НАДРОЛЕВОЕ ПОВЕДЕНИЕ РАБОТНИКА: ПРОЯВЛЕНИЯ, ПРЕДПОСЫЛКИ И ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯ

Евгения Сергеевна Балабанова; Дарья Андреевна Баранова; Вероника Эдуардовна Деминская

doi:10.21638/10.21638/11701/spbu12.2017.204

Authors

Евгения Сергеевна Балабанова National Research University Higher School of Economics, 33/5 Kirpichnaya ul., Moscow, 105187, Russian Federation
Дарья Андреевна Баранова National Research University Higher School of Economics, 33/5 Kirpichnaya ul., Moscow, 105187, Russian Federation
Вероника Эдуардовна Деминская National Research University Higher School of Economics, 33/5 Kirpichnaya ul., Moscow, 105187, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/10.21638/11701/spbu12.2017.204

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine manifestations, antecedents, and consequences of employees’ extra-role behaviour in Russian business organisations. The authors empirically identify four distinct types of extra-role behaviour: active prosocial, passive prosocial, oriented towards extra efforts at work, and challenge-oriented. The study is based on a sample of 112 employees from two organiza-tions (manufacturing and IT). The analysis shows that organization-based management practices are stronger predictors of extra-role behaviors compared to respondents’ individual characteristics. The authors also found that the two types of extra-role behavior (‘passive prosocial’ and ‘oriented towards extra-efforts at work’), typically demonstrated by among by low-resource employees, seemingly result from poor management practices, and negatively influence on respondents’ job satisfaction and career promotions. In turn, high-resource employees tend to be engaged in active prosocial and change-ori-ented behaviors. These two types of extra-role behavior lead to higher work satisfaction and career success. The analysis enriches understanding of the nature of extra-role behavior in Russian organisa-tions, its costs and benefits for organisations. It reveals the most effective types of extra-role behavior to be recommended for managerial implications.

Keywords:

employee extra-role behavior, organizational citizenship behavior, prosocial behavior, employee voice, work practices

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Беленький В. X. Активность народных масс. Красноярск: Кн. изд-во, 1973. 215 с.

Тукумцев Б. Г. Самарский мониторинг социально-трудовой сферы // Социологические исследования. 2001. № 7. С. 41–50.

Лапин Н. И., Коржева Э. М., Наумова Н. Ф. Теория и практика социального планирования. М.: Политиздат, 1975. 200 с.

Бочаров В., Тукумцев Б. Новые требования к работнику промышленного производства в условиях современной модернизации (социологический анализ) // Телескоп. 2015. № 3 (111). С. 44–49.

Климов А. А. Идентификация с организацией и рабочей группой как фактор экстраролевого поведения работника: дис … д-ра психол. наук. М., 2015. 159 с.

Социология труда. Теоретико-прикладной толковый словарь / отв. ред. В. А. Ядов. СПб.: Наука, 2006. 426 с.

Organ D. W. Organizational citizenship behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1988. 160 p.

Williams L. J., Anderson S. E. Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors // Journal of Management. 1991. Vol. 17, N 3. P. 601–617.

MacKenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M., Podsakoff N. P. Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: Do challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line? // Personnel Psychology. 2011. Vol. 64, N 3. P. 559–592.

Балабанова Е. С., Эфендиев А. Г. «Голос» работника в российских бизнес-организациях: концептуализация и результаты эмпирического анализа // Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2015. Т. 24, № 3. С. 61–87.

Гулевич О. А. Гражданское поведение в организации: условия и последствия // Организационная психология. 2013. Т. 3, № 3. С. 78–96.

Bowling N. A., Burns G. N., Beehr T. A. Productive and counterproductive attendance behavior: an examination of early and late arrival to and departure from work // Human Performance. 2010. Vol. 23, N 4. P. 305–322.

Tse H. M., Chiu W. C. Transformational leadership and job performance: A social identity perspective // Journal of business research. 2014. Vol. 67, N 1. P. 2827–2835.

Jensen J. M., Raver J. L. When self-management and surveillance collide: consequences for employees› organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior // Group & Organization Management. 2012. Vol. 37, N 3. P. 308–346.

Chan S. H. J., Lai H. Y. I. Understanding the link between communication satisfaction, perceived justice and organizational citizenship behavior // Journal of business research. 2017. Vol. 70, N 1. P. 214–223.

Bolino M. C., Klotz A. C., Turnley W. H., Harvey J. Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2013. Vol. 34, N 4. P. 542–559.

Bergeron D. M., Shipp A. J., Rosen B. Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Career Outcomes: The Cost of Being a Good Citizen // Journal of Management. 2013. Vol. 39, N 4. P. 958–984.

Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Moorman R. H., Fetter R. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors // Leadership Quarterly. 1990. Vol. 1. P. 107–142.

Jepsen D. M., Rodwell J. J. Justice in the workplace: the centrality of social versus judgmental predictors of performance varies by gender // The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2009. Vol. 20, N 10. P. 2066–2083.

Goldberg R. L. The Development of Markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure // Psychological Assessment. 1992. Vol. 4, N 1. P. 26–42.

Bass B. M., Avolio B. J. Full range leadership development — Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden, 1997. 170 p.

Адизес И. К. Управление жизненным циклом корпорации. СПб.: Питер, 2007. 384 c.

Эфендиев А. Г., Балабанова Е. С. Социальная организация российского бизнеса: теоретико-методологические подходы и их реализация в эмпирическом исследовании // Социологические исследования. 2012. № 5. С. 58–69.

References

Belen’kii V. X. Aktivnost’ narodnykh mass [Activity of masses]. Krasnoiarsk, 1973. 215 p. (In Russian)

Tukumtsev B. G. Samarskii monitoring sotsial’no-trudovoi sfery [Samara monitoring of the sociolabour sphere]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2001, no. 7, pp. 41–50. (In Russian)

Lapin N. I., Korzheva E. M., Naumova N. F. Teoriia i praktika sotsial’nogo planirovaniia [Theory and practice of the social planning]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1975. 200 p. (In Russian)

Bocharov V., Tukumtsev B. Novye trebovaniia k rabotniku promyshlennogo proizvodstva v usloviiakh sovremennoi modernizatsii (sotsiologicheskii analiz) [New demands to the industrial workers in the context of modernization (sociological analysis)]. Teleskop, 2015, no. 3 (111), pp. 44–49. (In Russian)

Klimov A. A. Identifikatsiia s organizatsiei i rabochei gruppoi kak faktor ekstrarolevogo povedeniia rabotnika. Diss. … dokt. psikhol. nauk [Organizational and workgroup identification as a factor of extra-role employee behavior. Thesis of PhD]. Moscow, 2015. 159 p. (In Russian)

Sotsiologiia truda. Teoretiko-prikladnoi tolkovyi slovar’ [Sociology of labour: Theoretical and practical dictionary]. Ed. by V. A. Jadov. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2006. 426 p. (In Russian).

Organ D. W. Organizational citizenship behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, Lexington Books, 1988. 160 p.

Williams L. J., Anderson S. E. Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors. Journal of Management, 1991, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 601–617.

MacKenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M., Podsakoff N. P. Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: Do challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line? Personnel Psychology, 2011, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 559–592.

Balabanova E. S., Efendiev A. G. «Golos» rabotnika v rossiiskikh biznes-organizatsiiakh: kontseptualizatsiia i rezul’taty empiricheskogo analiza [The Voice of Employees in Russian Business Organizations: Conceptualization and Empirical Analysis]. Mir Rossii: Sotsiologiia, etnologiia, 2015, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 61–87. (In Russian).

Gulevich O. A. Grazhdanskoe povedenie v organizatsii: usloviia i posledstviia [Organizational citizenship behavior: conditions and consequences]. Organizatsionnaia psikhologiia, 2013, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 78–96. (In Russian)

Bowling N. A., Burns G. N., Beehr T. A. Productive and counterproductive attendance behavior: an examination of early and late arrival to and departure from work. Human Performance, 2010, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 305–322.

Tse H. M., Chiu W. C. Transformational leadership and job performance: A social identity perspective. Journal of business research, 2014, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 2827–2835.

Jensen J. M., Raver J. L. When self-management and surveillance collide: consequences for employees› organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior. Group & Organization Management, 2012, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 308–346.

Chan S. H. J., Lai H. Y. I. Understanding the link between communication satisfaction, perceived justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of business research, 2017, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 214–223.

Bolino M. C., Klotz A. C., Turnley W. H., Harvey J. Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 542–559.

Bergeron D. M., Shipp A. J., Rosen B. Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Career Outcomes: The Cost of Being a Good Citizen. Journal of Management, 2013, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 958–984.

Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Moorman R. H., Fetter R. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1990, vol. 1, pp. 107–142.

Jepsen D. M., Rodwell J. J. Justice in the workplace: the centrality of social versus judgmental predictors of performance varies by gender. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2009, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2066–2083.

Goldberg R. L. The Development of Markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure. Psychological Assessment, 1992, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 26–42.

Bass B. M., Avolio B. J. Full range leadership development — Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA, Mind Garden Publ., 1997. 170 p.

Adizes I. K. Upravlenie zhiznennym tsiklom korporatsii [Managing corporate lifecycles]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2007. 384 p. (In Russian)

Efendiev A. G., Balabanova E. S. Sotsial’naia organizatsiia rossiiskogo biznesa: teoretikometodologicheskie podkhody i ikh realizatsiia v empiricheskom issledovanii [The social organization of Russian business: Theoretical and methodological approaches and their realization in the empirical study]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2012, no. 5, pp. 58–69. (In Russian)