Marital relations in the interethnic family

Authors

  • Zinaida V. Sikevich St. Petersburg State University, 7–9 Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Yuliya A. Possel The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, 48, Moika nab., St. Petersburg, 191186, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2018.305

Abstract

The article is devoted to the peculiarities of marital relations in the interethnic family. At the beginning of the article the author analyzes the change in the traditional functions of the family as society is modernized, paying special attention to the change in the position of the woman in the family towards equalizing the rights and duties of both spouses; a reduction in the number of patriarchal families with a traditional distribution of “male” and “female” family roles, as well as the development of a nuclear partnership family. In the author’s opinion, it is especially important to study mixed ethnic groups in terms of the impact of cultural diversity on the socialization of children, satisfaction with marriage and the level of conflict as compared to a monoethnic family. It was such families that were the focus of research, the results of which are analyzed in the article. The motivation for entering into an interethnic marriage is discussed separately, the motive was an emotional attachment, and for families of both types — interethnic and monoethnic. As it turned out, between the groups of interethnic and monoethnic families there are no significant differences in the indicators of satisfaction and conflictness — in both groups the spouses are satisfied with their marriage, families have a rather low level of conflict. Spouses from monoethnic families share an egalitarian model of marital relations to a greater extent than spouses from interethnic families more often committed to the traditional model. However, they both share the same opinion that the strength of the family does not depend on the nationality of the spouses.

Keywords:

marital relations, interethnic family, family functions, nuclear family, motivation, cultural diversity, emotional attachment, egalitarian model of marital relations, the traditional model of marital relations, satisfaction with marriage

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Парсонс Т. Система современных обществ. М.: Аспект-пресс, 1998. 270 с.

Мертон Р. К. Явные и латентные функции // Американская социологическая мысль / под ред. В. И. Добренькова. М.: Прогресс, 1996. 206 с.

Morgan D. Social Theory and the Family. London: Routiedge and Keyan Paul, 1975. 280 р.

Hartmann H. The Family as the locus of gender, class and political struggle. The example of housework// Signs. 1981. 6(3), p. 366–394.

Бовуар С. Второй пол. М.: Прогресс, 1997. 832 с.

Allan G. Family life. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 1985. 196 р.

Goode W. World revolution in family patterns. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1970. 432 p.

Сысенко В. А. Супружеские конфликты. М.: Мысль, 2011. 176 с.

Роджерс К. Брак и его альтернативы. М.: Этерна, 2006. 320 с.

Broderick C. Marriage and the family. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1988. 454 р.

Тащёва А. И., Гриднева С. В., Стефаненко Т. Г., Тихомандрицкая О. А. Этнически смешанные браки сквозь призму феномена удовлетворенности супружеством // Российский психологический журнал. 2016. № 3. С. 39–52.

Мухамеджанова В. Ф. Социально-психологические особенности супружеских взаимоотношений в моно- и полиэтнических семьях, проживающих в сельской местности: автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук. Самара, 2006. 24 с.

Гаджимурадова З. М., Магомедова М. М. Этика семейных отношений двух культур: проблемы толерантности в смешанных браках // Известия ДГПУ. Психолого-педагогические науки. 2012. № 1(18). С. 5–9.

Багарян Р. А. Социально-психологические признаки устойчивости межэтнического брака // Вестник ТГУ. 2009. № 2. С. 276–280.

Айгумова З. И. Психология биэтнических семейных отношений. М.: Прометей, 2016. 144 с.

Левкович В. П. Особенности супружеских взаимоотношений в разнонациональных семьях // Этническая психология. Хрестоматия / под ред. А. И. Егоровой. СПб.: Речь, 2003. С. 293–298.


References

Parsons T. Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv [System of modern society]. Moscow, Aspekt-press, 1998. 270 p. (In Russian)

Merton R. K. Iavnye i latentnye funktsii [Explicit and latent functions]. Amerikanskaia sotsiologicheskaia mysl’ [American sociological thought]. Ed. by V. I. Dobren’kov. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1996. 206 p.(In Russian)

Morgan D. Social Theory and the Family. London, Routledge and Keyan Paul, 1975. 280 р.

Hartmann H. The Family as the locus of gender, class and political struggle.The example of housework. Signs, 1981, 6(3), pp. 366–394.

Bovuar S. Vtoroi pol [The second sex]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1997. 832 p. (In Russian)

Allan G. Family life. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley-Blackwell, 1985. 196 р.

Goode W. World revolution in family patterns. Glencoe, IL, Free Press, 1970. 432 p.

Sysenko V. A. Supruzheskie konflikty [Marital conflicts]. Moscow, Mysl’, 2011. 176 p. (In Russian)

Rodzhers K. Brak i ego al’ternativy [Marriage and its alternatives]. Moscow, Eterna Publ., 2006. 320 p.(In Russian)

Broderick C. Marriage and the family. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1988. 454 р.

Tashcheva A. I., Gridneva S. V., Stefanenko T. G., Tikhomandritskaia O. A. Etnicheski smeshannye braki skvoz’ prizmu fenomena udovletvorennosti supruzhestvom [Ethnically mixed marriages through the phenomenon of marriage satisfaction]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2016, no. 3, pp. 39–52.(In Russian)

Mukhamedzhanova V. F. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie osobennosti supruzheskikh vzaimootnoshenii v mono- i polietnicheskikh sem’iakh, prozhivaiushchikh v sel’skoi mestnosti [Socio-psychological characteristics of conjugal relationships in mono-and polyethnic families living in rural areas], PhD thesis abstract. Samara, 2006. 24 p. (In Russian)

Gadzhimuradova Z. M., Magomedova M. M. Etika semeinykh otnoshenii dvukh kul’tur: problemy tolerantnosti v smeshannykh brakakh [Etics of family relations of two cultures: the problem of tolerance in mixed marriage]. Izvestiia DGPU. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki, 2012, no. 1(18), pp. 5–9. (In Russian)

Bagarian R. A. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie priznaki ustoichivosti mezhetnicheskogo braka [Sociopsychological sighs of the stability of mixed marriage]. Vestnik TGU, 2009, no. 2, pp. 276–280. (In Russian)

Aigumova Z. I. Psikhologiia bietnicheskikh semeinykh otnoshenii [Psychology of biethnic relations]. Moscow, Prometei Publ., 2016. 144 p. (In Russian)

Levkovich V. P. Osobennosti supruzheskikh vzaimootnoshenii v raznonatsional’nykh sem’iakh[Peculiarities of conjugal relationships in polyethnic families]. Etnicheskaia psikhologiia. Khrestomatiia [Ethnic Psychology. A reader]. Ed. by A. I. Egorova. St. Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2003, pp. 293–298. (In Russian)

Published

2018-10-09

How to Cite

Sikevich, Z. V. ., & Possel, Y. A. . (2018). Marital relations in the interethnic family. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 11(3), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2018.305