The experience of applying the procedure of “unfinished sentences” to sociological research

Authors

  • Zinaida V. Sikevich St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.402

Abstract

The article describes author's experience of applying the socio-psychological procedure of “unfinished sentences” in sociological research. This procedure complements the traditional quantitative and nominal scales. Thus, it acts as a monitoring mechanism. In addition, “unfinished sentences” provide an opportunity to touch upon the respondent’s unconscious reflection. The article describes the sets of tested sentences for the study of gender stereotypes, ethno-cultural stereotypes in family life and social distance in interethnic relations. As an example of interpretation and documenting the results of employing the procedure, the article includes a description of the research data on youth ethnic identity of Russian nationality (2019). In the course of the recent study, we found gender heteronomy in ethnic identity and ethnic tolerance. In men, ethnocentrism is included in the content structure of ethnicity more often than in women. This attitude is manifested in the following statements: 1) the concept of “patriotism” includes ethnic, not national content 2) the list of Russian identity characteristics is dominated by natural-spatial and sovereign attribution, while culture occupies a much less important position. Male respondents have a higher level of anti-Islamic phobia. This is manifested mainly in the negative attitude to marriage with a Muslim, as well as to the construction of a mosque in the respondent's hometown. The author substantiates the preference of this procedure in comparison with traditional scales. It provides control in regards to closed questions; its measure is not only reflexive, but also unconscious level of reaction and assessment to the phenomena of the surrounding reality and Thus, series of unfinished sentences really, and relevance for the usage of a series of unfinished sentences while surveying specific population groups (such as teenagers). In the conclusion, detailed recommendations are provided for the use of “unfinished sentences” as the instrumentation of sociological research. The article can be useful for both practicing sociologists and students, studying at the faculty of sociology. 

Keywords:

Introspection, ethnic stereotype, social distance, interethnic relations, ethnic identity, content analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Горшков М. К., Шереги Ф. Э. Прикладная социология: методология и методы. М.: Юрайт, 2018. 372 с.

Лебедева Н. М., Татарко А. Н. Методы этнической и кросскультурной психологии /отв. ред. И. М. Савельева. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2011. 240 с.

Мазилов В. А. Методология психологической науки: история и современность. Ярославль: Ярославский государственный педагогический университет им. К. Д. Ушинского, 2017. 362 с.

Почебут Л. Г. Кросс-культурная и этническая психология. Учеб. пособие для бакалавриата и магистратуры. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Юрайт, 2018. 279 с.

Стефаненко Т. Г. Методы этнопсихологического исследования. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 2003. 320 с.

Климова С. Г. Опыт использования методики неоконченных предложений в социологическом исследовании // Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование (4 М). 1995. № 5–6. С. 43–64.

Косолапов М. С. Исторические корни контент-анализа: два базовых текста по методологии контент-анализа М.: Книжный дом «ЛИБРОКОМ», 2018. 160 с.

Ло Д. После метода: беспорядок и социальная наука. М.: Изд-во ин-та Гайдара, 2015. 352 с.

Пузанкова Ж. В., Тертышникова А. Г. Метод неоконченных предложений в исследовании социальных представлений // Теория и практика общественного развития. 2015. № 4. С. 12–15.

Сикевич З. В. Психологические методы в социологическом исследовании. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2018. 227 с.

Сикевич З. В. Метод психолингвистики в социологическом исследовании // Социологический журнал. 2014. № 20 (4). С. 6–18.

Матяш Н. В., Павлова Т. А. Проблемы современной психодиагностики личности: теория и инструментарий. Брянск: Новый проект, 2019. 114 с.

Сикевич З. В. Метод семантического дифференциала в социологическом исследовании // Вестник СПбГУ. Сер.12. Социология. 2016. № 3. С. 118–128.

Kelly G. A. The psychology of personal constructs: Vol. 1. A theory of personality. London: Routledge, 1991. 208 с.


References

Gorshkov M. K., Sheregi F. E. Applied sociology: methodology and methods, Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2018. 372 p. (In Russian)

Lebedeva N. M., Tatarko A. N. Methods of ethnic and cross-cultural psychology / еd. by I. M. Savel’eva. Moscow, NIU VSHE, 2011. 240 p. (In Russian)

Mazilov V. A. Methodology of psychological science: History and modernity. Yaroslavl, Yaroslav state pedagogical University. K. D. Ushinsky, 2017. 362 p. (In Russian)

Pochebut L. G. Cross-cultural and ethnic psychology. Theory and practice. SPb., St. Petersburg state University publ., 2018. 279 p. (In Russian)

Stefanenko T. G. Methods of ethnopsychological research. Moscow, Moscow state University Publ., 2003. 320 p. (In Russian)

Klimova S. G. The experience of using the methodology of unfinished sentences in a sociological study. Sotsiologiia: metodologiia, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie (4 М), 1995, no. 5–6, pp. 43–64.
(In Russian)

Kosolapov M. S. Historical roots of content analysis: Two basic texts on the methodology of content analysis. Moscow, Knizhnyi dom “LIBROCOM”, 2018. 160 p. (In Russian)

Law J. After method: disorder and social science. Rus. Ed. Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara, 2015. 352 p. (In Russian)

Puzankova Z. V., Tertysnikova А. G. The method unfinished sentences in the study of social representations. Teoriia i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiia, 2015, no. 4, pp. 12–15. (In Russian)

Sikevich Z. V. Psychological methods in a sociological study. SPb., SPbGU Publ., 2018, 227 p. (In Russian)

Sikevich Z. V. Psycholinguistics method in a sociological study. Sociological journal, 2014, no. 20 (4), pp. 6–18. (In Russian)

Matyash N. V., Pavlova T. A. Problems of modern psychodiagnostics of personality: theory and tools. Bryansk, Novyi proekt Publ., 2019. 114 p. (In Russian)

Sikevich Z. V. Method of semantic differencial in a sociological study. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriia 12, Sotsiologia, 2016, no. 3, pp. 118–128. (In Russian)

Kelly G. A. The psychology of personal constructs: Vol. 1. A theory of personality. London, Routledge, 1991. 208 p.

Published

2019-12-04

How to Cite

Sikevich, Z. V. . (2019). The experience of applying the procedure of “unfinished sentences” to sociological research. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 12(4), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.402

Issue

Section

Methods in sociology: traditions and transformations