Work in conditions of remote and hybrid models: The example of IT-companies’ employees

Authors

  • Evgeniya S. Balabanova HSE University, 20, ul. Myasnitskaya, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation
  • Daria A. Molchanova HSE University, 20, ul. Myasnitskaya, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2022.101

Abstract

The paper analyzes work practices and attitudes of employees of Russian IT-sector companies towards working in remote and hybrid formats (combining working from home and from the office). We focus on two main sets of issues. First, we consider workloads and socio-psychological well-being of employees under remote and hybrid employment conditions. Second, we focus on individual and group efficiency of hybrid and remote work formats. The main contribution of this paper to the existing literature is in its focus on organizational and managerial factors which shape employee attitudes to remote working. Drawing on a survey study of 400 employees in Russian IT-sector in March 2021, we find that hybrid format significantly increases the workload of employees compared to remote working. Nevertheless, paradoxically, the hybrid format is preferred by the majority of respondents. We conclude that the attitudes to remote work are shaped mainly by the character of work tasks and the employee’s position in the network of organizational communications. We find evidence that respondents without subordinates, who are responsible for their individual work tasks, tend to react positively to remote work, emphasizing the “convenience” of working from home, whereas managers and employees who are actively involved in communication processes and organization of other people’s work, are much more critical to remote working. Our findings also suggest that the quality of organizational communications plays a key role in determining both employees’ social well-being and performance assessment. In remote working, information overloads become a serious problem for workers, while the lack of information, by contrast, is not considered to be a serious problem.

Keywords:

remote work, hybrid work format, IT-companies, intra-organizational communications, workload, work efficiency, work-life conflict, burnout

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Цифровая грамотность и удаленная работа в условиях пандемии: совместный аналитический доклад ВЦИОМ и Social Business Group. 15.05.2020. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/czifrovaya-gramotnost-i-udalennaya-rabota-v-usloviyakh-pandemii (дата обращения: 02.04.2021).

Мануйлова А. Без дела на год // Коммерсантъ. 2021. № 80, 14.05. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4804884 (дата обращения: 15.05.2021).

Воронин Г. Л. Социальное самочувствие россиян (1994–1996–1998 гг.). «Мерцающая» стратификация // Социологические исследования. 2001. № 6. С. 53–66.

Крупец Я. Н. Социальное самочувствие как интегральный показатель адаптированности // Социологические исследования. 2003. № 4. С. 143–144.

Алмакаева А. М., Гашенина Н. В. Субъективное благополучие: концептуализация, измерение и российская специфика // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 1. С. 4–13.

Бессокирная Г. П. Социальное самочувствие рабочих // Социологические исследования. 2008. № 3. С. 34–37.

Социология пандемии. Проект коронаФОМ / Рук. авт. колл. А. А. Ослон. М.: Институт фонда «Общественное мнение», 2021.

Харченко В. С. Образ жизни российских фрилансеров: социологический анализ // Социологические исследования. 2014. № 4. С. 54–63.

Климова С. Г., Климов И. А. Опыт перехода российских компаний на удаленную работу в ситуации пандемии // Социологические исследования. 2021. № 7. С. 50–60.

Более трети работающих удаленно россиян заявили о желании вернуться в офис // Известия. 2021. 25.03. URL: https://iz.ru/1142085/2021-03-25/bolee-treti-rabotaiushchikh-udalenno-rossiian-zaiavili-o-zhelanii-vernutsia-v-ofis (дата обращения: 26.03.2021).

Петракова А. В., Канонир Т. Н., Куликова А. А., Орел Е. А. Особенности психологического стресса у учителей в условиях дистанционного преподавания во время пандемии COVID-19 // Вопросы образования. 2021. № 1. С. 93–114.

Cho E. Examining boundaries to understand the impact of COVID-19 on vocational behaviors // Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2020. Vol. 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103437

Полякова В. Половина россиян заявили о выгорании на работе // РБК. 2021. 24.03. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/society/24/03/2021/605a4d1c9a79470dd28cfa92 (дата обращения: 23.04.2021).

Филипенок А. Больше половины москвичей заявили о нежелании возвращаться с удаленки // РБК. 2021. 02.02. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/society/02/02/2021/601824779a7947e94fb218b0 (дата обращения: 23.04.2021).

Удаленка и карантин: результаты опроса соискателей // HeadHunter. 2020. Октябрь. URL: https://hhcdn.ru/file/16953070.pdf (дата обращения: 23.04.2021).

Cooke F. L., Dickmann M., Parry E. IJHRM after 30 years: taking stock in times of COVID-19 and looking towards the future of HR research // The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2021. Vol. 32, no. 1. P. 1–23.

Ерицян К. Ю., Русакова М. М., Александрова А. А., Усачева Н. М. Пережить локдаун: изменения в занятости и психологическое благополучие населения в эпоху пандемии // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2021. № 3. С. 250–270.

Камнева К. Предприятия могут оставить на удаленке до половины штата // Российская газета. 2020. 23.05. URL: https://rg.ru/2020/05/23/predpriiatiia-mogut-ostavit-na-udalenke-do-poloviny-shtata.html (дата обращения: 29.05.2021).

Логинов Д. М. Социальное самочувствие российского населения в период острой фазы эпидемиологического кризиса // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 6. С. 470–487.

Holst H., Fessler A., Niehoff S. COVID-19, social class and work experience in Germany: inequalities in work-related health and economic risks // European Societies. 2020. Vol. 23. P. S495–S512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1828979

Nieuwenhuis R., Yerkes M. A. Workers’ well-being in the context of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic // Community, Work & Family. 2021. Vol. 24, no. 2. P. 226–235.

Fodor É., Gregor A., Koltai J., Kováts E. The impact of COVID-19 on the gender division of child care work in Hungary // European Societies. 2020. Vol. 23. P. S95–S110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1817522

Petts R. J., Carlson D. L., Pepin J. R. A gendered pandemic: Childcare, homeschooling, and parents’ employment during COVID‐19 // Gender, Work and Organization. 2021. Vol. 28, no. S2. P. 515–534.

Shockley K. M., Clark M. A., Dodd H., King E. B. Work-family strategies during COVID-19: Examining gender dynamics among dual-earner couples with young children // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2021. Vol. 106, no. 1. P. 15–28.

Chong S., Huang Y., Chang C.-H. (D.). Supporting interdependent telework employees: A moderated-mediation model linking daily COVID-19 task setbacks to next-day work withdrawal // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2020. Vol. 105, no. 12. P. 1408–1422.

Useem J. When working from home doesn’t work. IBM pioneered telecommuting. Now it wants people back in the office // The Atlantic. 2017. November. URL: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/11/when-working-from-home-doesnt-work/540660/?utm_source=feed (дата обращения: 29.05.2021).

Мануйлова А. Руководителей заразили стрессоустойчивостью // Коммерсантъ. 2021. 29.06. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4878487?utm_source=newspaper&utm_medium=email&utm_ campaign=newsletter (дата обращения: 30.06.2021).

Как изменилась работа руководителей российских компаний на удаленке. URL: https://ict.moscow/research/kak-izmenilas-rabota-rukovoditelei-rossiiskikh-kompanii-na-udalenke (дата обращения: 24.04.2021).

Foss N. J. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on firms’ organizational designs // Journal of Management Studies. 2021. Vol. 58, no. 1. P. 268–272.

Черноусов И. Некоторые компании оказались не готовы к удаленной работе // Российская газета. 2020. 30.04. URL: https://rg.ru/2020/04/30/nekotorye-kompanii-okazalis-ne-gotovy-k-udalennoj-rabote.html (дата обращения: 24.04.2021).

Spicer A. Organizational culture and COVID-19 // Journal of Management Studies. 2020. Vol. 57, no. 8. P. 1737–1740.

Gander M. Let the right one in: A Bourdieusian analysis of gender inequality in universities’ senior management // Gender, Work and Organization. 2019. Vol. 26, no. 2. P. 107–123.

Кудрявцева Е. И., Волкова Н. В. Роль сетевой коммуникативной активности в формировании проектной команды // Российский журнал менеджмента. 2019. Т. 17, № 1. С. 47–70.

Howard-Grenville J. How to sustain your organization’s culture when everyone is remote // MIT Sloan Management Review. 2020. Vol. 62, no. 1. P. 19–21.

Kessler S. IBM, remote-work pioneer, is calling thousands of employees back to the office // QUARTZ. 2017. March 21. URL: https://qz.com/924167/ibm-remote-work-pioneer-is-calling-thousands-of-employees-back-to-the-office (дата обращения: 21.02.2021).

Гордеев В. Почти половина работников в России заявили о падении мотивации // Новости РБК. 2021. 02.02. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/society/02/02/2021/60145d409a794772770ed336 (дата обращения: 21.02.2021).

Новая нормальность: образ жизни, рынки, инфраструктура и коммуникации после пандемии // Аналитический спецпроект НАФИ. 2020. Апрель. URL: https://nafi.ru/upload/New%20normal_ NAFI%20project.pdf (дата обращения: 21.02.2021).

Чампа Д. Нужно ли оставлять сотрудников работать из дома после пандемии // Ведомости. 2021. 11 марта. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/management/articles/2021/03/11/860968-nuzhno-ostavlyat (дата обращения: 12.03.2021).

Сохранить дистанцию: работодателям понравился удаленный формат // Известия. 2020. 17.04. URL: https://iz.ru/1000750/ekaterina-iasakova/sokhranit-distantciiu-rabotodateliam-ponravilsia-udalennyi-format (дата обращения: 12.03.2021).

Эфендиев А. Г., Балабанова Е. С., Ребров А. В. Управление человеческими ресурсами и эффективность компаний: есть ли связь? // Российский журнал менеджмента. 2014. Т. 12, № 1. С. 39–68.

Kramer A., Kramer K. Z. The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility // Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2020. Vol. 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442

Подцероб М. Почему гибридная работа усугубляет неравенство сотрудников // Ведомости. 2021. 6 августа. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/career/articles/2021/08/05/881055-gibridnaya-rabota?utm_campaign=newspaper_6_8_2021&utm_medium=email&utm_source=vedomosti (дата обращения: 06.08.2021).

Burrell J., Fourcade M. The Society of Algorithms // Annual Review of Sociology. 2021. Vol. 47. P. 213–237.

King R. С., Bu N. Perceptions of the mutual obligations between employees and employers: a comparative study of new generation IT professionals in China and the United States // International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2005. Vol. 16, no. 1. P. 46–64.

Земнухова Л. В. IT-работники на рынке труда // Социология науки и технологий. 2013. Т. 4, № 2. С. 77–90.

Козина И. М., Сережкина Е. В. Производственные факторы стресса в работе российских и французских IT-специалистов // Социологические исследования. 2019. № 5. С. 26–35.

Stieger S., Lewetz D., Swami V. Emotional well-being under conditions of lockdown: An experience sampling study in Austria during the COVID-19 pandemic // Journal of Happiness Studies. 2021. Vol. 22, no. 6. P. 2703–2720.

Кучерова А. А., Субботина Т. Н. Особенности управления персоналом в условиях пандемии COVID-19 // Экономика и бизнес: теория и практика. 2020. Т. 2, № 12. С. 75–79.

Burt R. S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.

Mäkelä K., Barner-Rasmussen W., Ehrnrooth M., Koveshnikov A. Potential and recognized boundary spanners in multinational corporations // Journal of World Business. 2019. Vol. 54, no. 4. P. 335–349.

References

Digital literacy and remote work in the pandemic. A joint analytical report by VCIOM and Social Business Group. 15.05.2020, available at: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/czifrovaya-gramotnost-i-udalennaya-rabota-v-usloviyakh-pandemii (accessed: 02.04.2021). (In Russian)

Manuilova A. Without business for a year. Kommersant, 2021, no. 80, 14.05, available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4804884 (accessed: 15.05.2021). (In Russian)

Voronin G. L. Social well-being of Russians (1994–1996–1998). “Fluctuating” Stratification. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2001, no. 6, pp. 53–66. (In Russian)

Krupets Ya. N. Social well-being as an integral indicator of adaptation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2003, no. 4, pp. 143–144. (In Russian)

Almakaeva A. M., Gashenina N. V. Subjective well-being: Conceptualization, assessment and Russian specifics. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny, 2020, no. 1, pp. 4–13. (In Russian)

Bessokirnaya G. P. Social well-being in the Workplace. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2008, no. 3, pp. 34–37. (In Russian)

The Sociology of the Pandemic. CoronaFOM Project, ed. by A. A. Oslon. Moscow: Public Opinion Foundation Institute, 2021. (In Russian)

Khartchenko V. S. Way of life of Russian freelancers — a sociological analysis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2014, no. 4, pp. 54–63. (In Russian)

Klimova S. G., Klimov I. A. The experience of Russian companies in switching to remote work in the context of the pandemic. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2021, no. 7, pp. 50–60. (In Russian)

More than a third of Russians working remotely say they would like to return to the office. Izvestia, 2021, 25.03, available at: https://iz.ru/1142085/2021-03-25/bolee-treti-rabotaiushchikh-udalenno-rossiian-zaiavili-o-zhelanii-vernutsia-v-ofis (accessed: 26.03.2021). (In Russian)

Petrakova A. V., Kanonire T. N., Kulikova A. A., Orel E. A. Characteristics of teacher stress during distance learning imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Voprosy obrazovaniia, 2021, no. 1, pp. 93–114. (In Russian)

Cho E. Examining boundaries to understand the impact of COVID-19 on vocational behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2020, vol. 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103437

Polyakova V. Half of Russians reported burnout at work. RBC, 2021, 24.03, available at: https://www.rbc.ru/society/24/03/2021/605a4d1c9a79470dd28cfa92 (accessed: 23.04.2021). (In Russian)

Filippenok A. More than half of Muscovites said they did not want to return from remote work. RBC, 2021, 02.02, available at: https://www.rbc.ru/society/02/02/2021/601824779a7947e94fb218b0 (accessed: 23.04.2021). (In Russian)

Remote work and quarantine: the results of a survey of job seekers. HeadHunter, 2020, October, available at: https://hhcdn.ru/file/16953070.pdf (accessed: 23.04.2021). (In Russian)

Cooke F. L., Dickmann M., Parry E. IJHRM after 30 years: taking stock in times of COVID-19 and looking towards the future of HR research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2021, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–23.

Eritsyan K. Y., Rusakova M. M., Aleksanrova A. A., Usacheva N. M. Surviving a lockdown: Changes in employment and psychological well-being of the population in the pandemic era. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny, 2021, no. 3, pp. 250–270. (In Russian)

Kamneva K. Enterprises can leave up to half of the staff on a remote basis. Rossiiskaia gazeta, 2020, 23.05, available at: https://rg.ru/2020/05/23/predpriiatiia-mogut-ostavit-na-udalenke-do-poloviny-shtata.html (accessed: 29.05.2021). (In Russian)

Loginov D. M. Social well-being of the Russian population during the acute stage of the epidemiological crisis. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny, 2020, no. 6, pp. 470–487. (In Russian)

Holst H., Fessler A., Niehoff S. COVID-19, social class and work experience in Germany: inequalities in work-related health and economic risks. European Societies, 2020, vol. 23, pp. S495–S512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1828979

Nieuwenhuis R., Yerkes M. A. Workers’ well-being in the context of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Community, Work & Family, 2021, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 226–235.

Fodor É, Gregor A., Koltai J., Kováts E. The impact of COVID-19 on the gender division of childcare work in Hungary. European Societies, 2020, vol. 23, pp. S95–S110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1817522

Petts R. J., Carlson D. L., Pepin J. R. A gendered pandemic: Childcare, homeschooling, and parents’ employment during COVID‐19. Gender, Work and Organization, 2021, vol. 28, no. S2, pp. 515–534.

Shockley K. M., Clark M. A., Dodd H., King E. B. Work-family strategies during COVID-19: Examining gender dynamics among dual-earner couples with young children. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2021, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 15–28.

Chong S., Huang Y., Chang C.-H. (D.) Supporting interdependent telework employees: A moderated-mediation model linking daily COVID-19 task setbacks to next-day work withdrawal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2020, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 1408–1422.

Useem J. When working from home doesn’t work. IBM pioneered telecommuting. Now it wants people back in the office. The Atlantic, 2017, November, available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/11/when-working-from-home-doesnt-work/540660/?utm_source=feed (accessed: 29.05.2021).

Manujlova A. Managers were infected with stress resistance. Kommersant, 2021, 29.06, available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4878487?utm_source=newspaper&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter (accessed: 30.06.2021). (In Russian)

How the work of Russian managers has changed remotely, available at: https://ict.moscow/research/kak-izmenilas-rabota-rukovoditelei-rossiiskikh-kompanii-na-udalenke (accessed: 24.04.2021). (In Russian)

Foss N. J. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on firms’ organizational designs. Journal of Management Studies, 2021, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 268–272.

Chernousov I. Some companies were not ready to work remotely. Rossiiskaia gazeta, 2020, 30.04, available at: https://rg.ru/2020/04/30/nekotorye-kompanii-okazalis-ne-gotovy-k-udalennoj-rabote.html (accessed: 24.04.2021). (In Russian)

Spicer A. Organizational culture and COVID-19. Journal of Management Studies, 2020, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1737–1740.

Gander M. Let the right one in: A Bourdieusian analysis of gender inequality in universities’ senior management. Gender, Work and Organization, 2019, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 107–123.

Kudriavtseva E. I., Volkova N. V. The role of network communication activities to establish the project team. Russian Management Journal, 2019, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 47–70. (In Russian)

Howard-Grenville J. How to sustain your organization’s culture when everyone is remote. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2020, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 19–21.

Kessler S. IBM, remote-work pioneer, is calling thousands of employees back to the office. QUARTZ, 2017, March 21, available at: https://qz.com/924167/ibm-remote-work-pioneer-is-calling-thousands-of-employees-back-to-the-office (accessed: 21.02.2021).

Gordeev V. Almost half of employees in Russia reported a decline in motivation. RBC News, 2021, 02.02, available at: https://www.rbc.ru/society/02/02/2021/60145d409a794772770ed336 (accessed: 21.02.2021). (In Russian)

The new normality: Lifestyles, markets, infrastructure and communications after the Pandemic. NAFI Analytical Special Project, 2020, April, available at: https://nafi.ru/upload/New%20normal_NAFI%20project.pdf (accessed: 21.02.2021). (In Russian)

Champa D. Should employees be left to work from home after a pandemic. Vedomosti, 2021, March 11, available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/management/articles/2021/03/11/860968-nuzhno-ostavlyat (accessed: 12.03.2021). (In Russian)

Save the distance: Employers liked the remote format. Izvestia, 2020, 17.04, available at: https://iz.ru/1000750/ekaterina-iasakova/sokhranit-distantciiu-rabotodateliam-ponravilsia-udalennyi-format (accessed: 12.03.2021). (In Russian)

Efendiev A. G., Balabanova E. S., Rebrov A. V. Human resource management and companies’ efficiency: Is there a connection? Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta, 2014, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 39–68. (In Russian)

Kramer A., Kramer K. Z. The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2020, vol. 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442

Podzerob M. Why hybrid work exacerbates employee inequality. Vedomosti, 2021, August 6, available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/career/articles/2021/08/05/881055-gibridnaya-rabota?utm_campaign=newspaper_6_8_2021&utm_medium=email&utm_source=vedomosti (accessed: 06.08.2021). (In Russian)

Burrell J., Fourcade M. The society of algorithms. Annual Review of Sociology, 2021, vol. 47, pp. 213–237.

King R. С., Bu N. Perceptions of the mutual obligations between employees and employers: A comparative study of new generation IT professionals in China and the United States. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2005, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 46–64.

Zemnukhova L. V IT-workers at the labour market. Sotsiologiia nauki i tekhnologii, 2013, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 77–90. (In Russian)

Kozina I. М., Serezhkina Е. V. Stressful characteristics of work of Russian and French software developers. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2019, no. 5, pp. 26–35. (In Russian)

Stieger S., Lewetz D., Swami V. Emotional well-being under conditions of lockdown: An experience sampling study in Austria during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2021, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2703–2720.

Kucherova A. A., Subbotina T. N. Features of personnel management during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriia i praktika, 2020, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 75–79. (In Russian)

Burt R. S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.

Mäkelä K., Barner-Rasmussen W., Ehrnrooth M., Koveshnikov A. Potential and recognized boundary spanners in multinational corporations. Journal of World Business, 2019, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 335–349.

Published

2022-06-16

How to Cite

Balabanova, E. S., & Molchanova, D. A. (2022). Work in conditions of remote and hybrid models: The example of IT-companies’ employees. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 15(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2022.101

Issue

Section

SOCIOLOGY OF ECONOMICS, LABOR AND PROFESSIONS