. No 2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/faktory-effektivnosti-elektronnogo-uchastiya-grazhdan-vo-vzaimodeystvii-vlasti-i-obschestva (дата обращения: 23.01.2022).
Чугунов А.В. Электронное участие как канал обратной связи власти и граждан: проблемы институционализации // Азимут научных исследований: экономика и управление. 2016. No 4 (17). С. 453–459.
Чугунов А.В. Электронное участие в контексте трансформации концепции демократии // Управленческое консультирование. 2017. No 8 (104). С. 14–20.
Стандарт вовлечения граждан в решение вопросов развития городской среды / Министерство строительства и жилищно-коммунального хозяйства. URL: https://100gorodov.ru/attachments/1/34/32ed4e-eeed-4aec-aa35-dc90f830eae3/Cтандарт_гражданского_участия.pdf (дата обращения: 01.03.2022).
Видясов E., Видясова Л. Цифровизация в управлении городом: Исследование коммуникационных каналов приема и обработки обращений в Петербурге // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2021. No 19 (1). С. 115–128. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2021-19-1-115-128
Белый В.А., Смирнова П.В. Приоритеты внедрения электронных государственных сервисов по результатам опроса граждан в Санкт-Петербурге // Государство и граждане в электронной среде: Труды XXIII Международной объединенной научной конференции «Интернет и современное общество», Санкт-Петербург. 2020. No 4. С. 114–120.
Белый В.А., Смирнова П.В., Чугунов А.В. Внедрение электронных государственных сервисов в экономико-демографических условиях пандемии COVID-19: результаты опроса граждан в Санкт-Петербурге // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2020. Т. 8, No 11. С. 97–109. https://doi.org/10.25559/INJOIT.2307-8162.08.202011.97-109
References
Vidiasova L., Kabanov Y. Online trust and ICTs usage: Findings from St Petersburg, Russia // ICEGOV 2020: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York: ACM, 2020. P. 847–850. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428637
Zhukovskaia O.Iu. Social capital and social networks under the conditions of digitalization: Interconnections and implementation features. Tsifrovaia transformatsiia, 2020, no. 4, pp. 21–33. https://doi.org/10.38086/2522-9613-2020-4-21-33 (In Russian)
Mandarano L., Meenar M., Steins C. Building social capital in the digital age of civic engagement // Journal of planning literature. 2010. Vol. 25 (2). P. 123–135.
Li S., Modi P., Wu M., Chen C.H. S., Nguyen B. Conceptualising and validating the social capital construct in consumer-initiated online brand communities (COBCs). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, vol. 139, pp. 303–310.
Islam M.M., Habes E.M., Alam M.M. The usage and social capital of mobile phones and their effect on the performance of microenterprise: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, vol. 132, pp. 156–164.
Rafaeli S., Ravid G., Soroka V. De-lurking in virtual communities: a social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital. The 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Proceedings. Big Island, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265478
Pfeil U., Arjan R., Zaphiris P.Panayiotis Age differences in online social networking — A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, vol. 25 (3), pp. 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.015
Zaphiris P., Sarwar R. Trends, similarities, and differences in the usage of teen and senior public online newsgroups. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2016, vol. 13, pp. 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1145/1183456.1183461
Williams D. On and off the net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 593–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x
Chen W. The implications of social capital for the digital divides in America. The Information Society, 2013, vol. 29 (1), pp. 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2012.739265
Lawson-Body A., Willoughby L., Illia A., Lee, S. Innovation characteristics influencing veterans’ adoption of E-government services. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 2014, vol. 54 (3), pp. 34–44.
Golubkina K.V., Abramian S.K. Electronic government and electronic democracy as the new phenomena of the information society. Gumanitarnye, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki, 2018, no. 1, pp. 80–82. (In Russian)
Demushina O.N. E-participation as a form of relationship between citizens and authority. Karel’skii nauchnyi zhurnal, 2015. no. 10, pp. 114–117. (In Russian)
Tolbert C.J., Mossberger K. The effects of E-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 2006, vol. 66 (3), pp. 354–369.
Demushina O.N. Influence factors for e-participation. Ars Administrandi, 2017, no. 2, pp. 132–151. (In Russian)
Sidorenko E.L., Bartsits I.N., Khisamova Z.I. The efficiency of digital public administration assessing: theoretical and applied aspects. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniia, 2019, no. 2, pp. 93–114. (In Russian)
Varshavskii L.E. Economic and mathematical methods for analyzing trends in market processes and the formation of competitive environment in microelectronics. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’, 2016, no. 3 (336), pp. 26–44. (In Russian)
Mintsifry zapustilo sbor informatsii o srochnykh merakh podderzhki IT-kompanii, Mintsifry, 2022, available at: https://digital.gov.ru/ru/events/41448/ (accessed: 06.03.2022). (In Russian)
Abgadzhava D.A. Political conflicts factors in modern Russia. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2014, ser. 6, iss. 4, pp. 103–108. (In Russian)
Kurochkin A.V. Government investment policy in the conditions of the knowledge economy: new tools and valuable bases. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Political Science. International Relations, 2015, no. 2, pp. 62–68. (In Russian)
Piasetskaia E.N. Efficiency factors of electronic participation of citizens in government and society interaction. Kontsept, 2018, no. 2. (In Russian)
Chugunov A.V. E-participation as g2c feedback channel: institutionalization issues. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: ekonomika i upravlenie, 2016, no. 4 (17), pp. 453–459. (In Russian)
Chugunov A.V. E-Participation in the Context of Democracy Concept Transformation. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie, 2017. no. 8 (104), pp. 14–20. (In Russian)
Standart vovlecheniia grazhdan v reshenie voprosov razvitiia gorodskoi sredy. Ministerstvo stroitel’stva i zhilishchno-kommunal’nogo khoziaistva. 100 gorodov, available at: https://100gorodov.ru/attachments/1/34/32ed4e-eeed-4aec-aa35-dc90f830eae3/Ctandart_grazhdanskogo_uchastiia.pdf (accessed: 01.03.2022). (In Russian)
Vidiasov E., Vidiasova L. The digitalization of citizen participation in city governance: a study of citizen communication channels in St Petersburg. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki, 2021, no. 19 (1), pp. 115–128. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2021-19-1-115-128 (In Russian)
Belyi V.A., Smirnova P.V. Priorities for E-government services implementation: Survey results from St Petersburg. Gosudarstvo i grazhdane v elektronnoi srede. Trudy XXIII Mezhdunarodnoi ob”edinennoi nauchnoi konferentsii “Internet i sovremennoe obshchestvo”, Sankt-Peterburg. Sbornik nauchnykh statei, 2020, no. 4, pp. 114–120. (In Russian)
Belyi V.A., Smirnova P.V., Chugunov A.V. Implementation of electronic state services in the economic and demographic conditions of the COVID-19: Citizens survey results in St Petersburg. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 2020, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 97–109. https://doi.org/10.25559/INJOIT. 2307-8162.08.202011.97-109 (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
2022-08-06
How to Cite
Belyi, V. A., Vidiasova L. А., & Chugunov, A. V. (2022). Citizens E-participation in the modern metropolis: Area and specifics. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 15(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2022.201
Issue
Section
Social processes and social dynamics
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
